Key issues in conducting a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray datasets - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Key issues in conducting a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray datasets
Adaikalavan Ramasamy et al. PLoS Med. 2008.
Abstract
Adaikalavan Ramasamy and colleagues outline seven key issues and suggest a stepwise approach in conducting a meta-analysis of microarray datasets.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Figure 1. The Flow from Data to Information to Biological Knowledge in Gene Expression Microarray Research
The image files are obtained from optical scanning of hybridized samples.
Figure 2. Data Acquisition to Summarize Steps 3–10 in Table 3
In total, 21 studies (6 + 3 + 8 + 4) are included in the meta-analysis. The characteristics of the included studies are given in Table 4.
Figure 3. A Summary Plot of the Pooled Effect Size (Black Dots) and Its 95% Confidence Interval (Gray Bars) Sorted by the FDR
The GenBank identifier (if available) for the top five most statistically significant up-regulated and down-regulated genes is shown.
Figure 4. Forest Plot of the Most Statistically Significant Up-Regulated and Down-Regulated Genes Identified from the Meta-Analysis
References
- Schena M, Shalon D, Davis R, Brown P. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 1995;270:467–470. - PubMed
- Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, et al. Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science. 1999;286:531–537. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources