Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2009 Jun;136(2):245-57.
doi: 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
Affiliations
- PMID: 18704696
- DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0
Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response
Mike Goddard. Genetica. 2009 Jun.
Abstract
Genomic selection refers to the use of dense markers covering the whole genome to estimate the breeding value of selection candidates for a quantitative trait. This paper considers prediction of breeding value based on a linear combination of the markers. In this case the best estimate of each marker's effect is the expectation of the effect conditional on the data. To calculate this requires a prior distribution of marker effects. If the marker effects are normally distributed with constant variance, BLUP can be used to calculate the estimated effects of the markers and hence the estimated breeding value (EBV). In this case the model is equivalent to a conventional animal model in which the relationship matrix among the animals is estimated from the markers instead of the pedigree. The accuracy of the EBV can approach 1.0 but a very large amount of data is required. An alternative model was investigated in which only some markers have non-zero effects and these effects follow a reflected exponential distribution. In this case the expected effect of a marker is a non-linear function of the data such that apparently small effects are regressed back almost to zero and consequently these markers can be deleted from the model. The accuracy in this case is considerably higher than when marker effects are normally distributed. If genomic selection is practiced for several generations the response declines in a manner that can be predicted from the marker allele frequencies. Genomic selection is likely to lead to a more rapid decline in the selection response than phenotypic selection unless new markers are continually added to the prediction of breeding value. A method to find the optimum index to maximise long term selection response is derived. This index varies the weight given to a marker according to its frequency such that markers where the favourable allele has low frequency receive more weight in the index.
Similar articles
- Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
Meuwissen THE, Indahl UG, Ødegård J. Meuwissen THE, et al. Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Dec 27;49(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0369-3. Genet Sel Evol. 2017. PMID: 29281962 Free PMC article. - Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S, Meuwissen TH, Luan T, Ødegård J. Vela-Avitúa S, et al. Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Feb 25;47(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0084-2. Genet Sel Evol. 2015. PMID: 25888184 Free PMC article. - Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS, Bovenhuis H, van Son M, Nordbø Ø, Grindflek EH, Knol EF, Bastiaansen JW. Lopes MS, et al. J Anim Sci. 2017 Jan;95(1):59-71. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.0754. J Anim Sci. 2017. PMID: 28177367 - Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Hayes BJ, et al. J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1646. J Dairy Sci. 2009. PMID: 19164653 Review. - Genomic selection.
Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Goddard ME, et al. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007 Dec;124(6):323-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00702.x. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007. PMID: 18076469 Review.
Cited by
- Triumphs of genomic-assisted breeding in crop improvement.
Mangal V, Verma LK, Singh SK, Saxena K, Roy A, Karn A, Rohit R, Kashyap S, Bhatt A, Sood S. Mangal V, et al. Heliyon. 2024 Aug 5;10(15):e35513. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35513. eCollection 2024 Aug 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39170454 Free PMC article. Review. - Stacked generalization as a computational method for the genomic selection.
Kim S, Chu SH, Park YJ, Lee CY. Kim S, et al. Front Genet. 2024 Jul 10;15:1401470. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1401470. eCollection 2024. Front Genet. 2024. PMID: 39050246 Free PMC article. - Genomic predictions under different genetic architectures are impacted by mating designs.
Ansari S, Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N, Shadparvar AA. Ansari S, et al. Vet Anim Sci. 2024 Jun 19;25:100373. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100373. eCollection 2024 Sep. Vet Anim Sci. 2024. PMID: 39036417 Free PMC article. - Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs.
Wang X, Zhang Z, Du H, Pfeiffer C, Mészáros G, Ding X. Wang X, et al. Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Jun 26;56(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00915-5. Genet Sel Evol. 2024. PMID: 38926647 Free PMC article. - Single nucleotide polymorphism profile for quantitative trait nucleotide in populations with small effective size and its impact on mapping and genomic predictions.
Pocrnic I, Lourenco D, Misztal I. Pocrnic I, et al. Genetics. 2024 Aug 7;227(4):iyae103. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyae103. Genetics. 2024. PMID: 38913695 Free PMC article.
References
- Theor Popul Biol. 1971 Jun;2(2):125-41 - PubMed
- J Anim Sci. 2004;82 E-Suppl:E313-328 - PubMed
- Genet Res. 2004 Oct;84(2):109-16 - PubMed
- Genet Res. 2006 Oct;88(2):105-18 - PubMed
- J Anim Breed Genet. 2007 Dec;124(6):323-30 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources