Vision 20/20: proton therapy - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Vision 20/20: proton therapy
Alfred R Smith. Med Phys. 2009 Feb.
Abstract
The first patients were treated with proton beams in 1955 at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in California. In 1970, proton beams began to be used in research facilities to treat cancer patients using fractionated treatment regimens. It was not until 1990 that proton treatments were carried out in hospital-based facilities using technology and techniques that were comparable to those for modern photon therapy. Clinical data strongly support the conclusion that proton therapy is superior to conventional radiation therapy in a number of disease sites. Treatment planning studies have shown that proton dose distributions are superior to those for photons in a wide range of disease sites indicating that additional clinical gains can be achieved if these treatment plans can be reliably delivered to patients. Optimum proton dose distributions can be achieved with intensity modulated protons (IMPT), but very few patients have received this advanced form of treatment. It is anticipated widespread implementation of IMPT would provide additional improvements in clinical outcomes. Advances in the last decade have led to an increased interest in proton therapy. Currently, proton therapy is undergoing transitions that will move it into the mainstream of cancer treatment. For example, proton therapy is now reimbursed, there has been rapid development in proton therapy technology, and many new options are available for equipment, facility configuration, and financing. During the next decade, new developments will increase the efficiency and accuracy of proton therapy and enhance our ability to verify treatment planning calculations and perform quality assurance for proton therapy delivery. With the implementation of new multi-institution clinical studies and the routine availability of IMPT, it may be possible, within the next decade, to quantify the clinical gains obtained from optimized proton therapy. During this same period several new proton therapy facilities will be built and the cost of proton therapy is expected to decrease, making proton therapy routinely available to a larger population of cancer patients.
Similar articles
- Treatment planning for conformal proton radiation therapy.
Bussière MR, Adams JA. Bussière MR, et al. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Oct;2(5):389-99. doi: 10.1177/153303460300200504. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2003. PMID: 14529304 - Dose conformation of intensity-modulated stereotactic photon beams, proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton beams for intracranial lesions.
Baumert BG, Norton IA, Lomax AJ, Davis JB. Baumert BG, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15;60(4):1314-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.212. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 15519805 - Photon and proton therapy planning comparison for malignant glioma based on CT, FDG-PET, DTI-MRI and fiber tracking.
Munck Af Rosenschöld P, Engelholm S, Ohlhues L, Law I, Vogelius I, Engelholm SA. Munck Af Rosenschöld P, et al. Acta Oncol. 2011 Aug;50(6):777-83. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.584555. Acta Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21767174 - Dose to normal tissues outside the radiation therapy patient's treated volume: a review of different radiation therapy techniques.
Purdy JA. Purdy JA. Health Phys. 2008 Nov;95(5):666-76. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000326342.47348.06. Health Phys. 2008. PMID: 18849701 Review. - [Coming technical advances in radiation oncology].
Suit H. Suit H. Z Med Phys. 2005;15(4):215-27. doi: 10.1078/0939-3889-00281. Z Med Phys. 2005. PMID: 16422350 Review. German.
Cited by
- Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.
Shen C, Li B, Chen L, Yang M, Lou Y, Jia X. Shen C, et al. Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):1491-1503. doi: 10.1002/mp.12796. Epub 2018 Feb 23. Med Phys. 2018. PMID: 29405340 Free PMC article. - A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries.
Westerly DC, Mo X, Tomé WA, Mackie TR, DeLuca PM Jr. Westerly DC, et al. Med Phys. 2013 Jun;40(6):061706. doi: 10.1118/1.4804055. Med Phys. 2013. PMID: 23718585 Free PMC article. - Dosimetric impact of random spot positioning errors in intensity modulated proton therapy plans of small and large volume tumors.
Arjunan M, Krishnan G, Sharma DS, M P N, Patro KC, Thiyagarajan R, Srinivas C, Jalali R. Arjunan M, et al. Br J Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;94(1119):20201031. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201031. Epub 2021 Feb 2. Br J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33529057 Free PMC article. - A Review of Proton Therapy - Current Status and Future Directions.
Mohan R. Mohan R. Precis Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jun;6(2):164-176. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1149. Epub 2022 Apr 27. Precis Radiat Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36160180 Free PMC article. - Range-shifter effects on the stray field in proton therapy measured with the variance-covariance method.
Eliasson L, Lillhök J, Bäck T, Billnert-Maróti R, Dasu A, Liszka M. Eliasson L, et al. Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 2;12:882230. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882230. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35982965 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources