Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics - PubMed (original) (raw)

Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics

Samuel F Bakhoum et al. Nat Cell Biol. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Most solid tumours are aneuploid and many frequently mis-segregate chromosomes. This chromosomal instability is commonly caused by persistent mal-oriented attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules. Chromosome segregation requires stable microtubule attachment at kinetochores, yet those attachments must be sufficiently dynamic to permit correction of mal-orientations. How this balance is achieved is unknown, and the permissible boundaries of attachment stability versus dynamics essential for genome stability remain poorly understood. Here we show that two microtubule-depolymerizing kinesins, Kif2b and MCAK, stimulate kinetochore-microtubule dynamics during distinct phases of mitosis to correct mal-orientations. Few-fold reductions in kinetochore-microtubule turnover, particularly in early mitosis, induce severe chromosome segregation defects. In addition, we show that stimulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores restores stability to chromosomally unstable tumour cell lines, establishing a causal relationship between deregulation of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and chromosomal instability. Thus, temporal control of microtubule attachment to chromosomes during mitosis is central to genome stability in human cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1. Lagging chromosomes in the absence of Kif2b and MCAK

a, Anaphase spindles of both untreated and Kif2b-deficient U2OS cells containing CenpB-GFP to indicate kinetochores and stained for microtubules and DNA. White arrow highlights merotelic kinetochores. For clarity, a cell with only 2 lagging chromosomes was selected for this panel. b, Anaphase and pre-anaphase cells of both untreated and Kif2b-deficient RPE1 cells following recovery from nocodazole treatment stained for kinetochores with CREST, cyclin B, and DNA. c, d, Number of anaphase U2OS cells with lagging kinetochores (c) and the average number of laggards per anaphase (d) in untreated cells (blue) or cells following recovery from monastrol (green) or nocodazole (red) treatment. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m, n = 150 cells, 3 experiments. Scale bars, 5 μm.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Kif2b is required for correction of attachment errors

a, Spindles of untreated (Control), MCAK-deficient (MCAK RNAi), and Kif2b-deficient (Kif2b RNAi) U2OS cells in the presence of monastrol (top panels) or after recovery from monastrol treatment (bottom panels). b, Number of cells with bipolar spindles that failed to align chromosomes with no treatment (blue) or following recovery from monastrol treatment (red). c, Spindles of untreated (Control), MCAK-deficient (MCAK RNAi), and Kif2b-deficient (Kif2b RNAi) cells following recovery from monastrol treatment in the presence of hesperadin (top panels) and then followed by recovery from hesperadin treatment (bottom panels). d, Number of bipolar cells that failed to align chromosomes after monastrol washout in the presence of hesperadin (blue) and then after recovery from hesperadin treatment (red). Bars in b and d represent mean ± s.e.m, n = 600, 3 experiments cells for b, 100 cells, 2 experiments for d. Scale bars, 5 μm. *, p < 0.0002, t-test.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Kinetochore localization of GFP-Kif2b is sensitive to the Aurora-inhibitor, Hesperadin

Monopolar spindles induced with monastrol showing microtubules (red), GFP-Kif2b (green), and DNA (blue) in the presence of hesperadin and following removal of hesperadin. Scale bar, 5 μm.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Temporal regulation of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics

a, Differential interference contrast (D.I.C.) and time-lapse fluorescent images of prometaphase spindles in untreated (Control) and Kif2b-deficient (Kif2b RNAi) U2OS cells before (Pre-PA) and at the indicated times (sec) after activation (Post-PA) of GFP-tubulin fluorescence. Scale bar, 5 μm. b, Normalized fluorescence intensity over time after photoactivation of spindles in untreated (filled squares), MCAK-deficient (filled circles), and Kif2b-deficient (white squares) prometaphase and metaphase cells. Datapoints represent mean ± s.e.m, n = 5 to 11 cells. c, Calculated kMT half-life under different conditions. Error bars represent S.E. from the regression analysis in b.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Suppression of chromosome mis-segregation in cancer cell lines

a, b, Percent of anaphase cells with lagging kinetochores and average numbers of lagging chromosomes in anaphase of U2OS cells from representative experiments. Clone 5 and clone 8 are from Table 1. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m, n = 150 cells, 3 experiments (a) and bars represent values from 100 cells, 2 experiements (b), *, p < 0.05, t-test. **c,** Examples of a proper chromosome segregation in U2OS cells expressing GFP-MCAK (left panel) and mis-segregation event in U2OS cells expressing GFP-Kif2a (right panel) using FISH with probes for chromosomes 2 (green) and 3 (red) and DNA stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 10 μm. **d,** Mis-segregation rates per chromosome per mitosis in untreated U2OS cells and U2OS cells overexpressing GFP-Kif2a, GFP-Kif2b, GFP-MCAK, or GFP-tubulin as indicated. Clone 5 and clone 8 are from Table 1. n > 660 cells. *, p < 0.05, Chi-square test. e, Model for temporal regulation of kMT dynamics. At low inter-kinetochore tension during prometaphase, the Aurora B kinase activity gradient recruits Kif2b to kinetochores and inhibits centromeric MCAK. The tension generated upon biorientation causes sister kinetochores to exceed the boundaries of the Aurora B kinase activity gradient releasing Kif2b from kinetochores and activating a subset of MCAK in the outer centromere. Kinetochores are shown in grey and microtubules are shown in green.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman.
    1. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 1998;396:643–649. - PubMed
    1. Storchova Z, Pellman D. From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;5:45–54. - PubMed
    1. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancer. Nature. 1997;386:623–627. - PubMed
    1. Gao C, et al. Chromosome instability, chromosome transcriptome, and clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:8995–9000. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources