Navigating the ribosome's metastable energy landscape - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Navigating the ribosome's metastable energy landscape
James B Munro et al. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009 Aug.
Abstract
The molecular mechanisms by which tRNA molecules enter and transit the ribosome during mRNA translation remains elusive. However, recent genetic, biochemical and structural studies offer important new findings into the ordered sequence of events underpinning the translocation process that help place the molecular mechanism within reach. In particular, new structural and kinetic insights have been obtained regarding tRNA movements through 'hybrid state' configurations. These dynamic views reveal that the macromolecular ribosome particle, like many smaller proteins, has an intrinsic capacity to reversibly sample an ensemble of similarly stable native states. Such perspectives suggest that substrates, factors and environmental cues contribute to translation regulation by helping the dynamic system navigate through a highly complex and metastable energy landscape.
Figures
Figure I
Schematic structural representation of the four principal phases of translation. This highly simplified diagram shows initiation, elongation, termination and recycling steps, as well as the key translation factors facilitating these reactions, in a manner meant to illustrate the cyclical nature and estimated timescales of translation processes. The range of time scales shown depends strongly on mRNA codon sequence and the availability of substrates and factors, as well as temperature and ionic conditions. The translocation component of the elongation cycle is highlighted in red to indicate the focus on this multistep process in this review.
Figure I
Schematic of ligand-induced modulation of the free-energy landscape. (a) Graph indicating the hierarchical structure of the free energy landscape with the magnitude of activation barriers relative to k_B_T (_k_B is Boltzmann’s constant, T is temperature). Also shown is the remodeling of the landscape before (black) and after (red) ligand binding. (b) Hypothetical graph diagram indicating the existence of multiple pathways connecting states on the energy landscape and the re-weighting of preferred pathways before (black) and after (red) ligand binding.
Figure 1
Structural snapshots of functional ribosome complexes reveal distinct conformational degrees of freedom implicated in the translation mechanism. Distinct views of three-dimensional, atomic models of the bacterial ribosome (Protein Data Bank accession codes 2QAL, 2QAM, 1VS9 and 1Q86) are shown to schematically illustrate (with double-headed arrows) mobile structural elements within (a) the 70S particle, (b) the large (50S) ribosomal subunit and (c) the small (30S) ribosomal subunit. Ribosomal proteins are shown in blue and tan in the large and small subunit, respectively. In both subunits rRNA is shown in gray ribbons. Conserved rRNA elements directly contacting tRNA substrates are shown in green. (a) A cross-sectional view of the 70S pre-translocation ribosome reveals the substrate-binding channel formed at the subunit interface. The three tRNA binding sites (E, P and A) are illustrated, and classically configured A- and P-site tRNAs are shown in red. Landmark structural features, including the decoding site (DS), the peptidyl transferase center (PTC), the L1 stalk, the GTPase activating center (GAC), the A-site finger (ASF; H38 of 23S rRNA), the P-site gate (G1338–A1339, A790 of 16S rRNA) and the mRNA track are indicated for structural reference. (b) The isolated 50S subunit interface is shown to schematically illustrate the protein and rRNA components of the L1 stalk and the GAC and their estimated range of motions [26,55,57]. The ASF bridging the large and small subunit head domains, as well as the A- and P-loop structural elements within the PTC that base pair with the 3′-CCA-ends of tRNA, are highlighted in green. (c) The solvent surface of the 30S subunit is shown to illustrate the single-stranded mRNA (red) track, which wraps around the neck domain and contacts the Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence at the convergence of the three principal structural domains (head, platform and body). Panels (i–iii) show the identified conformational degrees of freedom in the ribosome that are implicated in the translocation mechanism and their approximate magnitudes. (i) Subunit ratcheting rotates the three 30S domains counterclockwise in a collective fashion; the reverse motion is termed unratcheting. (ii) Head rotation represents a swiveling motion of the 30S head domain around the neck-like feature connecting the principal domains [3]. (iii) Head tilt represents flexion of the neck perpendicular and parallel to the subunit interface [35]. (ii–iii) The head domain is highlighted to indicate that these motions can largely occur in the absence of subunit ratcheting.
Figure 2
The multistep process of translocation is one of motion, including conformational changes in the ribosome, tRNA and EF-G. A mechanistic model depicting the process of tRNA–mRNA translocation is schematically diagramed to include data from kinetic, structural and smFRET investigations. Dynamic processes and factor- and substrate-induced conformational changes are included where knowledge of such processes is either known or inferred from experimental data. (i) On the dynamic pre-translocation complex, A- and P-site tRNAs (red) spontaneously transition to the A/P and P/E hybrid states [17,41,42]. The 30S subunit exchanges between ratcheted and unratcheted states [53,58,59], and the L1 stalk transitions between open (opaque), intermediate (translucent) and closed (translucent) positions [56,57]. (Step 1) EF-G binds rapidly and reversibly to the dynamic pre-translocation complex (ii). (Step 2) EF-G binding is quickly followed by GTP hydrolysis (iii) [44,45,80]. (Step 3) GTP hydrolysis promotes subunit ratcheting (RSR), P/E-hybrid-state formation and L1 stalk closure (iv), quickly followed by (Step 4) formation of the A/P hybrid state (v). (Step 5) Rate-limiting conformational changes within the ribosome and EF-G, triggered by the direct interaction of EF-G’s tRNA like domains with the 30S decoding site, precipitate movements of both A- and P-site tRNA–mRNA complexes with respect to the 30S subunit and Pi release (perhaps in random order), followed by unratcheting (vi). (Step 6) EF-G(GDP) releases from the post-translocation ribosome complex. In the post-translocation complex the L1 stalk adopts a distinct, partially closed configuration (vii). Rate constants, where indicated, were compiled from previously published models taken under a variety of experimental conditions and must be interpreted with the understanding that global translocation rates are highly sensitive to both temperature and buffer components as well as ribosome pre-translocation complex composition [8,44,45,50,57]; rates that have not been experimentally determined are noted with a ‘?’. Stochastic processes (tRNA and L1 stalk motions, subunit ratcheting/ unratcheting) are presumed to remain dynamic throughout the process, where prior to translocation only the relative populations of potential sub-states change.
Figure 3
Atomic and cartoon models of classical and hybrid tRNA configurations. (a) Cartoon depicting the transitions of A- and P-site tRNAs (red) between the classical state (A/A–P/P), hybrid state 1 (A/P–P/E) and hybrid state 2 (A/A–P/E) observed by smFRET [41]. The Cy3 and Cy5 fluorophores used in smFRET investigations of tRNA motions attached to naturally occurring modified nucleotides (s4U8 on P-site tRNAfMet and acp3U47 on A-site peptidyl-tRNAPhe) are represented as green and red circles, respectively. Also shown are the approximate occupancies of the three configurations, the transition rates and the estimated distance changes observed. (b) Atomic models of the classical (A/A and P/P) and hybrid (A/P and P/E) tRNA configurations observed by cryo-EM [59] embedded in an atomic model of the 70S ribosome. As in (a), the approximate positions of the Cy3 (green) and Cy5 (red) fluorophores used in smFRET investigations are shown near the elbow regions of the A- and P-site tRNAs [41]. The distances shown are the estimated inter-dye displacements between classical and hybrid states [59]. Panel (b) was reproduced, with permission, from Ref. [59].
Similar articles
- Insights into the molecular determinants of EF-G catalyzed translocation.
Wang L, Altman RB, Blanchard SC. Wang L, et al. RNA. 2011 Dec;17(12):2189-200. doi: 10.1261/rna.029033.111. Epub 2011 Oct 27. RNA. 2011. PMID: 22033333 Free PMC article. - Meanderings of the mRNA through the ribosome.
Culver GM. Culver GM. Structure. 2001 Sep;9(9):751-8. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00649-9. Structure. 2001. PMID: 11566123 Review. - tRNA-mRNA mimicry drives translation initiation from a viral IRES.
Costantino DA, Pfingsten JS, Rambo RP, Kieft JS. Costantino DA, et al. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008 Jan;15(1):57-64. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1351. Epub 2007 Dec 23. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008. PMID: 18157151 Free PMC article. - Direct measurement of the mechanical work during translocation by the ribosome.
Liu T, Kaplan A, Alexander L, Yan S, Wen JD, Lancaster L, Wickersham CE, Fredrick K, Noller H, Tinoco I, Bustamante CJ. Liu T, et al. Elife. 2014 Aug 11;3:e03406. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03406. Elife. 2014. PMID: 25114092 Free PMC article. - Intermediate states during mRNA-tRNA translocation.
Frank J. Frank J. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012 Dec;22(6):778-85. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 17. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012. PMID: 22906732 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Synthesis of Peptidyl-tRNA Mimics for Structural Biology Applications.
Polikanov YS, Etheve-Quelquejeu M, Micura R. Polikanov YS, et al. Acc Chem Res. 2023 Oct 3;56(19):2713-2725. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00412. Epub 2023 Sep 20. Acc Chem Res. 2023. PMID: 37728742 Free PMC article. Review. - Practical Synthesis of _N_-Formylmethionylated Peptidyl-tRNA Mimics.
Thaler J, Syroegin EA, Breuker K, Polikanov YS, Micura R. Thaler J, et al. ACS Chem Biol. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):2233-2239. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.3c00237. Epub 2023 Jul 11. ACS Chem Biol. 2023. PMID: 37433044 Free PMC article. - Beyond ManifoldEM: geometric relationships between manifold embeddings of a continuum of 3D molecular structures and their 2D projections.
Seitz E, Frank J, Schwander P. Seitz E, et al. Digit Discov. 2023 Apr 6;2(3):702-717. doi: 10.1039/d2dd00128d. eCollection 2023 Jun 12. Digit Discov. 2023. PMID: 37312683 Free PMC article. - Quality control ensures fidelity in ribosome assembly and cellular health.
Parker MD, Karbstein K. Parker MD, et al. J Cell Biol. 2023 Apr 3;222(4):e202209115. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202209115. Epub 2023 Feb 15. J Cell Biol. 2023. PMID: 36790396 Free PMC article. Review. - Visualizing translation dynamics at atomic detail inside a bacterial cell.
Xue L, Lenz S, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Tegunov D, Cramer P, Bork P, Rappsilber J, Mahamid J. Xue L, et al. Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7930):205-211. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05255-2. Epub 2022 Sep 28. Nature. 2022. PMID: 36171285 Free PMC article.
References
- Ramakrishnan V. What we have learned from ribosome structures. Biochem Soc Trans. 2008;36:567–574. - PubMed
- Berk V, Cate JH. Insights into protein biosynthesis from structures of bacterial ribosomes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007;17:302–309. - PubMed
- Wilson DN, Nierhaus KH. The weird and wonderful world of bacterial ribosome regulation. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;42:187– 219. - PubMed
- Herbert TP, Proud CG. Regulation of translational elongation and the cotranslational protein targeting pathway. In: Mathews MB, et al., editors. Translational Control in Biology and Medicine. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2007. pp. 601–624.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 GM072686/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 GM079238/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 GM079238-03/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- GM 079238/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources