Using quality improvement techniques to increase colon cancer screening - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Using quality improvement techniques to increase colon cancer screening
Michael P Pignone et al. Am J Med. 2009 May.
Abstract
Screening has been shown to be effective and cost-effective in reducing the incidence of, and mortality from, colorectal cancer. Despite its demonstrated efficacy, colon cancer screening remains underused, with fewer than 60% of age-eligible adults reporting being up to date with recommended screening tests. Several factors account for the low rates of utilization, including patient, provider and system-related issues. Several interventions have been shown to be effective in overcoming these barriers, including the use of patient decision aids. Patient decision aids are tools designed to provide information to patients about screening options, help them consider the pros and cons of the alternatives, and assist them to reach a decision consistent with their values. The use of decision aids in clinical practice can increase screening rates by up to 14 percentage points. Mailing the decision aids to patients in advance of office visits appears to be a cost-effective means of implementation.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interests
Michael P. Pignone MD: None
Carmen L Lewis MD MPH: None
Similar articles
- Clinical and Economic Impact of Tailoring Screening to Predicted Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Decision Analytic Modeling Study.
Ladabaum U, Mannalithara A, Mitani A, Desai M. Ladabaum U, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Feb;29(2):318-328. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0949. Epub 2019 Dec 3. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020. PMID: 31796524 - Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.
Inadomi JM. Inadomi JM. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Dec;23 Suppl 2:S198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05556.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008. PMID: 19120898 - Inflationary caution in GI endoscopy.
Sonnenberg A. Sonnenberg A. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):789-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.044. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20363420 No abstract available. - Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines.
Fisher JA, Fikry C, Troxel AB. Fisher JA, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jan;15(1):108-13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0198. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006. PMID: 16434595 Review. - Screening colonoscopy in balance. Issues of implementation.
Ransohoff DF. Ransohoff DF. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;31(4):1031-44, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8553(02)00059-6. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002. PMID: 12489276 Review.
Cited by
- Anxiety Associated with Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy: A Systematic Review.
Yang C, Sriranjan V, Abou-Setta AM, Poluha W, Walker JR, Singh H. Yang C, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1810-1818. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0398-8. Epub 2018 Nov 1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30385831 Free PMC article. - Alerts in electronic medical records to promote a colorectal cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.
Guiriguet C, Muñoz-Ortiz L, Burón A, Rivero I, Grau J, Vela-Vallespín C, Vilarrubí M, Torres M, Hernández C, Méndez-Boo L, Toràn P, Caballeria L, Macià F, Castells A. Guiriguet C, et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jul;66(648):e483-90. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685657. Epub 2016 Jun 6. Br J Gen Pract. 2016. PMID: 27266861 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans in Human Colorectal Cancer.
Vicente CM, da Silva DA, Sartorio PV, Silva TD, Saad SS, Nader HB, Forones NM, Toma L. Vicente CM, et al. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2018 Jun 20;2018:8389595. doi: 10.1155/2018/8389595. eCollection 2018. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2018. PMID: 30027065 Free PMC article. Review. - Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.
Sequist TD, Franz C, Ayanian JZ. Sequist TD, et al. Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6):553-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbd8eb. Med Care. 2010. PMID: 20473196 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.
Elwyn G, Scholl I, Tietbohl C, Mann M, Edwards AG, Clay C, Légaré F, van der Weijden T, Lewis CL, Wexler RM, Frosch DL. Elwyn G, et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S14. Epub 2013 Nov 29. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013. PMID: 24625083 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–41. - PubMed
- Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, Mandelblatt J. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):96–104. - PubMed
- Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(1):52–61. - PubMed
- MMWR. Use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(10):253–8. - PubMed
- Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(10):761–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous