Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index - PubMed (original) (raw)
Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index
Michael Vianin. J Chiropr Med. 2008 Dec.
Abstract
Objective: Outcome measures with good reliability, validity, responsiveness, and low burden of administration are clinically useful. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most commonly used outcome measures for individuals with low back pain. Psychometric properties of the ODI will determine the questionnaire's suitability as a useful clinical tool.
Methods: A literature search of relevant databases on psychometric evaluation of the ODI was performed. The search was done using the key words disability evaluation, and low back pain, and questionnaires, and reproducibility of results, and the term Oswestry. Inclusion criterion was direct reference regarding psychometric property, interpretability, and burden being included in the abstract.
Results: Eight articles met the inclusion criterion. The ODI shows good construct validity; internal consistency is rated as acceptable; test-retest reliability and responsiveness have been shown to be high; and burden of administration is low.
Conclusions: The ODI is a valid, reliable, and responsive condition-specific assessment tool that is suited for use in clinical practice. It is easy to administer and score, objectifies clients' complaints, and monitors effects of therapy.
Similar articles
- A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency.
Sheahan PJ, Nelson-Wong EJ, Fischer SL. Sheahan PJ, et al. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(25):2367-74. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647. Epub 2015 Mar 4. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25738913 Review. - Psychometric Properties Study of the Oswestry Disability Index in a Spanish Population With Previous Lumbar Disc Surgery: Homogeneity and Validity.
Selva-Sevilla C, Ferrara P, Gerónimo-Pardo M. Selva-Sevilla C, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):E430-E437. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002867. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 30234803 - Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain.
Payares K, Lugo LH, Morales V, Londoño A. Payares K, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):E1730-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. PMID: 22138784 - Development of a French-Canadian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.
Denis I, Fortin L. Denis I, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 1;37(7):E439-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318233eaf9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22037523 - Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales.
Garg A, Pathak H, Churyukanov MV, Uppin RB, Slobodin TM. Garg A, et al. Eur Spine J. 2020 Mar;29(3):503-518. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06279-5. Epub 2020 Jan 8. Eur Spine J. 2020. PMID: 31916001 Review.
Cited by
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined With Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Jurak I, Grabar S, Žura N, Jakuš L. Jurak I, et al. Physiother Res Int. 2025 Jan;30(1):e70009. doi: 10.1002/pri.70009. Physiother Res Int. 2025. PMID: 39572389 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Utility of the PICOTS framework to assess clinical trial disruptions: monitoring the impact of COVID-19 in the Pain Management Collaboratory.
Peduzzi P, Brandt C, Dearth CL, Dziura J, Farrokhi S, George SZ, Kyriakides TC, Long CR, Mascha EJ, Patterson CG, Rhon DI, Kerns RD. Peduzzi P, et al. Pain Med. 2024 Nov 1;25(Supplement_1):S34-S40. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae078. Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39514876 - A Study on the Job Characteristics of Police Officers and the Status of Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Kim W, Park S, Woo BK, Kim Y, Yoon C, Lee D, Kim J, Park YC. Kim W, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 4;12(19):1983. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191983. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39408164 Free PMC article. - Treatment of Andersson lesion-complicating ankylosing spondylitis via early minimally invasive surgery.
Zhang C, Li Y, Wang G, Sun J. Zhang C, et al. Bone Jt Open. 2024 Oct 15;5(10):886-893. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0023.R1. Bone Jt Open. 2024. PMID: 39401793 Free PMC article. - Rehabilitation of Pregnancy and Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis and Vertebral Fractures: A Case Report.
Sahni P, Edeer AO, Lindsay R. Sahni P, et al. HSS J. 2024 May;20(2):298-305. doi: 10.1177/15563316231167148. Epub 2023 May 18. HSS J. 2024. PMID: 39281988 No abstract available.
References
- Davidson M., Keating J.L. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002;82(1):8–24. - PubMed
- Fairbank J.C., Pynsent P.B. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–2952. [discussion 52] - PubMed
- Roland M., Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25(24):3115–3124. - PubMed
- Walsh T.L., Hanscom B., Lurie J.D., Weinstein J.N. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine. 2003;28(6):607–615. - PubMed
- Finch E., Brooks D., Stratford P., Mayo N. 2nd ed. 2002. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous