Science and the CQT polygraph. A theoretical critique - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

. 1991 Jul-Sep;26(3):223-31.

doi: 10.1007/BF02912514.

Affiliations

• PMID: 1954162
• DOI: 10.1007/BF02912514

Review

Science and the CQT polygraph. A theoretical critique

L Saxe. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1991 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Despite substantial contrary scientific evidence, polygraph tests to detect deception continue to be employed in the United States. It is argued that polygraph tests (in particular, the Control Question Technique) lack construct validity. Polygraph tests do not assess deceptiveness, but rather are situations designed to elicit and assess fear. Correct decisions may be obtained when subjects fear detection; however, because there is no way to determine the cause of a subject's fear or anxiety, validation is impossible. The paper also considers other physiological detection paradigms and concludes that because of the nature of honesty their use to detect deception is unlikely.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• A comparison of field and laboratory polygraphs in the detection of deception.
  Patrick CJ, Iacono WG. Patrick CJ, et al. Psychophysiology. 1991 Nov;28(6):632-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb01006.x. Psychophysiology. 1991. PMID: 1816590
• Cognitive and emotional aspects of polygraph diagnostic procedures: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
  Elaad E. Elaad E. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Jan;95(1):14-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 2. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25093905
• Good intentions that fail to cope with the main point in CQT: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
  Ginton A. Ginton A. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Jan;95(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 28. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25264350
• Credibility assessment: preliminary process theory, the polygraph process, and construct validity.
  Palmatier JJ, Rovner L. Palmatier JJ, et al. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Jan;95(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 13. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015. PMID: 24933412 Review.

Cited by

• Thermal signatures of voluntary deception in ecological conditions.
  Panasiti MS, Cardone D, Pavone EF, Mancini A, Merla A, Aglioti SM. Panasiti MS, et al. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 13;6:35174. doi: 10.1038/srep35174. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27734927 Free PMC article.
• Face and voice as social stimuli enhance differential physiological responding in a concealed information test.
  Ambach W, Assmann B, Krieg B, Vaitl D. Ambach W, et al. Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 19;3:510. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00510. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 23293613 Free PMC article.
• Building a second-opinion tool for classical polygraph.
  Asonov D, Krylov M, Omelyusik V, Ryabikina A, Litvinov E, Mitrofanov M, Mikhailov M, Efimov A. Asonov D, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(1):5522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31775-6. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37069221 Free PMC article.

References

1. 1. Psychol Bull. 1979 Jan;86(1):47-53 - PubMed
2. 1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 May;48(5):1191-203 - PubMed
3. 1. Psychol Bull. 1979 Jan;86(1):54-9 - PubMed
4. 1. Am J Psychiatry. 1988 May;145(5):554-62 - PubMed
5. 1. Lancet. 1986 Mar 8;1(8480):544-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms