A note on the definition of "dual use" - PubMed (original) (raw)
A note on the definition of "dual use"
John Forge. Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Mar.
Abstract
While there has been much interest in this topic, no generally accepted definition of dual use has been forthcoming. As a contribution to this issue, it is maintained that three related kinds of things comprise the category of dual use: research, technologies and artefacts. In regard to all three kinds, difficulties are identified in making clear distinctions between those that are and are not dual use. It is suggested that our classification should take account of actual capacities and willingness to make use of these objects for 'bad ends' and not the mere possibility that this could be done, and here three 'contextual factors' are identified. A (provisional) definition is proposed that takes account of threats and risks.
Similar articles
- Managing dual use technology: it takes two to tango.
Kant L, Mourya DT. Kant L, et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Mar;16(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9062-9. Epub 2008 Apr 26. Sci Eng Ethics. 2010. PMID: 18438721 - Philosophical aspects of dual use technologies.
Pustovit SV, Williams ED. Pustovit SV, et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Mar;16(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9086-1. Epub 2008 Oct 21. Sci Eng Ethics. 2010. PMID: 18937057 - Knowledge mobilization in the context of health technology assessment: an exploratory case study.
Fournier MF. Fournier MF. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Apr 3;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-10. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012. PMID: 22472141 Free PMC article. Review. - [Governing innovations in health care].
Grilli R. Grilli R. Recenti Prog Med. 2006 Nov;97(11):589-93. Recenti Prog Med. 2006. PMID: 17252714 Review. Italian.
Cited by
- Dual-Use and Trustworthy? A Mixed Methods Analysis of AI Diffusion Between Civilian and Defense R&D.
Schmid S, Riebe T, Reuter C. Schmid S, et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Mar 8;28(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00364-7. Sci Eng Ethics. 2022. PMID: 35258776 Free PMC article. - Disruptive Technologies and Open Science: How Open Should Open Science Be? A 'Third Bioethics' Ethical Framework.
Spitale G, Germani F, Biller-Andorno N. Spitale G, et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Aug 9;30(4):36. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00502-3. Sci Eng Ethics. 2024. PMID: 39120628 Free PMC article. - AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans.
Spitale G, Biller-Andorno N, Germani F. Spitale G, et al. Sci Adv. 2023 Jun 28;9(26):eadh1850. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh1850. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Sci Adv. 2023. PMID: 37379395 Free PMC article. - From cases to capacity? A critical reflection on the role of 'ethical dilemmas' in the development of dual-use governance.
Edwards B, Revill J, Bezuidenhout L. Edwards B, et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):571-82. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9450-7. Epub 2013 May 24. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014. PMID: 23703451 Free PMC article. - Evolution of different dual-use concepts in international and national law and its implications on research ethics and governance.
Rath J, Ischi M, Perkins D. Rath J, et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Sep;20(3):769-90. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9519-y. Epub 2014 Feb 5. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014. PMID: 24497004 Review.
References
- Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):523-80 - PubMed
- Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Mar;16(1):17-31 - PubMed
- Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Mar;15(1):3-5 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials