Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension - PubMed (original) (raw)
Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension
Rutvik H Desai et al. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Feb.
Abstract
The sensory-motor account of conceptual processing suggests that modality-specific attributes play a central role in the organization of object and action knowledge in the brain. An opposing view emphasizes the abstract, amodal, and symbolic character of concepts, which are thought to be represented outside the brain's sensory-motor systems. We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in which the participants listened to sentences describing hand/arm action events, visual events, or abstract behaviors. In comparison to visual and abstract sentences, areas associated with planning and control of hand movements, motion perception, and vision were activated when understanding sentences describing actions. Sensory-motor areas were activated to a greater extent also for sentences with actions that relied mostly on hands, as opposed to arms. Visual sentences activated a small area in the secondary visual cortex, whereas abstract sentences activated superior temporal and inferior frontal regions. The results support the view that linguistic understanding of actions partly involves imagery or simulation of actions, and relies on some of the same neural substrate used for planning, performing, and perceiving actions.
Figures
Figure 1.
Activations for (a) M–V, (b) M–A, and (c) V–A contrasts. Panel (d) shows areas correlated with RT. Orange/yellow denotes positive values, whereas blue/cyan denotes negative values. Activations are projected on an inflated surface of a brain. Gyri are shown in light gray and sulci in dark gray. M = motor, V = visual, A = abstract.
Figure 2.
Composite maps of the contrasts and the activation from localizer scans. (a) M > V (b) M > A (c) V > A. Green represents the M condition in panels (a) and (b), and represents V in panel (c). Activation by the motor localizer is in red, and that by the visual localizer is in blue. White represents the overlap of all 3 conditions. M = motor, V = visual, A = Abstract. ML = motor localizer, VL = visual localizer.
Figure 3.
Areas correlated with hand ratings of motor verbs and their overlap with the motor localizer. White lines show stereotaxic axes.
References
- Allport DA. Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In: S Newman, R Epstein., editors. Current perspectives in dysphasia. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1985. pp. 207–244.
- Baayen RH, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L. University of Pennsylvania: Linguistic Data Consortium; 1995. The CELEX Lexical Database [CD ROM]
- Bak T, Hodges JR. Kissing and Dancing”—A test to distinguish the lexical and conceptual contributions to noun/verb and action/object dissociation: preliminary results in patients with frontotemporal dementia. J Neurolinguistics. 2003;16:169–181.
- Bak TH, Hodges JR. The effects of motor neurone disease on language: further evidence. Brain Lang. 2004;89:354–361. -PubMed
- Bak TH, Yancopoulou D, Nestor PJ, Xuereb JH, Spillantini MG, Pulvermuller F, Hodges JR. Clinical, imaging and pathological correlates of a hereditary deficit in verb and action processing. Brain. 2006;129:321–332. -PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources