Functional brain interactions that serve cognitive-affective processing during pain and placebo analgesia - PubMed (original) (raw)

Functional brain interactions that serve cognitive-affective processing during pain and placebo analgesia

Jason G Craggs et al. Neuroimage. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Pain requires the integration of sensory, cognitive, and affective information. The use of placebo is a common methodological ploy in many fields, including pain. Neuroimaging studies of pain and placebo analgesia (PA) have yet to identify a mechanism of action. Because PA must result from higher order processes, it is likely influenced by cognitive and affective dimensions of the pain experience. A network of brain regions involved in these processes includes the anterior and posterior insula (A-Ins, P-Ins), dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (DACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the supplementary motor area (SMA). We used connectivity analyses to investigate the underlying mechanisms associated with Placebo analgesia in a group of chronic pain patients. Structural equation models (SEM) of fMRI data evaluated the inter-regional connectivity of these regions across three conditions: (1) initial Baseline (B1), (2) placebo (PA), and (3) Placebo Match (PM). SEM results of B1 data in the left hemisphere confirmed hypothesized regional relationships. However, inter-regional relationships were dynamic and the network models varied across hemispheres and conditions. Deviations from the B1 model in the PA and PM conditions correspond to our manipulation of expectation for pain. The dynamic changes in inter-regional influence across conditions are interpreted in the context of a self-reinforcing feedback loop involved in the induction and maintenance of PA. Although it is likely that placebo analgesia results partly from afferent inhibition of a nociceptive signal, the mechanisms likely involve the interaction of a cognitive-affective network with input from both hemispheres.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Left hemisphere: Anatomical model of a cognitive – affective pain-related network. Based on a priori hypotheses, brain regions in the left hemisphere (Table 1) were identified a regions of interest (ROIs). The interregional relationships among ROIs are shown here for the left hemisphere across three conditions: Baseline (B1 - top), Placebo (PA – middle), and Placebo Match (PM – bottom). Arrows indicate estimated direction of influence. Green arrows indicate positive path coefficients and red arrows indicate negative coefficients.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Right hemisphere: Anatomical model of a cognitive – affective pain-related network. Based on a priori hypotheses, brain regions in the right hemisphere (Table 1) were identified a regions of interest (ROIs). The interregional relationships among ROIs are shown here for the left hemisphere across three conditions: Baseline (B1 - top), Placebo (PA – middle), and Placebo Match (PM – bottom). Arrows indicate estimated direction of influence. Green arrows indicate positive path coefficients and red arrows indicate negative coefficients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amanzio M, Benedetti F. Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific subsystems. J Neurosci. 1999;19(1):484–494. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ardila A. The role of insula in language: an unsettled question. Aphasiology. 1999;13(1):79–87.
    1. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.
    1. Borum ML. Irritable bowel syndrome. Prim Care. 2001;28(3):523–538. vi. - PubMed
    1. Brooks JC, Zambreanu L, Godinez A, Craig AD, Tracey I. Somatotopic organisation of the human insula to painful heat studied with high resolution functional imaging. Neuroimage. 2005;27(1):201–209. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources