Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3? - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2009 Jul 20;27(21):3459-64.

doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4669. Epub 2009 May 11.

Sven Perner, Meir J Stampfer, Jennifer A Sinnott, Stephen Finn, Anna S Eisenstein, Jing Ma, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Tobias Kurth, Massimo Loda, Edward L Giovannucci, Mark A Rubin, Lorelei A Mucci

Affiliations

Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?

Jennifer R Stark et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009.

Abstract

PURPOSE Gleason grading is an important predictor of prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. Studies using surrogate PCa end points suggest outcomes for Gleason score (GS) 7 cancers vary according to the predominance of pattern 4. These studies have influenced clinical practice, but it is unclear if rates of PCa mortality differ for 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors. Using PCa mortality as the primary end point, we compared outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 cancers, and the predictive ability of GS from a standardized review versus original scoring. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three study pathologists conducted a blinded standardized review of 693 prostatectomy and 119 biopsy specimens to assign primary and secondary Gleason patterns. Tumor specimens were from PCa patients diagnosed between 1984 and 2004 from the Physicians' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. Lethal PCa (n = 53) was defined as development of bony metastases or PCa death. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated according to original GS and standardized GS. We compared the discrimination of standardized and original grading with C-statistics from models of 10-year survival. Results For prostatectomy specimens, 4 + 3 cancers were associated with a three-fold increase in lethal PCa compared with 3 + 4 cancers (95% CI, 1.1 to 8.6). The discrimination of models of standardized scores from prostatectomy (C-statistic, 0.86) and biopsy (C-statistic, 0.85) were improved compared to models of original scores (prostatectomy C-statistic, 0.82; biopsy C-statistic, 0.72). CONCLUSION Ignoring the predominance of Gleason pattern 4 in GS 7 cancers may conceal important prognostic information. A standardized review of GS can improve prediction of PCa survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Comparison of standardized and original Gleason scores assigned to prostatectomy specimens during three time periods. The Gleason scores and the best fitting line through the points are plotted in gold. The blue line represents perfect concordance between original and standardized scores.

Fig 2.

Fig 2.

Discrimination of models including Gleason data from original source versus standardized review of prostatectomy specimens. C-statistics from models of 10-year survival with Gleason score categorized as a 10-level ordinal variable for Gleason scores 2 to 10 (with separate codes for Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3). Standardized Gleason score C-statistic, 0.86; original Gleason score C-statistic, 0.82.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gleason DF. Histologic grading of prostate cancer: A perspective. Hum Pathol. 1992;23:273–279. - PubMed
    1. Andren O, Fall K, Franzen L, et al. How well does the Gleason score predict prostate cancer death? A 20-year followup of a population based cohort in Sweden. J Urol. 2006;175:1337–1340. - PubMed
    1. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol. 1974;111:58–64. - PubMed
    1. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969–974. - PubMed
    1. Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Barrows GH, et al. Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1248–1253. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources