Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate - PubMed (original) (raw)
Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate
John P Spencer et al. Child Dev Perspect. 2009.
Abstract
The nativist-empiricist debate and the nativist commitment to the idea of core knowledge and endowments that exist without relevant postnatal experience continue to distract attention from the reality of developmental systems. The developmental systems approach embraces the concept of epigenesis, that is, the view that development emerges via cascades of interactions across multiple levels of causation, from genes to environments. This view is rooted in a broader interpretation of experience and an appreciation for the nonobvious nature of development. We illustrate this systems approach with examples from studies of imprinting, spatial cognition, and language development, revealing the inadequacies of the nativist-empiricist debate and the inconvenient truths of development. Developmental scientists should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate and nativists' ungrounded focus on origins. Rather, the future lies in grounding our science in contemporary theory and developmental process.
References
- Abbs B, Gupta P, Tomblin JB, Lipinski J. A behavioral and computational integration of phonological, short-term memory and vocabulary acquisition processes in nonword repetition. In: MacNamara D, Trafton G, editors. Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society; Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society; 2007. pp. 59–64.
- Altmann G. Learning and development in neural networks—the importance of prior experience. Cognition. 2002;85:B43–B50. -PubMed
- Altmann G, Diennes Z. Rule learning by seven-month-old infants and neural networks. Science. 1999;284:875. -PubMed
- Bai DL, Bertenthal BI. Locomotor status and the development of spatial search skills. Child Development. 1992;63:215–226. -PubMed
- Bateson PPG. The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biological Review. 1966;41:177–220. -PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources