Complex genetic interactions underlying expression differences between Drosophila races: analysis of chromosome substitutions - PubMed (original) (raw)
Complex genetic interactions underlying expression differences between Drosophila races: analysis of chromosome substitutions
Hurng-Yi Wang et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008.
Abstract
Regulation of gene expression is usually separated into cis and trans components. The separation may become artificial if much of the variation in expression is under multigenic and epistatic (e.g., cis-by-trans) control. There is hence a need to quantify the relative contribution of cis, trans, and cis-by-trans effects on expression divergence at different levels of evolution. To do so across the whole genome, we analyzed the full set of chromosome-substitution lines between the two behavioral races of Drosophila melanogaster. Our observations: (i) Only approximately 3% of the genes with an expression difference are purely cis regulated. In fact, relatively few genes are governed by simple genetics because nearly 80% of expression differences are controlled by at least two chromosomes. (ii) For 14% of the genes, cis regulation does play a role but usually in conjunction with trans regulation. This joint action of cis and trans effects, either additive or epistatic, is referred to as inclusive cis effect. (iii) The percentage of genes with inclusive cis effect increases to 32% among genes that are strongly differentiated between the two races. (iv) We observed a nonrandom distribution of trans-acting factors, with a substantial deficit on the second chromosome. Between Drosophila racial groups, trans regulation of expression difference is extensive, and cis regulation often evolves in conjunction with trans effects.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
- Dominance and the evolutionary accumulation of cis- and trans-effects on gene expression.
Lemos B, Araripe LO, Fontanillas P, Hartl DL. Lemos B, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14471-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805160105. Epub 2008 Sep 12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008. PMID: 18791071 Free PMC article. - Cis and trans regulatory effects contribute to natural variation in transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster.
Genissel A, McIntyre LM, Wayne ML, Nuzhdin SV. Genissel A, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jan;25(1):101-10. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm247. Epub 2007 Nov 12. Mol Biol Evol. 2008. PMID: 17998255 - Genomic inferences of the cis-regulatory nucleotide polymorphisms underlying gene expression differences between Drosophila melanogaster mating races.
Osada N, Kohn MH, Wu CI. Osada N, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Aug;23(8):1585-91. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl023. Epub 2006 Jun 5. Mol Biol Evol. 2006. PMID: 16754642 - A genetic and molecular profile of third chromosome centric heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster.
Fitzpatrick KA, Sinclair DA, Schulze SR, Syrzycka M, Honda BM. Fitzpatrick KA, et al. Genome. 2005 Aug;48(4):571-84. doi: 10.1139/g05-025. Genome. 2005. PMID: 16094423 Review. - Mitotic and polytene chromosomes: comparisons between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
Aulard S, Monti L, Chaminade N, Lemeunier F. Aulard S, et al. Genetica. 2004 Mar;120(1-3):137-50. doi: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017637.10230.c4. Genetica. 2004. PMID: 15088654 Review.
Cited by
- The effects of the sex chromosomes on the inheritance of species-specific traits of the copulatory organ shape in Drosophila virilis and Drosophila lummei.
Kulikov AM, Sorokina SY, Melnikov AI, Gornostaev NG, Seleznev DG, Lazebny OE. Kulikov AM, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244339. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33373382 Free PMC article. - The impact of cis-acting polymorphisms on the human phenotype.
Jones BL, Swallow DM. Jones BL, et al. Hugo J. 2011 Dec;5(1-4):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s11568-011-9155-4. Epub 2011 Jul 20. Hugo J. 2011. PMID: 23205161 Free PMC article. - Tempo and mode of regulatory evolution in Drosophila.
Coolon JD, McManus CJ, Stevenson KR, Graveley BR, Wittkopp PJ. Coolon JD, et al. Genome Res. 2014 May;24(5):797-808. doi: 10.1101/gr.163014.113. Epub 2014 Feb 24. Genome Res. 2014. PMID: 24567308 Free PMC article. - _Cis_- and _Trans_-regulatory Effects on Gene Expression in a Natural Population of Drosophila melanogaster.
Osada N, Miyagi R, Takahashi A. Osada N, et al. Genetics. 2017 Aug;206(4):2139-2148. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.201459. Epub 2017 Jun 14. Genetics. 2017. PMID: 28615283 Free PMC article. - Two types of cis-trans compensation in the evolution of transcriptional regulation.
Takahasi KR, Matsuo T, Takano-Shimizu-Kouno T. Takahasi KR, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 13;108(37):15276-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105814108. Epub 2011 Aug 29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21876147 Free PMC article.
References
- Wittkopp PJ, Haerum BK, Clark AG. Evolutionary changes in cis and trans gene regulation. Nature. 2004;430:85–88. - PubMed
- Cowles CR, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Lander ES. Detection of regulatory variation in mouse genes. Nat Genet. 2002;32:432–437. - PubMed
- Yan H, Yuan W, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Allelic variation in human gene expression. Science. 2002;297:1143. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases