Protein folding studied by single-molecule FRET - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Protein folding studied by single-molecule FRET

Benjamin Schuler et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

A complete understanding of a protein-folding mechanism requires description of the distribution of microscopic pathways that connect the folded and unfolded states. This distribution can, in principle, be described by computer simulations and theoretical models of protein folding, but is hidden in conventional experiments on large ensembles of molecules because only average properties are measured. A long-term goal of single-molecule fluorescence studies is to time-resolve the structural events as individual molecules make transitions between folded and unfolded states. Although such studies are still in their infancy, the work till now shows great promise and has already produced novel and important information on current issues in protein folding that has been impossible or difficult to obtain from ensemble measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Two-state folding dynamics of an individual protein molecule illustrated as a diffusive process on a two-dimensional free energy surface (left) with a corresponding equilibrium folding/unfolding trajectory (white). An intramolecular distance (corresponding to the distance between a donor and an acceptor fluorophore in a single molecule FRET experiment) is plotted as a function of time (right), showing rapid jumps between folded and unfolded state. An ultimate goal of single molecule experiments is to time-resolve these transitions (expanded scale, top right).

Figure 2

Figure 2

Overview of instrumentation and data reduction in confocal single molecule spectroscopy. The scheme on the right illustrates the main components of a 4-channel confocal single molecule instrument, such as the one commercially available [85], that collects fluorescence photons separated by polarization and wavelength and records their individual arrival times. (a) Sample of a trajectory of detected photons recorded from molecules freely diffusing in solution (in this example Csp_Tm_ in 1.5 M GdmCl [37,38]), where every burst corresponds to an individual molecule traversing the diffraction-limited confocal volume (see upper right of the scheme). (b) 2-dimensional histogram of donor fluorescence lifetime τD versus transfer efficiency E calculated from individual bursts, resulting in subpopulations that can be assigned to the folded and unfolded protein and molecules without active acceptor at E ≈ 0 (shaded in grey). (c) Projection of the histogram onto the E axis. (d) Subpopulation-specific time-correlated single photon counting histograms from donor and acceptor photons from all bursts assigned to unfolded molecules that can be used to extract distance distributions [31,36,38]. (e) Subpopulation-specific donor intensity correlation function, in this case reporting on the nanosecond reconfiguration dynamics of the unfolded protein [58].

Figure 3

Figure 3

Protein folding kinetics measured with single molecule spectroscopy in a microfluidic mixing device [43]. Starting from Csp_Tm_ unfolded at high denaturant concentration (top), transfer efficiency histograms are measured at different positions along the channel, corresponding to different times after mixing. The fits to Gaussians having the same peak position and width at all times illustrate the redistribution of populations expected for a two-state system after the initial chain collapse.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Transfer efficiency distribution p(E | t) for a Gaussian chain with different ratios of observation time t and chain reconfiguration time τr, with t/τr = 0 (dark blue), 0.1 (light blue), 1 (green), 5 (yellow), and 10 (red) (assuming _R_0 = 〈_r_2〉), illustrating the sensitivity of transfer efficiency distributions to chain dynamics. Gopich and Szabo [33] showed that for a Gaussian chain and t >> τr, τr ≈ 10 t _σ_2, with σ2=σobs2−σnoise2, where σobs2 is the observed variance in E, and σnoise2 is the variance due to noise and other effects not dependent on the interdye distance.

Box

Box. Förster resonance energy transfer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fisher TE, Oberhauser AF, Carrion-Vazquez M, Marszalek PE, Fernandez JM. The study of protein mechanics with the atomic force microscope. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 1999;24:379–384. - PubMed
    1. Zhuang X, Rief M. Single-molecule folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003;13:88–97. - PubMed
    1. Bustamante C, Chemla YR, Forde NR, Izhaky D. Mechanical processes in biochemistry. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:705–748. - PubMed
    1. Forman JR, Clarke J. Mechanical unfolding of proteins: insights into biology, structure and folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007;17:58–66. - PubMed
    1. Hummer G, Szabo A. Free energy surfaces from single-molecule force spectroscopy. Accounts Chem Res. 2005;38:504–513. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources