Ontologies for Neuroscience: What are they and What are they Good for? - PubMed (original) (raw)

Ontologies for Neuroscience: What are they and What are they Good for?

Stephen D Larson et al. Front Neurosci. 2009.

Abstract

Current information technology practices in neuroscience make it difficult to understand the organization of the brain across spatial scales. Subcellular junctional connectivity, cytoarchitectural local connectivity, and long-range topographical connectivity are just a few of the relevant data domains that must be synthesized in order to make sense of the brain. However, due to the heterogeneity of the data produced within these domains, the landscape of multiscale neuroscience data is fragmented. A standard framework for neuroscience data is needed to bridge existing digital data resources and to help in the conceptual unification of the multiple disciplines of neuroscience. Using our efforts in building ontologies for neuroscience as an example, we examine the benefits and limits of ontologies as a solution for this data integration problem. We provide several examples of their application to problems of image annotation, content-based retrieval of structural data, and integration of data across scales and researchers.

Keywords: data integration; databases; neuroanatomy; neuroinformatics; subcellular anatomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• The NIFSTD and BIRNLex vocabularies: building comprehensive ontologies for neuroscience.
  Bug WJ, Ascoli GA, Grethe JS, Gupta A, Fennema-Notestine C, Laird AR, Larson SD, Rubin D, Shepherd GM, Turner JA, Martone ME. Bug WJ, et al. Neuroinformatics. 2008 Sep;6(3):175-94. doi: 10.1007/s12021-008-9032-z. Epub 2008 Oct 31. Neuroinformatics. 2008. PMID: 18975148 Free PMC article.
• AlzPharm: integration of neurodegeneration data using RDF.
  Lam HY, Marenco L, Clark T, Gao Y, Kinoshita J, Shepherd G, Miller P, Wu E, Wong GT, Liu N, Crasto C, Morse T, Stephens S, Cheung KH. Lam HY, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 May 9;8 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S3-S4. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007. PMID: 17493287 Free PMC article.
• Development and use of Ontologies Inside the Neuroscience Information Framework: A Practical Approach.
  Imam FT, Larson SD, Bandrowski A, Grethe JS, Gupta A, Martone ME. Imam FT, et al. Front Genet. 2012 Jun 22;3:111. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00111. eCollection 2012. Front Genet. 2012. PMID: 22737162 Free PMC article.
• Interoperability across neuroscience databases.
  Marenco L, Nadkarni P, Martone M, Gupta A. Marenco L, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;401:23-36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-520-6_2. Methods Mol Biol. 2007. PMID: 18368358 Review.
• A Standards Organization for Open and FAIR Neuroscience: the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility.
  Abrams MB, Bjaalie JG, Das S, Egan GF, Ghosh SS, Goscinski WJ, Grethe JS, Kotaleski JH, Ho ETW, Kennedy DN, Lanyon LJ, Leergaard TB, Mayberg HS, Milanesi L, Mouček R, Poline JB, Roy PK, Strother SC, Tang TB, Tiesinga P, Wachtler T, Wójcik DK, Martone ME. Abrams MB, et al. Neuroinformatics. 2022 Jan;20(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s12021-020-09509-0. Epub 2021 Jan 27. Neuroinformatics. 2022. PMID: 33506383 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

• A virtual library for behavioral performance in standard conditions-rodent spontaneous activity in an open field during repeated testing and after treatment with drugs or brain lesions.
  Szechtman H, Dvorkin-Gheva A, Gomez-Marin A. Szechtman H, et al. Gigascience. 2022 Oct 20;11:giac092. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giac092. Gigascience. 2022. PMID: 36261217 Free PMC article.
• Anatomy and the type concept in biology show that ontologies must be adapted to the diagnostic needs of research.
  Vogt L, Mikó I, Bartolomaeus T. Vogt L, et al. J Biomed Semantics. 2022 Jun 27;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13326-022-00268-2. J Biomed Semantics. 2022. PMID: 35761389 Free PMC article.
• Molecular ontology of the parabrachial nucleus.
  Karthik S, Huang D, Delgado Y, Laing JJ, Peltekian L, Iverson GN, Grady F, Miller RL, McCann CM, Fritzsch B, Iskusnykh IY, Chizhikov VV, Geerling JC. Karthik S, et al. J Comp Neurol. 2022 Jul;530(10):1658-1699. doi: 10.1002/cne.25307. Epub 2022 Feb 21. J Comp Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35134251 Free PMC article.
• Levels and building blocks-toward a domain granularity framework for the life sciences.
  Vogt L. Vogt L. J Biomed Semantics. 2019 Jan 28;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13326-019-0196-2. J Biomed Semantics. 2019. PMID: 30691505 Free PMC article.
• An ontology-based search engine for digital reconstructions of neuronal morphology.
  Polavaram S, Ascoli GA. Polavaram S, et al. Brain Inform. 2017 Jun;4(2):123-134. doi: 10.1007/s40708-017-0062-x. Epub 2017 Mar 23. Brain Inform. 2017. PMID: 28337675 Free PMC article.

References

1. 1. Ascoli G., Donohue D., Halavi M. (2007). NeuroMorpho.Org – a central resource for neuronal morphologies. J. Neurosci. 27, 9247–925110.1523/JNEUROSCI.2055-07.2007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
2. 1. Bota M., Swanson L. W. (2008). BAMS neuroanatomical ontology: design and implementation. Front. Neuroinformatics 2, 2, Epub 22 May 2008. - PMC - PubMed
3. 1. Bowden D. M., Dubach M., Park J. (2007). Creating neuroscience ontologies. Methods Mol. Biol. 401, 67–87 - PubMed
4. 1. Bug W. J., Ascoli G. A., Grethe J. S., Gupta A., Fennema-Notestine C., Laird A. R., Larson S. D., Rubin D., Shepherd G. M., Turner J. A., Martone M. E. (2008). The NIFSTD and BIRNLex vocabularies: building comprehensive ontologies for neuroscience. Neuroinformatics 6, 175–19410.1007/s12021-008-9032-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
5. 1. Evren S., Parsia B., Grau B. C., Kalyanpur A., Katz Y. (2005). Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner. UMIACS Technical Report, 2005–2068

Grants and funding

• R01 NS058296/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
• P41 LM007885/LM/NLM NIH HHS/United States
• HHSN271200577531C/DA/NIDA NIH HHS/United States
• P41 RR004050/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
• R01 DA016602/DA/NIDA NIH HHS/United States

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Europe PubMed Central
  • Frontiers Media SA
  • PubMed Central