Validation and reliability of the German version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in primary care back pain patients - PubMed (original) (raw)
Validation and reliability of the German version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in primary care back pain patients
Bernhard W Klasen et al. Psychosoc Med. 2004.
Abstract
In 1992 Von Korff and his co-workers developed a simple, brief questionnaire to assess the severity of chronic pain problems, the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG). The present study was conducted to analyse the psychometric properties of the translated German version of the CPG within a population of primary care back pain patients (n=130). Factor analysis yielded two factors which accounted for 72% of the variance of the questionnaire. The first factor 'Disability Score' (53.56% of the variance) revealed a good internal consistency (alpha=.88), the internal consistency of the second factor 'Characteristic Pain Intensity' was moderate (alpha=.68). The reliability of the whole instrument was good (alpha=.82). The CPG and its subscales show moderate to high relations with other instruments assessing the patient's disability (FFbH-R, Pain Disability Index PDI). Additionally weak to moderate but significant correlations were found between the CPG and other measures of grading and staging chronic pain (MPSS, RGS). Further, positive correlations between the CPG and both, the frequency of doctor visits and the frequent use of pain medication have been seen. The reported findings suggest, that the German version of the CPG is a reliable, valid and useful instrument if a brief, simple method of grading the severity of chronic pain is needed. The German version leads to a better comparability between German and English language studies and facilitates an international collaboration in this field of research.
Von Korff et al. entwickelten 1992 einen einfachen, kurzen Fragebogen zur Erfassung des Schweregrades von chronischen Schmerzerkrankungen, den „Chronic Pain Grade" (CPG). Die hier vorgestellte Studie wurde durchgeführt, um die psychometrischen Eigenschaften der deutschen Übersetzung des CPG an einer Stichprobe chronischer Rückenschmerzpatienten aus der primärärztlichen Versorgung (n=130) zu überprüfen. Eine Faktorenanalyse führte zu zwei Faktoren, die insgesamt 72% der Varianz aufklären. Der erste Faktor „Disability Score" (53.56% Varianzaufklärung) weist eine gute innere Konsistenz auf (Cronbach's alpha = .88), die Reliabilität des zweiten Faktors „Characteristic Pain Intensity" ist zufriedenstellend (Cronbach's alpha = .68). Die innere Konsistenz für das gesamte Verfahren ist gut (Cronbach's alpha = .82). Der CPG und seine Subskalen weisen mittlere bis hohe Korrelationen mit weiteren Instrumenten zur Erfassung von körperlicher bzw. psychosozialer Beeinträchtigung auf (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover-Rücken FFbH-R, PDI). Des Weiteren konnten schwache bis mäßige, aber statistisch signifikante Korrelationen mit anderen Staging- bzw. Grading-Instrumenten (MPSS, RGS) gefunden werden. Schließlich zeigten sich mit zunehmendem Schweregrad im CPG eine Zunahme der Anzahl von Arztbesuchen sowie eine vermehrte Einnahme von Schmerzmedikamenten. Die deutsche Version des CPG erwies sich damit als ein reliables und valides Instrument zur Erhebung des Schweregrades chronischer Schmerzen, welches einfach in der Handhabung ist und die Vergleichbarkeit zwischen englisch- und deutschsprachigen Forschungsarbeiten erleichtert.
Keywords: chronicity; disability; grading; low back pain; validation.
Figures
Similar articles
- Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.
Salaffi F, Stancati A, Grassi W. Salaffi F, et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Sep;25(5):619-31. doi: 10.1007/s10067-005-0140-y. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Clin Rheumatol. 2006. PMID: 16421646 - Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of the German Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI).
von Piekartz H, La Touche R, Paris-Alemany A, Löwen A, Ismail M, Köhl R, Benz K, Ballenberger N. von Piekartz H, et al. Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):E857-E866. Pain Physician. 2021. PMID: 34554706 - Validation of the Persian version of the fear avoidance belief questionnaire in patients with low back pain.
Rostami M, Noorian N, Mansournia MA, Sharafi E, Babaki AE, Kordi R. Rostami M, et al. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(2):213-21. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130439. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24254494 - Validation and investigation of cross cultural equivalence of the Fremantle back awareness questionnaire - German version (FreBAQ-G).
Schäfer A, Wand BM, Lüdtke K, Ehrenbrusthoff K, Schöttker-Königer T. Schäfer A, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04156-1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 33794840 Free PMC article. - Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into German: evaluation of content and process.
John MT, Hirsch C, Reiber T, Dworkin Sf. John MT, et al. J Orofac Pain. 2006 Winter;20(1):43-52. J Orofac Pain. 2006. PMID: 16483020 Review.
Cited by
- [Validity of the Chronic Pain Grade Scale in nonspecific chronic low back pain].
Hampel P, Hüwel AM. Hampel P, et al. Schmerz. 2024 Nov 7. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00844-8. Online ahead of print. Schmerz. 2024. PMID: 39508877 German. - Comparison of Measurements for Recording Postural Control in Standing and Seated Position in Healthy Individuals.
Floessel P, Hammerschmidt F, Koltermann JJ, Foerster J, Beck H, Disch AC, Datzmann T. Floessel P, et al. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Sep 27;9(4):178. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040178. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024. PMID: 39449472 Free PMC article. - [Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: does the dose make a difference? : A comparison from routine clinical care].
Baumbach P, Storch P, Weiss T, Meissner W, Rottstädt F. Baumbach P, et al. Schmerz. 2024 Oct 9. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00838-6. Online ahead of print. Schmerz. 2024. PMID: 39382691 German. - Avoidance and Endurance Responses to Pain Before and with Advanced Chronification: Preliminary Results from a Questionnaire Survey in Adult Patients with Non-Cancer Pain Conditions.
Teichmüller K, Kübler A, Rittner HL, Kindl GK. Teichmüller K, et al. J Pain Res. 2024 Jul 25;17:2473-2481. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464509. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 39081329 Free PMC article. - Medical App Treatment of Non-Specific Low Back Pain in the 12-month Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial Rise-uP: Where Clinical Superiority Meets Cost Savings.
Priebe JA, Kerkemeyer L, Haas KK, Achtert K, Moreno Sanchez LF, Stockert P, Spannagl M, Wendlinger J, Thoma R, Jedamzik SU, Reichmann J, Franke S, Sundmacher L, Amelung VE, Toelle TR. Priebe JA, et al. J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 26;17:2239-2255. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S473250. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 38952994 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
- Fordyce WE. Back pain in the workplace: management of disability in non-specific conditions. A report of the Task Force on Pain in the Workplace of the IASP. Seattle: IASP Press; 1995. - PubMed
- Berger-Schmitt R, Kohlmann T, Raspe HH. Rückenschmerzen in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Gesundheitswesen. 1996;58:519–524. - PubMed
- Sullivan MD, Turner JA, Romano J. Chronic pain in primary care: identification and management of psychosocial factors. J Fam Pract. 1991;32(2):193–199. - PubMed
- Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992;50:133–149. - PubMed
- Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, Munro C, Wilson B, Grimshaw J, Chambers WA, Smith WC. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain. 1997;71:141–147. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources