Women walking for health and fitness. How much is enough? - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Dec 18;266(23):3295-9.
Affiliations
- PMID: 1960829
Clinical Trial
Women walking for health and fitness. How much is enough?
J J Duncan et al. JAMA. 1991.
Abstract
Objective: We studied whether the quantity and quality of walking necessary to decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease among women differed substantially from that required to improve cardiorespiratory fitness.
Design: A randomized, controlled, dose-response clinical trial with a follow-up of 24 weeks.
Setting: A private, nonprofit biomedical research facility.
Participants: One hundred two sedentary premenopausal women, 20 to 40 years of age, were randomized to one of four treatment groups; 59 completed the study (16 aerobic walkers [8.0-km/h group], 12 brisk walkers [6.4-km/h group], 18 strollers [4.8-km/h group], and 13 sedentary controls). Eighty-one percent were white, 17% black, and 2% Hispanic.
Intervention: Intervention groups walked 4.8 km per day, 5 days per week at 8.0 km/h, 6.4 km/h, or 4.8 km/h on a tartan-surfaced, 1.6-km track for 24 weeks.
Main outcome measures: Fitness (determined by maximal oxygen uptake) and cardiovascular risk factors (determined by resting blood pressure and serum lipid and lipoprotein levels).
Results: As compared with controls, maximal oxygen uptake increased significantly (P less than .0001) and in a dose-response manner (aerobic walkers greater than brisk walkers greater than strollers). In contrast, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were not dose related and increased significantly (P less than .05) and to the same extent among women who experienced considerable improvements in their physical fitness (8.0-km/h group, +0.08 mmol/L) and those who had only minimal improvements in fitness (4.8-km/h group, +0.08 mmol/L). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol also increased among the 6.4-km/h group, but did not attain statistical significance (+0.06 mmol/L; P = .06). Dietary patterns revealed no significant differences among groups.
Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that vigorous exercise is not necessary for women to obtain meaningful improvements in their lipoprotein profile. Walking at intensities that do not have a major impact on cardiorespiratory fitness may nonetheless produce equally favorable changes in the cardiovascular risk profile.
Similar articles
- Brisk walking, fitness, and cardiovascular risk: a randomized controlled trial in primary care.
Tully MA, Cupples ME, Chan WS, McGlade K, Young IS. Tully MA, et al. Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.11.030. Prev Med. 2005. PMID: 15917061 Clinical Trial. - The effects of 60 minutes of brisk walking per week, accumulated in two different patterns, on cardiovascular risk.
Murtagh EM, Boreham CA, Nevill A, Hare LG, Murphy MH. Murtagh EM, et al. Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.10.008. Epub 2004 Nov 21. Prev Med. 2005. PMID: 15916998 Clinical Trial. - Prescribing exercise at varied levels of intensity and frequency: a randomized trial.
Duncan GE, Anton SD, Sydeman SJ, Newton RL Jr, Corsica JA, Durning PE, Ketterson TU, Martin AD, Limacher MC, Perri MG. Duncan GE, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Nov 14;165(20):2362-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.20.2362. Arch Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 16287765 Clinical Trial. - Walking to health.
Morris JN, Hardman AE. Morris JN, et al. Sports Med. 1997 May;23(5):306-32. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199723050-00004. Sports Med. 1997. PMID: 9181668 Review. - Walking: the undervalued prescription.
Franklin BA. Franklin BA. Prev Cardiol. 2006 Winter;9(1):56-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1520-037x.2006.4995.x. Prev Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16407704 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
- Mental health rescue effects of women's outdoor tourism: A role in COVID-19 recovery.
Buckley R, Westaway D. Buckley R, et al. Ann Tour Res. 2020 Nov;85:103041. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.103041. Epub 2020 Oct 20. Ann Tour Res. 2020. PMID: 33100433 Free PMC article. - Characteristics of physical activity guidelines and their effect on adherence: a review of randomized trials.
Rhodes RE, Warburton DE, Murray H. Rhodes RE, et al. Sports Med. 2009;39(5):355-75. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939050-00003. Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19402741 - Lifestyle activity. Current recommendations.
Phillips WT, Pruitt LA, King AC. Phillips WT, et al. Sports Med. 1996 Jul;22(1):1-7. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199622010-00001. Sports Med. 1996. PMID: 8819236 - The epidemiology of walking for exercise: implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups.
Siegel PZ, Brackbill RM, Heath GW. Siegel PZ, et al. Am J Public Health. 1995 May;85(5):706-10. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.5.706. Am J Public Health. 1995. PMID: 7733433 Free PMC article. - Walking and Non-HDL-C in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV. Kelley GA, et al. Prev Cardiol. 2005 Spring;8(2):102-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1520-037x.2005.3474.x. Prev Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 15860986 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials