Gemcitabine plus enzastaurin or single-agent gemcitabine in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a phase II, randomized, noncomparative study - PubMed (original) (raw)

Clinical Trial

doi: 10.1007/s10637-009-9307-8. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

Paul R Kuefler, Carlos Becerra, Lalan S Wilfong, Robert H Gersh, Kristi A Boehm, Feng Zhan, Lina Asmar, Scott P Myrand, Rebecca R Hozak, Luping Zhao, John F Gill, Brian P Mullaney, Coleman K Obasaju, Steven J Nicol

Affiliations

Clinical Trial

Gemcitabine plus enzastaurin or single-agent gemcitabine in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a phase II, randomized, noncomparative study

Donald A Richards et al. Invest New Drugs. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Gemcitabine (G) is standard therapy for pancreatic cancer. Enzastaurin (E) inhibits PKCβ and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways with a dose-dependent effect on growth of pancreatic carcinoma xenografts. Data suggest that the GE combination may improve clinical outcomes.

Methods: Primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives assessed progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and relationships between biomarker expression and clinical outcomes. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to GE or G treatment; GE arm: E 500 mg p.o. daily; loading-dose (1200 mg; Day 1 Cycle 1 only) and G 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. Days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles; G arm: G as in GE. Biomarker expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

Results: Randomization totaled 130 patients (GE = 86, G = 44); 121 patients were treated (GE = 82, G = 39). GE/G median OS was 5.6/5.1 months; median PFS was 3.4/3.0 months. GE responses: 1 complete response (CR, 1.2%), 6 partial response (PR, 7.4%), and 33 stable disease (SD, 40.7%); disease control rate (DCR=CR+PR+SD, 49.4%). G responses: 2 PR (5.3%) and 16 SD (42.1%); DCR (47.4%). No QOL differences were noted between arms. GE/G Grade 3-4 toxicities included: neutropenia (18.3%/28.2%); thrombocytopenia (14.6%/25.6%); and fatigue (11.0%/7.7%). No statistically significant relationships between biomarker expression and outcomes were observed. However, patients with low expression of cytoplasmic pGSK-3β trended toward greater OS with GE treatment.

Conclusions: OS, PFS, QOL, and RR were comparable between arms. Adding E to G did not increase hematologic toxicities. GE does not warrant further investigation in unselected pancreatic cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cancer Res. 2005 Mar 15;65(6):2076-81 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Aug 1;20(15):3270-5 - PubMed
    1. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Nov 15;13(22 Pt 1):6827-33 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;65(16):7462-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24(24):3946-52 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources