Myeloid-derived suppressor cells promote cross-tolerance in B-cell lymphoma by expanding regulatory T cells - PubMed (original) (raw)
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells promote cross-tolerance in B-cell lymphoma by expanding regulatory T cells
Paolo Serafini et al. Cancer Res. 2008.
Abstract
Tumor-induced T-cell tolerance is a major mechanism that facilitates tumor progression and limits the efficacy of immune therapeutic interventions. Regulatory T cells (Treg) play a central role in the induction of tolerance to tumor antigens, yet the precise mechanisms regulating its induction in vivo remain to be elucidated. Using the A20 B-cell lymphoma model, here we identify myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) as the tolerogenic antigen presenting cells capable of antigen uptake and presentation to tumor-specific Tregs. MDSC-mediated Treg induction requires arginase but is transforming growth factor-beta independent. In vitro and in vivo inhibition of MDSC function, respectively, with NOHA or sildenafil abrogates Treg proliferation and tumor-induced tolerance in antigen-specific T cells. These findings establish a role for MDSCs in antigen-specific tolerance induction through preferential antigen uptake mediating the recruitment and expansion of Tregs. Furthermore, therapeutic interventions, such as in vivo phosphodiesterase 5-inhibition, which effectively abrogate the immunosuppressive role of MDSCs and reduce Treg numbers, may play a critical role in delaying and/or reversing tolerance induction.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures
Figure 1. Phenotypic analysis of APCs in lymphoma
Splenocytes from CD45.1+/+ BALB/c mice challenged 28 days before with 106 CD45.2+ A20-HA/GFP cells or with CD45.2+ A20-HA as control, were stained with anti-CD45.2-PerCP, anti-CD11b-PE and anti-CD11c-APC antibodies and analyzed by FACS. A) Gating strategies: a first gate (Live) was drawn on the Forward vs side scatter plot to exclude aggregate and cellular debris, while a second gate (APCs: Antigen Presenting Cells) was designed on the GFP+ CD45.2- population. B) CD11b and CD11c population were determined by gating in Live (B, left dot plot) or in Llive and APC (B right dot plot). C) Alternatively splenocytes were labeled with anti-CD45.2-PerCP, anti-CD11b-APC antibodies and with PE conjugated antibodies against the indicated marker. The histograms are gated on the hierarchical gate CD11b+ and APCs and Live. Data represent 3 pooled spleens representative of other 2 experiments. 105 events were acquired for analysis.
Figure 2. Molecular properties of CD11b+ cells isolated from lymphoma-bearing mice
Mice were injected intravenously with 106 A20-HA cells or with PBS on day 0. On day 28 splenic CD11b+ cells were magnetically purified. A) An aliquot of CD11b+ cells (105 cells) was admixed with HA-specific, thy1.1+, CFSE labeled, magnetically purified CD4+ or CD8+ cells (105) in the presence of Thy1.2 Balb/c splenocytes as feeder (106) with or without relevant peptide. After 5 days, cell proliferation was determined as CFSE dilution by FACS analysis by gating on the clonotypic population. Data are normalized on the controls (proliferation of T cells cultured with CD11b+ cells isolated from naïve mice). B) Aliquots of CD11b+ were frozen and later tested for arginase or plated to determine TGF-β secretion or NO production as described in the materials and methods. C) The proliferation was repeated as described in (A) in the presence of NOHA (an arginase inhibitor), L-NMMA (a NOS2 inhibitor), anti-TGF-β neutralizing antibody, or with different combinations of these molecules. Data derived from one experiment representative of two.
Figure 3. FOXP3+ CD4 T cells are increased after co-cultured with MDSCs
A) CD11b+ cells were isolated from naïve or A20-HA tumor-bearing mice. 105 cells were then co-cultured with 105 HA-specific, magnetically purified, CFSE labeled, Thy1.1+CD4+ T cells and with 106 Thy1.1-/- BALB/c splenocytes in the presence or absence of the relevant peptide. After 5 days the cultures were labeled with anti-CD4 and anti-thy1.1, permeabilized and then labeled with anti-FOXP3. The dot plots are gated on the clonotypic T cell population. B) Results from 3 replicate wells are represented as the histogram mean +/-SD of FOXP3+CFSElow cells gated on the CD4+/Thy1.1+ population. C) Either high purity CD11bhigh,CD11clow MDSC or high purity CD11blow,CD11chigh MHC class IIhigh dendritic cells were sorted using a FacsAria cell sorter from spleens of mice challenged with A20WT or A20HA 28 days prior. MDSCs (105) or DCs (105) were cultured with CFSE-labeled, HA-specific, Thy1.1+/+ CD4+ T cells (105) and Thy1.2+/+ Balb/c splenocytes (106) as feeder cells. The cultures were analyzed after 3 days by flow cytometry as described in (A). The proliferation of clonotypic FOXP3+ T cells (left panel) or clonotypic FOXP3neg T cells (right panel) was analyzed using Cell Diva and FCS software. C) The same experiment described in (A) was conducted in the presence of the inhibitors described in Fig2. Data derived from triplicate wells of 1 experiment representative of a total of 3 experiments.
Figure 4. Expanded Treg are derived from a preexisting regulatory pool and not from the conversion of FOXP3neg CD4+ T cells
A) HA-specific CD4+/CD25+ T cells (104) isolated from Thy1.1+/+ 6.5 mice and CD4+CD25- T cells purified from Thy1.1+/-/Thy/1.2+/- 6.5 mice (105) were cultured with Thy1.2+/+ Balb/c splenocytes (106) and with splenic CD11b+ cells (105) magnetically purified from the spleens of mice injected with PBS, A20HA or A20WT 28 days prior. No exogenous peptide was added to the culture. Five days later cells were labeled with anti thy1.1, anti thy1.2 and FOXP3 antibodies and analyzed by FACS. Average +/- SD of triplicate wells was analyzed by gating either on the thy1+thy1.2- population (black bar) or on the Thy1.1+/Thy1.2+ population (gray bar) from the mixture culture (upper panel) or on CD25-depleted, HA-specific, CD4+ T cells cultured with the same CD11b+ cells (lower panel-effector alone). B) The experiment was repeated with CFSE labeling of T cells. Proliferation was determined by CFSE dilution on either the CD4+ Thy1.1+/Thy1.2- “Treg” population (black bars) or on the Thy1.1+/Thy1.2+ “effector” population (gray bars). C) HA-specific CD4+CD25+T cells isolated from Thy1.1+/+ Thy1.2-/-6.5 mice were admixed (1:10 ratio) with CD4+CD25- T cells sorted from Thy1.1+/-/Thy/1.2+/- 6.5 mice (left panel). This mixture was CFSE labeled and injected alone or with purified CD11b+ cells from mice injected with A20-HA or A20WT 28 days prior in a 1:1 ratio into Thy1.2 Balb/c mice. Splenocytes were examined three days later for Thy1.1 and Thy1.2 expression (right panel). Adoptively transferred “Tregs” can be identified as the Thy1.1+/Thy1.2- population while “effector” T cells by co-expression of Thy1.1 and Thy1.2. Proliferation of each population was determined by CFSE dilution. (D) 106 splenocytes were acquired and analyzed. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD of 3 mice.
Figure 5. IL4Rα expression on CD11b+ cells correlates with tumor progression and can be down-modulated by sildenafil
Mice were injected on day 0 with 106 A20-HA cells and either treated with sildenafil or left untreated. At the indicated time points, mice were sacrificed and splenocytes analyzed by FACS for (A) IgG2a expression - as a measure of tumor burden, or (B, C) for the co-expression CD11b, Gr1 and IL4Rα to determine MDSC expansion.
Figure 6. In vivo sildenafil administration reduces Treg proliferation and prevents T cell anergy
A) Experimental schema. Mice were injected with A20-HA (106cells) or PBS on day 0. All the mice received 2.5×106 HA-specific, Thy1.1+/+, CD4 purified T cells on day 10 and half were then administered sildenafil in the drinking water. On day 25 half of the mice in each group were vaccinated with VaccHA (107 PFU) and sacrificed 5 days later. (B) clonal expansion and (C) FOXP3 expression was evaluated by FACS analysis. (D) The experiment was repeated as described above with CFSE labeled clonotypic T cells. CD4+ T cells were purified on day 30 and CD4+/Thy1.1+/CFSElow cells were further purified by cell sorting. To evaluate their suppressive activity, 3×104 CFSElow cells were co-cultured with naïve HA-specific T cells in the presence of the relevant peptide and irradiated BALB/c splenocytes as feeder cells. IFN-γ production was evaluated 48h later by ELISA.
Similar articles
- Chronic inflammation promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cell activation blocking antitumor immunity in transgenic mouse melanoma model.
Meyer C, Sevko A, Ramacher M, Bazhin AV, Falk CS, Osen W, Borrello I, Kato M, Schadendorf D, Baniyash M, Umansky V. Meyer C, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 11;108(41):17111-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108121108. Epub 2011 Oct 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21969559 Free PMC article. - Monocytic CCR2(+) myeloid-derived suppressor cells promote immune escape by limiting activated CD8 T-cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment.
Lesokhin AM, Hohl TM, Kitano S, Cortez C, Hirschhorn-Cymerman D, Avogadri F, Rizzuto GA, Lazarus JJ, Pamer EG, Houghton AN, Merghoub T, Wolchok JD. Lesokhin AM, et al. Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 15;72(4):876-86. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1792. Epub 2011 Dec 15. Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 22174368 Free PMC article. - Induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by tumor exosomes.
Xiang X, Poliakov A, Liu C, Liu Y, Deng ZB, Wang J, Cheng Z, Shah SV, Wang GJ, Zhang L, Grizzle WE, Mobley J, Zhang HG. Xiang X, et al. Int J Cancer. 2009 Jun 1;124(11):2621-33. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24249. Int J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19235923 Free PMC article. - Antigen specificity of immune suppression by myeloid-derived suppressor cells.
Solito S, Bronte V, Mandruzzato S. Solito S, et al. J Leukoc Biol. 2011 Jul;90(1):31-6. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0111021. Epub 2011 Apr 12. J Leukoc Biol. 2011. PMID: 21486906 Review. - Targeting immune suppressing myeloid-derived suppressor cells in oncology.
Kao J, Ko EC, Eisenstein S, Sikora AG, Fu S, Chen SH. Kao J, et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Jan;77(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Mar 20. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011. PMID: 20304669 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Targeting amino acid-metabolizing enzymes for cancer immunotherapy.
Grobben Y. Grobben Y. Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1440269. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1440269. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39211039 Free PMC article. Review. - Role of Immune Cells and Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma.
Radhakrishnan V, Golla U, Kudva AK. Radhakrishnan V, et al. Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 1;14(4):461. doi: 10.3390/life14040461. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38672732 Free PMC article. Review. - Listeria-vectored cervical cancer vaccine candidate strains reduce MDSCs via the JAK-STAT signaling pathway.
Zhang Y, Lei Y, Ou Q, Chen M, Tian S, Tang J, Li R, Liang Q, Chen Z, Wang C. Zhang Y, et al. BMC Biol. 2024 Apr 19;22(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-01876-3. BMC Biol. 2024. PMID: 38641823 Free PMC article. - Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer: therapeutic targets to overcome tumor immune evasion.
Lu J, Luo Y, Rao D, Wang T, Lei Z, Chen X, Zhang B, Li Y, Liu B, Xia L, Huang W. Lu J, et al. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024 Apr 12;13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40164-024-00505-7. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38609997 Free PMC article. Review. - CAF-associated genes putatively representing distinct prognosis by in silico landscape of stromal components of colon cancer.
Okuno K, Ikemura K, Okamoto R, Oki K, Watanabe A, Kuroda Y, Kidachi M, Fujino S, Nie Y, Higuchi T, Chuman M, Washio M, Sakuraya M, Niihara M, Kumagai K, Sangai T, Kumamoto Y, Naitoh T, Hiki N, Yamashita K. Okuno K, et al. PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0299827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299827. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38557819 Free PMC article.
References
- Eisen HN, Sakato N, Hall SJ. Myeloma proteins as tumor-specific antigens. Transplant Proc. 1975;7:209–14. - PubMed
- Longo DL. Lymphoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 1997;9:389–91. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources