How do gamblers end gambling: longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems - PubMed (original) (raw)

How do gamblers end gambling: longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems

Ziming Xuan et al. J Gambl Stud. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To examine behavioral patterns of actual Internet gamblers who experienced gambling-related problems and voluntarily closed their accounts.

Design: A nested case-control design was used to compare gamblers who closed their accounts because of gambling problems to those who maintained open accounts.

Setting: Actual play patterns of in vivo Internet gamblers who subscribed to an Internet gambling site.

Participants: 226 gamblers who closed accounts due to gambling problems were selected from a cohort of 47,603 Internet gamblers who subscribed to an Internet gambling site during February 2005; 226 matched-case controls were selected from the group of gamblers who did not close their accounts. Daily aggregates of behavioral data were collected during an 18-month study period.

Main outcome measures: Main outcomes of interest were daily aggregates of stake, odds, and net loss, which were standardized by the daily aggregate number of bets. We also examined the number of bets to measure trajectory of gambling frequency.

Results: Account closers due to gambling problems experienced increasing monetary loss as the time to closure approached; they also increased their stake per bet. Yet they did not chase longer odds; their choices of wagers were more probabilistically conservative (i.e., short odds) compared with the controls. The changes of monetary involvement and risk preference occurred concurrently during the last few days prior to voluntary closing.

Conclusions: Our finding of an involvement-seeking yet risk-averse tendency among self-identified problem gamblers challenges the notion that problem gamblers seek "long odds" during "chasing."

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Real limits in the virtual world: self-limiting behavior of Internet gamblers.
  Nelson SE, LaPlante DA, Peller AJ, Schumann A, LaBrie RA, Shaffer HJ. Nelson SE, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2008 Dec;24(4):463-77. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9106-8. Epub 2008 Aug 12. J Gambl Stud. 2008. PMID: 18696219
• Using neural networks to model the behavior and decisions of gamblers, in particular, cyber-gamblers.
  Chan VK. Chan VK. J Gambl Stud. 2010 Mar;26(1):35-52. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9139-7. Epub 2009 Jul 11. J Gambl Stud. 2010. PMID: 19593655
• Assessing the playing field: a prospective longitudinal study of internet sports gambling behavior.
  LaBrie RA, LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, Schumann A, Shaffer HJ. LaBrie RA, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2007 Sep;23(3):347-62. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9067-3. Epub 2007 Jun 17. J Gambl Stud. 2007. PMID: 17574522
• [Internet gambling: what are the risks?].
  Bonnaire C. Bonnaire C. Encephale. 2012 Feb;38(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Apr 8. Encephale. 2012. PMID: 22381723 Review. French.
• Motivators for resolving or seeking help for gambling problems: a review of the empirical literature.
  Suurvali H, Hodgins DC, Cunningham JA. Suurvali H, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2010 Mar;26(1):1-33. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9151-y. Epub 2009 Sep 20. J Gambl Stud. 2010. PMID: 19768660 Review.

Cited by

• Towards an Active Role of Financial Institutions in Preventing Problem Gambling: A Proposed Conceptual Framework and Taxonomy of Financial Wellbeing Indicators.
  Lakew N, Jonsson J, Lindner P. Lakew N, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2024 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10312-8. Online ahead of print. J Gambl Stud. 2024. PMID: 38767773 Review.
• Unmasking Risky Habits: Identifying and Predicting Problem Gamblers Through Machine Learning Techniques.
  Sándor MC, Bakó B. Sándor MC, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1367-1377. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10297-4. Epub 2024 Apr 3. J Gambl Stud. 2024. PMID: 38568337 Free PMC article.
• Behavioural Tracking and Profiling Studies Involving Objective Data Derived from Online Operators: A Review of the Evidence.
  Delfabbro P, Parke J, Catania M. Delfabbro P, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):639-671. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10247-6. Epub 2023 Aug 27. J Gambl Stud. 2024. PMID: 37634166 Free PMC article. Review.
• Predicting self-exclusion among online gamblers: An empirical real-world study.
  Hopfgartner N, Auer M, Griffiths MD, Helic D. Hopfgartner N, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2023 Mar;39(1):447-465. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10149-z. Epub 2022 Aug 10. J Gambl Stud. 2023. PMID: 35947331 Free PMC article.
• Consumer Profile Segmentation in Online Lottery Gambling Utilizing Behavioral Tracking Data from the Portuguese National Lottery.
  Chagas BT, Gomes JFS, Griffiths MD. Chagas BT, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2022 Sep;38(3):917-939. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10072-9. Epub 2021 Sep 13. J Gambl Stud. 2022. PMID: 34518986 Free PMC article.

References

1. 1. Can J Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;53(1):52-60 - PubMed
2. 1. J Gambl Stud. 2003 Winter;19(4):359-86 - PubMed
3. 1. BMJ. 2004 Nov 6;329(7474):1055-6 - PubMed
4. 1. Addiction. 2002 May;97(5):487-99 - PubMed
5. 1. J Gambl Stud. 2007 Sep;23(3):347-62 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.
  • Springer

• Medical

  • MedlinePlus Health Information