We gather together: insulators and genome organization - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
We gather together: insulators and genome organization
Julie A Wallace et al. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007 Oct.
Abstract
When placed between an enhancer and promoter, certain DNA sequence elements inhibit enhancer-stimulated gene expression. The best characterized of these enhancer-blocking insulators, gypsy in Drosophila and the CTCF-binding element in vertebrates and flies, stabilize contacts between distant genomic regulatory sites leading to the formation of loop domains. Current results show that CTCF mediates long-range contacts in the mouse beta-globin locus and at the Igf2/H19-imprinted locus. Recently described active chromatin hubs and transcription factories also involve long-range interactions; it is likely that CTCF interferes with their formation when acting as an insulator. The properties of CTCF, and its newly described genomic distribution, suggest that it may play an important role in large-scale nuclear architecture, perhaps mediated by the co-factors with which it interacts in vivo.
Figures
Figure 1. Loop domains and enhancer blocking insulators
A. Action of CTCF at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus. On the maternally transmitted allele, CTCF binds to sites in the imprinted control region (ICR) and prevents downstream enhancers from activating Igf2 expression. The ICR of the paternal allele is methylated, CTCF does not bind, and the enhancer is no longer blocked [–6]. B. Loop formation stabilized by proteins and RNA bound to gypsy sites in Drosophila [20] (Figure taken from [20]; see [22] for review of a more complete version of this complex). For clarity, one set of interactions, leading to the formation of a single loop, is shown. Clusters of such sites form insulator bodies in vivo. (a) The proteins recruited to the site include the DNA-binding protein Su(Hw), CP190, and Mod(mdg4)2.2, as well as Topors, a ubiquitin ligase, which associates with the nuclear lamina and the insulator complex and is required for insulator function. (b,c) Loop formation and insulator activity also involve RNA and are dependent on members of the RNAi processing pathway. (d) Loop formation is interfered with by the RNA-binding protein, Rm62. The protein CP190 is additionally involved in insulator function at sites that do not contain Su(Hw). C. Contacts between distant CTCF-binding sites (red circles), which are also nuclease hypersensitive sites (HS), in embryonic day 12.5 mouse erythroid progenitor cells [9,15]. HS-62 is ~ 62kb upstream, and HS5 ~ 30kb upstream, of the globin gene Ey. 3′HS1 is downstream of the globin gene array. Other hypersensitive sites (yellow) mark locus control regions; not all such sites are shown. The globin genes (blue squares) are not expressed in these cells. Mutating the CTCF site at 3′HS1 destroys the interactions between it and the other two CTCF sites. At a later stage of erythroid development additional contacts are made between locus control region and other regulatory sites to form the ACH; this structure is independent of CTCF binding [15]. D. Loop domain models for the action of the ICR at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus, showing contacts involving the ICR, detected by 3C and other methods, that differ on the maternal and paternal alleles [15,18]. It is proposed that the conformation of the paternal allele allows contacts between Igf2 promoters and the enhancer that are blocked on the maternal allele. (a,b) The ICR on the maternal allele (a) makes contact with an imprinted site (DMR1) located upstream of the Igf2 promoters. On the paternal allele (b) the ICR contacts another such site, DMR2, downstream of Igf2. This should make the Igf2 promoters accessible to the enhancers located downstream of H19. For a more elaborate model based on additional data, see [16]. (c,d) A second set of 3C experiments [18] shows that on the maternal allele (c) one of the downstream enhancers (mesodermal or endodermal specific, depending on cell type) contacts the ICR, effectively inhibiting contact between enhancer and Igf2 promoter. Other interactions, not shown, occur between the ICR and the Igf2 promoter. On the paternal allele (d), with CTCF not bound to the ICR, the enhancer makes contact with the appropriate subset of Igf2 promoters. Differences between the results shown in (a,b) and (c,d) may reflect different choices of anchor and target sites for the 3C analysis, and may not be mutually exclusive. Some of these interactions may be tissue-specific; which interactions are most important for establishing allele-specific expression is not yet clear.
Figure 1. Loop domains and enhancer blocking insulators
A. Action of CTCF at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus. On the maternally transmitted allele, CTCF binds to sites in the imprinted control region (ICR) and prevents downstream enhancers from activating Igf2 expression. The ICR of the paternal allele is methylated, CTCF does not bind, and the enhancer is no longer blocked [–6]. B. Loop formation stabilized by proteins and RNA bound to gypsy sites in Drosophila [20] (Figure taken from [20]; see [22] for review of a more complete version of this complex). For clarity, one set of interactions, leading to the formation of a single loop, is shown. Clusters of such sites form insulator bodies in vivo. (a) The proteins recruited to the site include the DNA-binding protein Su(Hw), CP190, and Mod(mdg4)2.2, as well as Topors, a ubiquitin ligase, which associates with the nuclear lamina and the insulator complex and is required for insulator function. (b,c) Loop formation and insulator activity also involve RNA and are dependent on members of the RNAi processing pathway. (d) Loop formation is interfered with by the RNA-binding protein, Rm62. The protein CP190 is additionally involved in insulator function at sites that do not contain Su(Hw). C. Contacts between distant CTCF-binding sites (red circles), which are also nuclease hypersensitive sites (HS), in embryonic day 12.5 mouse erythroid progenitor cells [9,15]. HS-62 is ~ 62kb upstream, and HS5 ~ 30kb upstream, of the globin gene Ey. 3′HS1 is downstream of the globin gene array. Other hypersensitive sites (yellow) mark locus control regions; not all such sites are shown. The globin genes (blue squares) are not expressed in these cells. Mutating the CTCF site at 3′HS1 destroys the interactions between it and the other two CTCF sites. At a later stage of erythroid development additional contacts are made between locus control region and other regulatory sites to form the ACH; this structure is independent of CTCF binding [15]. D. Loop domain models for the action of the ICR at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus, showing contacts involving the ICR, detected by 3C and other methods, that differ on the maternal and paternal alleles [15,18]. It is proposed that the conformation of the paternal allele allows contacts between Igf2 promoters and the enhancer that are blocked on the maternal allele. (a,b) The ICR on the maternal allele (a) makes contact with an imprinted site (DMR1) located upstream of the Igf2 promoters. On the paternal allele (b) the ICR contacts another such site, DMR2, downstream of Igf2. This should make the Igf2 promoters accessible to the enhancers located downstream of H19. For a more elaborate model based on additional data, see [16]. (c,d) A second set of 3C experiments [18] shows that on the maternal allele (c) one of the downstream enhancers (mesodermal or endodermal specific, depending on cell type) contacts the ICR, effectively inhibiting contact between enhancer and Igf2 promoter. Other interactions, not shown, occur between the ICR and the Igf2 promoter. On the paternal allele (d), with CTCF not bound to the ICR, the enhancer makes contact with the appropriate subset of Igf2 promoters. Differences between the results shown in (a,b) and (c,d) may reflect different choices of anchor and target sites for the 3C analysis, and may not be mutually exclusive. Some of these interactions may be tissue-specific; which interactions are most important for establishing allele-specific expression is not yet clear.
Figure 1. Loop domains and enhancer blocking insulators
A. Action of CTCF at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus. On the maternally transmitted allele, CTCF binds to sites in the imprinted control region (ICR) and prevents downstream enhancers from activating Igf2 expression. The ICR of the paternal allele is methylated, CTCF does not bind, and the enhancer is no longer blocked [–6]. B. Loop formation stabilized by proteins and RNA bound to gypsy sites in Drosophila [20] (Figure taken from [20]; see [22] for review of a more complete version of this complex). For clarity, one set of interactions, leading to the formation of a single loop, is shown. Clusters of such sites form insulator bodies in vivo. (a) The proteins recruited to the site include the DNA-binding protein Su(Hw), CP190, and Mod(mdg4)2.2, as well as Topors, a ubiquitin ligase, which associates with the nuclear lamina and the insulator complex and is required for insulator function. (b,c) Loop formation and insulator activity also involve RNA and are dependent on members of the RNAi processing pathway. (d) Loop formation is interfered with by the RNA-binding protein, Rm62. The protein CP190 is additionally involved in insulator function at sites that do not contain Su(Hw). C. Contacts between distant CTCF-binding sites (red circles), which are also nuclease hypersensitive sites (HS), in embryonic day 12.5 mouse erythroid progenitor cells [9,15]. HS-62 is ~ 62kb upstream, and HS5 ~ 30kb upstream, of the globin gene Ey. 3′HS1 is downstream of the globin gene array. Other hypersensitive sites (yellow) mark locus control regions; not all such sites are shown. The globin genes (blue squares) are not expressed in these cells. Mutating the CTCF site at 3′HS1 destroys the interactions between it and the other two CTCF sites. At a later stage of erythroid development additional contacts are made between locus control region and other regulatory sites to form the ACH; this structure is independent of CTCF binding [15]. D. Loop domain models for the action of the ICR at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus, showing contacts involving the ICR, detected by 3C and other methods, that differ on the maternal and paternal alleles [15,18]. It is proposed that the conformation of the paternal allele allows contacts between Igf2 promoters and the enhancer that are blocked on the maternal allele. (a,b) The ICR on the maternal allele (a) makes contact with an imprinted site (DMR1) located upstream of the Igf2 promoters. On the paternal allele (b) the ICR contacts another such site, DMR2, downstream of Igf2. This should make the Igf2 promoters accessible to the enhancers located downstream of H19. For a more elaborate model based on additional data, see [16]. (c,d) A second set of 3C experiments [18] shows that on the maternal allele (c) one of the downstream enhancers (mesodermal or endodermal specific, depending on cell type) contacts the ICR, effectively inhibiting contact between enhancer and Igf2 promoter. Other interactions, not shown, occur between the ICR and the Igf2 promoter. On the paternal allele (d), with CTCF not bound to the ICR, the enhancer makes contact with the appropriate subset of Igf2 promoters. Differences between the results shown in (a,b) and (c,d) may reflect different choices of anchor and target sites for the 3C analysis, and may not be mutually exclusive. Some of these interactions may be tissue-specific; which interactions are most important for establishing allele-specific expression is not yet clear.
Figure 1. Loop domains and enhancer blocking insulators
A. Action of CTCF at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus. On the maternally transmitted allele, CTCF binds to sites in the imprinted control region (ICR) and prevents downstream enhancers from activating Igf2 expression. The ICR of the paternal allele is methylated, CTCF does not bind, and the enhancer is no longer blocked [–6]. B. Loop formation stabilized by proteins and RNA bound to gypsy sites in Drosophila [20] (Figure taken from [20]; see [22] for review of a more complete version of this complex). For clarity, one set of interactions, leading to the formation of a single loop, is shown. Clusters of such sites form insulator bodies in vivo. (a) The proteins recruited to the site include the DNA-binding protein Su(Hw), CP190, and Mod(mdg4)2.2, as well as Topors, a ubiquitin ligase, which associates with the nuclear lamina and the insulator complex and is required for insulator function. (b,c) Loop formation and insulator activity also involve RNA and are dependent on members of the RNAi processing pathway. (d) Loop formation is interfered with by the RNA-binding protein, Rm62. The protein CP190 is additionally involved in insulator function at sites that do not contain Su(Hw). C. Contacts between distant CTCF-binding sites (red circles), which are also nuclease hypersensitive sites (HS), in embryonic day 12.5 mouse erythroid progenitor cells [9,15]. HS-62 is ~ 62kb upstream, and HS5 ~ 30kb upstream, of the globin gene Ey. 3′HS1 is downstream of the globin gene array. Other hypersensitive sites (yellow) mark locus control regions; not all such sites are shown. The globin genes (blue squares) are not expressed in these cells. Mutating the CTCF site at 3′HS1 destroys the interactions between it and the other two CTCF sites. At a later stage of erythroid development additional contacts are made between locus control region and other regulatory sites to form the ACH; this structure is independent of CTCF binding [15]. D. Loop domain models for the action of the ICR at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus, showing contacts involving the ICR, detected by 3C and other methods, that differ on the maternal and paternal alleles [15,18]. It is proposed that the conformation of the paternal allele allows contacts between Igf2 promoters and the enhancer that are blocked on the maternal allele. (a,b) The ICR on the maternal allele (a) makes contact with an imprinted site (DMR1) located upstream of the Igf2 promoters. On the paternal allele (b) the ICR contacts another such site, DMR2, downstream of Igf2. This should make the Igf2 promoters accessible to the enhancers located downstream of H19. For a more elaborate model based on additional data, see [16]. (c,d) A second set of 3C experiments [18] shows that on the maternal allele (c) one of the downstream enhancers (mesodermal or endodermal specific, depending on cell type) contacts the ICR, effectively inhibiting contact between enhancer and Igf2 promoter. Other interactions, not shown, occur between the ICR and the Igf2 promoter. On the paternal allele (d), with CTCF not bound to the ICR, the enhancer makes contact with the appropriate subset of Igf2 promoters. Differences between the results shown in (a,b) and (c,d) may reflect different choices of anchor and target sites for the 3C analysis, and may not be mutually exclusive. Some of these interactions may be tissue-specific; which interactions are most important for establishing allele-specific expression is not yet clear.
Similar articles
- CTCF-dependent chromatin insulator is linked to epigenetic remodeling.
Ishihara K, Oshimura M, Nakao M. Ishihara K, et al. Mol Cell. 2006 Sep 1;23(5):733-42. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.008. Mol Cell. 2006. PMID: 16949368 - Chromatin domains, insulators, and the regulation of gene expression.
Ghirlando R, Giles K, Gowher H, Xiao T, Xu Z, Yao H, Felsenfeld G. Ghirlando R, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Jul;1819(7):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.01.016. Epub 2012 Feb 2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012. PMID: 22326678 Free PMC article. Review. - Cohesin mediates chromatin interactions that regulate mammalian β-globin expression.
Chien R, Zeng W, Kawauchi S, Bender MA, Santos R, Gregson HC, Schmiesing JA, Newkirk DA, Kong X, Ball AR Jr, Calof AL, Lander AD, Groudine MT, Yokomori K. Chien R, et al. J Biol Chem. 2011 May 20;286(20):17870-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.207365. Epub 2011 Mar 29. J Biol Chem. 2011. PMID: 21454523 Free PMC article. - Setting up and maintaining differential insulators and boundaries for genomic imprinting.
Murrell A. Murrell A. Biochem Cell Biol. 2011 Oct;89(5):469-78. doi: 10.1139/o11-043. Epub 2011 Sep 21. Biochem Cell Biol. 2011. PMID: 21936680 Review.
Cited by
- Association of DDX5/p68 protein with the upstream erythroid enhancer element (EHS1) of the gene encoding the KLF1 transcription factor.
Chen X, Pillay S, Lohmann F, Bieker JJ. Chen X, et al. J Biol Chem. 2023 Dec;299(12):105489. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105489. Epub 2023 Nov 22. J Biol Chem. 2023. PMID: 38000658 Free PMC article. - Characterization of a new CCCTC-binding factor binding site as a dual regulator of Epstein-Barr virus latent infection.
Lee SH, Kim KD, Cho M, Huh S, An SH, Seo D, Kang K, Lee M, Tanizawa H, Jung I, Cho H, Kang H. Lee SH, et al. PLoS Pathog. 2023 Jan 25;19(1):e1011078. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011078. eCollection 2023 Jan. PLoS Pathog. 2023. PMID: 36696451 Free PMC article. - Maternal effect factors that contribute to oocytes developmental competence: an update.
Innocenti F, Fiorentino G, Cimadomo D, Soscia D, Garagna S, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Zuccotti M; SIERR. Innocenti F, et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Apr;39(4):861-871. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02434-y. Epub 2022 Feb 15. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022. PMID: 35165782 Free PMC article. Review. - Rice RS2-9, which is bound by transcription factor OSH1, blocks enhancer-promoter interactions in plants.
Liu H, Jiang L, Wen Z, Yang Y, Singer SD, Bennett D, Xu W, Su Z, Yu Z, Cohn J, Chae H, Que Q, Liu Y, Liu C, Liu Z. Liu H, et al. Plant J. 2022 Feb;109(3):541-554. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15574. Epub 2021 Dec 22. Plant J. 2022. PMID: 34773305 Free PMC article. - Investigating the Barrier Activity of Novel, Human Enhancer-Blocking Chromatin Insulators for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy.
Papayanni PG, Psatha N, Christofi P, Li XG, Melo P, Volpin M, Montini E, Liu M, Kaltsounis G, Yiangou M, Emery DW, Anagnostopoulos A, Papayannopoulou T, Huang S, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Yannaki E. Papayanni PG, et al. Hum Gene Ther. 2021 Oct;32(19-20):1186-1199. doi: 10.1089/hum.2021.142. Hum Gene Ther. 2021. PMID: 34477013 Free PMC article.
References
- Capelson M, Corces VG. The ubiquitin ligase dTopors directs the nuclear organization of a chromatin insulator. Mol Cell. 2005;20:105–116. - PubMed
- Chung JH, Whiteley M, Felsenfeld G. A 5′ element of the chicken beta-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila. Cell. 1993;74:505–514. - PubMed
- Bell AC, Felsenfeld G. Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature. 2000;405:482–485. - PubMed
- Hark AT, Schoenherr CJ, Katz DJ, Ingram RS, Levorse JM, Tilghman SM. CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus. Nature. 2000;405:486–489. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous