Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
. 2007 Nov 21;298(19):2296-304.
doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296.
Affiliations
- PMID: 18029834
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296
Review
Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review
Dena M Bravata et al. JAMA. 2007.
Abstract
Context: Without detailed evidence of their effectiveness, pedometers have recently become popular as a tool for motivating physical activity.
Objective: To evaluate the association of pedometer use with physical activity and health outcomes among outpatient adults.
Data sources: English-language articles from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Sport Discus, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Thompson Scientific (formerly known as Thompson ISI), and ERIC (1966-2007); bibliographies of retrieved articles; and conference proceedings.
Study selection: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported an assessment of pedometer use among adult outpatients, reported a change in steps per day, and included more than 5 participants.
Data extraction and data synthesis: Two investigators independently abstracted data about the intervention; participants; number of steps per day; and presence or absence of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia. Data were pooled using random-effects calculations, and meta-regression was performed.
Results: Our searches identified 2246 citations; 26 studies with a total of 2767 participants met inclusion criteria (8 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 18 observational studies). The participants' mean (SD) age was 49 (9) years and 85% were women. The mean intervention duration was 18 weeks. In the RCTs, pedometer users significantly increased their physical activity by 2491 steps per day more than control participants (95% confidence interval [CI], 1098-3885 steps per day, P < .001). Among the observational studies, pedometer users significantly increased their physical activity by 2183 steps per day over baseline (95% CI, 1571-2796 steps per day, P < .0001). Overall, pedometer users increased their physical activity by 26.9% over baseline. An important predictor of increased physical activity was having a step goal such as 10,000 steps per day (P = .001). When data from all studies were combined, pedometer users significantly decreased their body mass index by 0.38 (95% CI, 0.05-0.72; P = .03). This decrease was associated with older age (P = .001) and having a step goal (P = .04). Intervention participants significantly decreased their systolic blood pressure by 3.8 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.7-5.9 mm Hg, P < .001). This decrease was associated with greater baseline systolic blood pressure (P = .009) and change in steps per day (P = .08).
Conclusions: The results suggest that the use of a pedometer is associated with significant increases in physical activity and significant decreases in body mass index and blood pressure. Whether these changes are durable over the long term is undetermined.
Comment in
- Have pedometer, will travel.
Rowland K, Schumann SA. Rowland K, et al. J Fam Pract. 2008 Feb;57(2):90-3. J Fam Pract. 2008. PMID: 18248728 Free PMC article. No abstract available. - Review: use of pedometers increases physical activity in adults.
Elley CR. Elley CR. Evid Based Med. 2008 Jun;13(3):72. doi: 10.1136/ebm.13.3.72. Evid Based Med. 2008. PMID: 18515619 No abstract available. - Review: use of pedometers increases physical activity in adults.
Stamler LL. Stamler LL. Evid Based Nurs. 2008 Jul;11(3):75. doi: 10.1136/ebn.11.3.75. Evid Based Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18583487 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Behavioral Counseling to Promote a Healthful Diet and Physical Activity for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Adults Without Known Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].
Patnode CD, Evans CV, Senger CA, Redmond N, Lin JS. Patnode CD, et al. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. PMID: 29364620 Free Books & Documents. Review. - A pedometer-based walking intervention in 45- to 75-year-olds, with and without practice nurse support: the PACE-UP three-arm cluster RCT.
Harris T, Kerry S, Victor C, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Fox-Rushby J, Whincup P, Ekelund U, Furness C, Limb E, Anokye N, Ibison J, DeWilde S, David L, Howard E, Dale R, Smith J, Normansell R, Beighton C, Morgan K, Wahlich C, Sanghera S, Cook D. Harris T, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jun;22(37):1-274. doi: 10.3310/hta22370. Health Technol Assess. 2018. PMID: 29961442 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.
Freak-Poli RL, Cumpston M, Peeters A, Clemes SA. Freak-Poli RL, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD009209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009209.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23633368 Updated. Review. - Screening for Hypertension in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].
Gartlehner G, Vander Schaaf EB, Orr C, Kennedy SM, Clark R, Viswanathan M. Gartlehner G, et al. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Nov. Report No.: 20-05261-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Nov. Report No.: 20-05261-EF-1. PMID: 33284560 Free Books & Documents. Review. - The effects of step-count monitoring interventions on physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based randomised controlled trials in adults.
Chaudhry UAR, Wahlich C, Fortescue R, Cook DG, Knightly R, Harris T. Chaudhry UAR, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Oct 9;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01020-8. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020. PMID: 33036635 Free PMC article.
Cited by
- Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.
Harris T, Kerry S, Victor C, Ekelund U, Woodcock A, Iliffe S, Whincup P, Beighton C, Ussher M, David L, Brewin D, Adams F, Rogers A, Cook D. Harris T, et al. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 4;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-5. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23289648 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Health-Promoting Lifestyle: A Considerable Contributing Factor to Quality of Life in Patients With Hypertension.
Samiei Siboni F, Alimoradi Z, Atashi V. Samiei Siboni F, et al. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018 Oct 19;15(2):191-199. doi: 10.1177/1559827618803853. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018. PMID: 33786035 Free PMC article. - A review of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for adult males.
George ES, Kolt GS, Duncan MJ, Caperchione CM, Mummery WK, Vandelanotte C, Taylor P, Noakes M. George ES, et al. Sports Med. 2012 Apr 1;42(4):281-300. doi: 10.2165/11597220-000000000-00000. Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22350570 Review. - Association of Habitual Physical Activity With Cardiovascular Disease Risk.
Lin H, Sardana M, Zhang Y, Liu C, Trinquart L, Benjamin EJ, Manders ES, Fusco K, Kornej J, Hammond MM, Spartano NL, Pathiravasan CH, Kheterpal V, Nowak C, Borrelli B, Murabito JM, McManus DD. Lin H, et al. Circ Res. 2020 Oct 23;127(10):1253-1260. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317578. Epub 2020 Aug 26. Circ Res. 2020. PMID: 32842915 Free PMC article. - Increasing Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Intensity Walking and Step Activity Intervention.
Thompson ED, Pohlig RT, McCartney KM, Hornby TG, Kasner SE, Raser-Schramm J, Miller AE, Henderson CE, Wright H, Wright T, Reisman DS. Thompson ED, et al. Stroke. 2024 Jan;55(1):5-13. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044596. Epub 2023 Dec 22. Stroke. 2024. PMID: 38134254 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous