The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes - PubMed (original) (raw)
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324.
Donna G Rhodes, David J Baer, Theophile Murayi, John C Clemens, William V Rumpler, David R Paul, Rhonda S Sebastian, Kevin J Kuczynski, Linda A Ingwersen, Robert C Staples, Linda E Cleveland
Affiliations
- PMID: 18689367
- DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324
Free article
The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes
Alanna J Moshfegh et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug.
Free article
Abstract
Background: The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method (AMPM) is used for collecting 24-h dietary recalls in What We Eat In America, the dietary interview component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Because the data have important program and policy applications, it is essential that the validity of the method be tested.
Objective: The accuracy of the AMPM was evaluated by comparing reported energy intake (EI) with total energy expenditure (TEE) by using the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique.
Design: The 524 volunteers, aged 30-69 y, included an equal number of men and women recruited from the Washington, DC, area. Each subject was dosed with DLW on the first day of the 2-wk study period; three 24-h recalls were collected during the 2-wk period by using the AMPM. The first recall was conducted in person, and subsequent recalls were over the telephone.
Results: Overall, the subjects underreported EI by 11% compared with TEE. Normal-weight subjects [body mass index (in kg/m(2)) < 25] underreported EI by <3%. By using a linear mixed model, 95% CIs were determined for the ratio of EI to TEE. Approximately 78% of men and 74% of women were classified as acceptable energy reporters (within 95% CI of EI:TEE). Both the percentage by which energy was underreported and the percentage of subjects classified as low energy reporters (<95% CI of EI:TEE) were highest for subjects classified as obese (body mass index > 30).
Conclusions: Although the AMPM accurately reported EIs in normal-weight subjects, research is warranted to enhance its accuracy in overweight and obese persons.
Similar articles
- The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake.
Blanton CA, Moshfegh AJ, Baer DJ, Kretsch MJ. Blanton CA, et al. J Nutr. 2006 Oct;136(10):2594-9. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.10.2594. J Nutr. 2006. PMID: 16988132 - Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study.
Conway JM, Ingwersen LA, Moshfegh AJ. Conway JM, et al. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Apr;104(4):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.007. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004. PMID: 15054345 - Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.
Foster E, Lee C, Imamura F, Hollidge SE, Westgate KL, Venables MC, Poliakov I, Rowland MK, Osadchiy T, Bradley JC, Simpson EL, Adamson AJ, Olivier P, Wareham N, Forouhi NG, Brage S. Foster E, et al. J Nutr Sci. 2019 Aug 30;8:e29. doi: 10.1017/jns.2019.20. eCollection 2019. J Nutr Sci. 2019. PMID: 31501691 Free PMC article. - A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water.
Burrows TL, Martin RJ, Collins CE. Burrows TL, et al. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Oct;110(10):1501-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.008. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010. PMID: 20869489 Review. - Measurement Errors in Dietary Assessment Using Self-Reported 24-Hour Recalls in Low-Income Countries and Strategies for Their Prevention.
Gibson RS, Charrondiere UR, Bell W. Gibson RS, et al. Adv Nutr. 2017 Nov 15;8(6):980-991. doi: 10.3945/an.117.016980. Print 2017 Nov. Adv Nutr. 2017. PMID: 29141979 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Certain dietary patterns including potatoes are associated with higher and lower diet quality and physiological measures in children and adults, NHANES 2001-2018.
Fulgoni K, Fulgoni VL 3rd. Fulgoni K, et al. Front Nutr. 2022 Nov 10;9:987861. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.987861. eCollection 2022. Front Nutr. 2022. PMID: 36438770 Free PMC article. - Trends in energy intake among adults in the United States: findings from NHANES.
Ford ES, Dietz WH. Ford ES, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;97(4):848-53. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.052662. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013. PMID: 23426032 Free PMC article. - The accuracy of the Goldberg method for classifying misreporters of energy intake on a food frequency questionnaire and 24-h recalls: comparison with doubly labeled water.
Tooze JA, Krebs-Smith SM, Troiano RP, Subar AF. Tooze JA, et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 May;66(5):569-76. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.198. Epub 2011 Nov 30. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012. PMID: 22127332 Free PMC article. - Rationale, design and methods for the RIGHT Track Health Study: pathways from childhood self-regulation to cardiovascular risk in adolescence.
Wideman L, Calkins SD, Janssen JA, Lovelady CA, Dollar JM, Keane SP, Perrin EM, Shanahan L. Wideman L, et al. BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 1;16:459. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3133-7. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27246836 Free PMC article. - Dietary Diversity and Micronutrients Adequacy in Women of Childbearing Age: Results from ELANS Study.
Gómez G, Nogueira Previdelli Á, Fisberg RM, Kovalskys I, Fisberg M, Herrera-Cuenca M, Cortés Sanabria LY, Yépez García MC, Rigotti A, Liria-Domínguez MR, Guajardo V, Quesada D, Murillo AG, Brenes JC. Gómez G, et al. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 4;12(7):1994. doi: 10.3390/nu12071994. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32635544 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical