A formal ontology of subcellular neuroanatomy - PubMed (original) (raw)
A formal ontology of subcellular neuroanatomy
Stephen D Larson et al. Front Neuroinform. 2007.
Abstract
The complexity of the nervous system requires high-resolution microscopy to resolve the detailed 3D structure of nerve cells and supracellular domains. The analysis of such imaging data to extract cellular surfaces and cell components often requires the combination of expert human knowledge with carefully engineered software tools. In an effort to make better tools to assist humans in this endeavor, create a more accessible and permanent record of their data, and to aid the process of constructing complex and detailed computational models, we have created a core of formalized knowledge about the structure of the nervous system and have integrated that core into several software applications. In this paper, we describe the structure and content of a formal ontology whose scope is the subcellular anatomy of the nervous system (SAO), covering nerve cells, their parts, and interactions between these parts. Many applications of this ontology to image annotation, content-based retrieval of structural data, and integration of shared data across scales and researchers are also described.
Keywords: data integration; electron microscopy; neuroanatomy; neuronal cell types; subcellular anatomy.
Figures
Figure 1
Multiple representations of the same medium spiny neuron taken from the CCDB. In (A), a light-level fill of the neuron. The yellow box shows the portion of the dendritic branch shown in (C). In (B), the Neurolucida segmentation of that neuron. In (C), the EM image of the portion of the dendrite featured in (A). In (D), the 3D reconstruction of the dendrite from (C) after segmentation.
Figure 2
High level class structure of the SAO. The BFO entities are shown in (A) and in the green and pink boxes in (B). Spatial regions, subclasses of occurrents, and subclasses of realizable entity have been omitted because the SAO does not currently use them. SAO classes that are under the BFO hierarchy are shown in blue in (B).
Figure 3
Diagram of a Node of Ranvier instance description in the SAO. The boxes indicate instances of classes that are related to one another as a description of a particular instance of a Node of Ranvier. The blue text indicates relationships that are enforced between classes through the use of OWL restrictions, while the black text indicates relationships defined for this instance alone.
Figure 4
Diagram of a chemical synapse instance description in SAO. Sites are indicated by green backgrounds. The boxes indicate Instances of classes that are related to one another as a description of a particular instance of a chemical synapse.
Figure 5
Inferred hierarchies using OWL. On the left, a subset of the hierarchy under the Neuron class prior to inference. On the right, the automatic reclassification of that subset under four user-defined groupings, GlutamatergicNeuron, GABAergicNeuron, SpinyCell, GranuleCell, based on the properties of the cells alone.
Similar articles
- Ontologies for Neuroscience: What are they and What are they Good for?
Larson SD, Martone ME. Larson SD, et al. Front Neurosci. 2009 May 1;3(1):60-7. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.007.2009. eCollection 2009 May. Front Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19753098 Free PMC article. - Clinical data integration model. Core interoperability ontology for research using primary care data.
Ethier JF, Curcin V, Barton A, McGilchrist MM, Bastiaens H, Andreasson A, Rossiter J, Zhao L, Arvanitis TN, Taweel A, Delaney BC, Burgun A. Ethier JF, et al. Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(1):16-23. doi: 10.3414/ME13-02-0024. Epub 2014 Jun 18. Methods Inf Med. 2015. PMID: 24954896 - Generation, description and storage of dendritic morphology data.
Ascoli GA, Krichmar JL, Nasuto SJ, Senft SL. Ascoli GA, et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 29;356(1412):1131-45. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0905. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001. PMID: 11545695 Free PMC article. Review. - Drug target ontology to classify and integrate drug discovery data.
Lin Y, Mehta S, Küçük-McGinty H, Turner JP, Vidovic D, Forlin M, Koleti A, Nguyen DT, Jensen LJ, Guha R, Mathias SL, Ursu O, Stathias V, Duan J, Nabizadeh N, Chung C, Mader C, Visser U, Yang JJ, Bologa CG, Oprea TI, Schürer SC. Lin Y, et al. J Biomed Semantics. 2017 Nov 9;8(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13326-017-0161-x. J Biomed Semantics. 2017. PMID: 29122012 Free PMC article. - Ontology annotation: mapping genomic regions to biological function.
Thomas PD, Mi H, Lewis S. Thomas PD, et al. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007 Feb;11(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.11.039. Epub 2007 Jan 5. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007. PMID: 17208035 Review.
Cited by
- Toward knowledge support for analysis and interpretation of complex traits.
Collier N, Oellrich A, Groza T. Collier N, et al. Genome Biol. 2013;14(9):214. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-214. Genome Biol. 2013. PMID: 24079802 Free PMC article. Review. - The NIFSTD and BIRNLex vocabularies: building comprehensive ontologies for neuroscience.
Bug WJ, Ascoli GA, Grethe JS, Gupta A, Fennema-Notestine C, Laird AR, Larson SD, Rubin D, Shepherd GM, Turner JA, Martone ME. Bug WJ, et al. Neuroinformatics. 2008 Sep;6(3):175-94. doi: 10.1007/s12021-008-9032-z. Epub 2008 Oct 31. Neuroinformatics. 2008. PMID: 18975148 Free PMC article. - Ontologies for Neuroscience: What are they and What are they Good for?
Larson SD, Martone ME. Larson SD, et al. Front Neurosci. 2009 May 1;3(1):60-7. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.007.2009. eCollection 2009 May. Front Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19753098 Free PMC article. - Invertebrate neurophylogeny: suggested terms and definitions for a neuroanatomical glossary.
Richter S, Loesel R, Purschke G, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Scholtz G, Stach T, Vogt L, Wanninger A, Brenneis G, Döring C, Faller S, Fritsch M, Grobe P, Heuer CM, Kaul S, Møller OS, Müller CH, Rieger V, Rothe BH, Stegner ME, Harzsch S. Richter S, et al. Front Zool. 2010 Nov 9;7:29. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-29. Front Zool. 2010. PMID: 21062451 Free PMC article. - Spatio-structural granularity of biological material entities.
Vogt L. Vogt L. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 May 28;11:289. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-289. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010. PMID: 20509878 Free PMC article.
References
- Bota M., Dong H. W., Swanson L. W. (2005). Brain architecture management system. Neuroinformatics 3, 15–48 - PubMed
- Bowden D. M., Dubach M. F. (2003). NeuroNames 2002. Neuroinformatics 1, 43–59 - PubMed
- Chen L., Martone M. E., Gupta A., Fong L., Wong-Barnum M. (2006). OntoQuest: exploring ontological data made easy. Abstract, Very Large Databases Conference1183–1186
Grants and funding
- R01 NS058296/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- P41 LM007885/LM/NLM NIH HHS/United States
- U24 RR021760/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- P41 RR004050/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- R01 DA016602/DA/NIDA NIH HHS/United States
- P41 RR008605/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources