Attention set for number: expectation and perceptual load in inattentional blindness - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
. 2008 Oct;34(5):1092-107.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1092.
Affiliations
- PMID: 18823197
- DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1092
Clinical Trial
Attention set for number: expectation and perceptual load in inattentional blindness
Rebekah C White et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct.
Abstract
Inattentional blindness is the failure to detect unexpected events when attention is otherwise engaged. Previous research indicates that inattentional blindness increases as perceptual demands intensify. The authors present 6 cuing experiments that manipulated both the perceptual demands of a primary letter-naming task and the expectations of the individual. Inattentional blindness was greatest for individuals who held a numerical expectation that was consistent with the number of primary-task items presented. Expectation also affected detection differentially at various levels of perceptual load: Detection at moderate and high perceptual load was significantly affected by expectation, whereas detection at low perceptual load was not. The authors suggest that at moderate to high levels of perceptual load, individuals whose numerical expectations are fulfilled terminate processing when the primary task is complete, at the expense of the unexpected visual event. These experiments provide compelling evidence that expectations do affect detection of an unexpected stimulus, and they are the first to demonstrate that individuals set their attention for the number of items to be detected and are vulnerable to inattentional blindness whenever their primary-task numerical expectation is fulfilled.
Similar articles
- The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness.
Cartwright-Finch U, Lavie N. Cartwright-Finch U, et al. Cognition. 2007 Mar;102(3):321-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 Feb 14. Cognition. 2007. PMID: 16480973 Clinical Trial. - Task-irrelevant memory load induces inattentional blindness without temporo-parietal suppression.
Matsuyoshi D, Ikeda T, Sawamoto N, Kakigi R, Fukuyama H, Osaka N. Matsuyoshi D, et al. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Aug;48(10):3094-101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.021. Epub 2010 Jun 22. Neuropsychologia. 2010. PMID: 20600188 - Looking without seeing or seeing without looking? Eye movements in sustained inattentional blindness.
Beanland V, Pammer K. Beanland V, et al. Vision Res. 2010 May 12;50(10):977-88. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.024. Epub 2010 Mar 4. Vision Res. 2010. PMID: 20206648 - Inattentional blindness on the full-attention trial: Are we throwing out the baby with the bathwater?
White RC, Davies M, Aimola Davies AM. White RC, et al. Conscious Cogn. 2018 Mar;59:64-77. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.10.002. Epub 2018 Jan 9. Conscious Cogn. 2018. PMID: 29329969 Review. - Implicit processing during inattentional blindness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nobre AP, de Melo GM, Gauer G, Wagemans J. Nobre AP, et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Dec;119:355-375. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 18. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020. PMID: 33086130 Review.
Cited by
- The invisible breast cancer: Experience does not protect against inattentional blindness to clinically relevant findings in radiology.
Williams L, Carrigan A, Auffermann W, Mills M, Rich A, Elmore J, Drew T. Williams L, et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):503-511. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01826-4. Epub 2020 Nov 2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021. PMID: 33140228 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources