Animal models of gene-nutrient interactions - PubMed (original) (raw)
Animal models of gene-nutrient interactions
Danielle R Reed. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Dec.
Abstract
Food intake of humans is governed by the food's nutritional value and pleasing taste, but also by other factors such as food cost and availability, cultural imperatives, and social status. The biological determinants of human food intake are not easily parsed from these other factors, making them hard to study against the whirligig aspects of human life in a modern age. The study of animals provides a useful alternative. Humans have a history of studying animal food intake, for agricultural reasons (e.g., pigs and cows), and for personal reasons (e.g., dogs and cats), and these practical concerns have been joined with the appreciation that other models can teach us the principles of behavior, genetics, and nutrition. Thus there is a steady use of the traditional animal models in this type of research, as well as growth in the use of other systems such as worms and flies. Rats and mice occupy a special niche as animal models for two reasons; first, they share with humans a love of the same types of food, and second, they are the target of a number of well-developed genetic tools. The available genetic tools that make mice a popular model include a well-annotated genome (Mouse Build 37), profiles of RNA expression from many tissues, a diverse panel of inbred strains, and the ability to manipulate genes in the whole animal, including removing a gene only in specific tissues (e.g., Cre-lox system). Mice have been harnessed to find genotypes that contribute to sweet-liking, and other studies are underway to understand how genetic variation might at least partially explain other puzzles of human appetites. Animal models provide a way to study the genetic determinants of food selection with experimental rigor and therefore complement human genetics studies.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure
The author declared no conflict of interest.
Figures
Figure 1
The point illustrated is the hypothetical effect of particular genotypes on the intake of certain types of food. "Yummy" refers to food that is regarded by most people as especially desirable to eat, like sweet foods or savory meats, whereas "Yucky" refers to food that is regarded by most people as less desirable, like bitter vegetables or unripe fruit. A definition of "genotype" is found in the text.
Figure 2
The results of a query of a database of biomedical research (PubMed, see Electronic Resources) using the common species name (e.g., human or cow), "nutrition" and "genetics" as keywords. The number of publications returned from the query is shown on the _Y_-axis. Species are displayed alphabetically on the _X_-axis. Note the log scale.
Similar articles
- Association of TAS2R38 variants with sweet food intake in children aged 1-6 years.
Pawellek I, Grote V, Rzehak P, Xhonneux A, Verduci E, Stolarczyk A, Closa-Monasterolo R, Reischl E, Koletzko B; European Childhood Obesity Trial Study Group. Pawellek I, et al. Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:126-134. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.034. Epub 2016 Jul 28. Appetite. 2016. PMID: 27475756 - Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review. - Genetic variation in taste perception: does it have a role in healthy eating?
Feeney E, O'Brien S, Scannell A, Markey A, Gibney ER. Feeney E, et al. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011 Feb;70(1):135-43. doi: 10.1017/S0029665110003976. Epub 2010 Nov 22. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011. PMID: 21092367 Review. - Nutrigenomics and personalized diets: What will they mean for food?
German JB, Zivkovic AM, Dallas DC, Smilowitz JT. German JB, et al. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2011;2:97-123. doi: 10.1146/annurev.food.102308.124147. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2011. PMID: 22129377 Free PMC article. Review. - Genetic variance contributes to ingestive processes: a survey of eleven inbred mouse strains for fat (Intralipid) intake.
Lewis SR, Dym C, Chai C, Singh A, Kest B, Bodnar RJ. Lewis SR, et al. Physiol Behav. 2007 Jan 30;90(1):82-94. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.028. Epub 2006 Oct 9. Physiol Behav. 2007. PMID: 17028044
Cited by
- Gene-nutrition and gene-physical activity interactions in the etiology of obesity. Introduction.
Agurs-Collins T, Bouchard C. Agurs-Collins T, et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Dec;16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S2-4. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.510. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008. PMID: 19037207 Free PMC article. No abstract available. - Macronutrient choice of BTBR.NZW mice congenic for a 21-gene region of chromosome 17.
Tordoff MG, Jaji SA, Marks JM, Ellis HT. Tordoff MG, et al. Physiol Behav. 2012 Jun 25;106(4):556-61. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.030. Epub 2012 Apr 4. Physiol Behav. 2012. PMID: 22504492 Free PMC article. - Picky eating during childhood: a longitudinal study to age 11 years.
Mascola AJ, Bryson SW, Agras WS. Mascola AJ, et al. Eat Behav. 2010 Dec;11(4):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 May 27. Eat Behav. 2010. PMID: 20850060 Free PMC article. - Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.
Reed DR, Knaapila A. Reed DR, et al. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2010;94:213-40. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375003-7.00008-X. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2010. PMID: 21036327 Free PMC article. Review. - Single-Subject Studies in Translational Nutrition Research.
Schork NJ, Goetz LH. Schork NJ, et al. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017 Aug 21;37:395-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064717. Epub 2017 Jul 17. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28715990 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Robinson TN, Borzekowski DL, Matheson DM, Kraemer HC. Effects of fast food branding on young children's taste preferences. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:792–797. - PubMed
- Wansink B, Painter JE, Lee YK. The office candy dish: proximity's influence on estimated and actual consumption. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006;30:871–875. - PubMed
- Williams RJ. Biochemical Individuality; The Basis for the Genetotrophic Concept. New York: Wiley; 1956.
- Cawley S, Bekiranov S, Ng HH, et al. Unbiased mapping of transcription factor binding sites along human chromosomes 21 and 22 points to widespread regulation of noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2004;116:499–509. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous