A functional imaging investigation of moral deliberation and moral intuition - PubMed (original) (raw)
A functional imaging investigation of moral deliberation and moral intuition
Carla L Harenski et al. Neuroimage. 2010.
Abstract
Prior functional imaging studies of moral processing have utilized 'explicit' moral tasks that involve moral deliberation (e.g., reading statements such as 'he shot the victim' and rating the moral appropriateness of the behavior) or 'implicit' moral tasks that involve moral intuition (e.g., reading similar statements and memorizing them for a test but not rating their moral appropriateness). Although the neural mechanisms underlying moral deliberation and moral intuition may differ, these have not been directly compared. Studies using explicit moral tasks have reported increased activity in several regions, most consistently the medial prefrontal cortex and temporo-parietal junction. In the few studies that have utilized implicit moral tasks, medial prefrontal activity has been less consistent, suggesting the medial prefrontal cortex is more critical for moral deliberation than moral intuition. Thus, we hypothesized that medial prefrontal activity would be increased during an explicit, but not an implicit, moral task. Participants (n=28) were scanned using fMRI while viewing 50 unpleasant pictures, half of which depicted moral violations. Half of the participants rated pictures on moral violation severity (explicit task) while the other half indicated whether pictures occurred indoors or outdoors (implicit task). As predicted, participants performing the explicit, but not the implicit, task showed increased ventromedial prefrontal activity while viewing moral pictures. Both groups showed increased temporo-parietal junction activity while viewing moral pictures. These results suggest that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex may contribute more to moral deliberation than moral intuition, whereas the temporo-parietal junction may contribute more to moral intuition than moral deliberation.
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Fig. 1
(A) Example moral, non-moral, and neutral pictures. (B) Example ‘moral trial’ for the explicit and implicit tasks.
Fig. 2
(A) Moral violation severity ratings by condition, indicating higher violation severity ratings in response to moral relative to non-moral and neutral pictures (Harenski et al., 2008). (B) Accuracy of indoor/outdoor ratings by condition, indicating higher accuracy for neutral relative to moral and non-moral pictures, but no significant difference for moral vs. non-moral pictures.
Fig. 3
Post-scan arousal ratings across conditions for explicit and implicit task participants. Both explicit and implicit task participants rated moral and non-moral pictures significantly higher on emotional arousal relative to neutral pictures. Participants who performed the explicit task rated moral pictures significantly higher on arousal relative to non-moral pictures, whereas no such effect was present in participants who performed the implicit task.
Fig. 4
(A) Increased ventromedial prefrontal activity during moral picture viewing in explicit vs. implicit task participants. (B) Increased dorsolateral prefrontal activity during moral picture viewing in implicit vs. explicit task participants. (C) Percent signal change values for ventromedial prefrontal activity across moral and non-moral condition in explicit and implicit task participants. (D) Percent signal change values for dorsolateral prefrontal activity across moral and non-moral condition in explicit and implicit task participants.
Fig. 5
(A) Positive correlation between ventromedial prefrontal activity (BA 10/11) and violation severity ratings of moral pictures in participants who performed the explicit task. (B) Positive correlation between medial prefrontal activity (BA 10) and post-scan emotional arousal ratings of moral pictures in participants who performed the implicit task.
Similar articles
- Gender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity.
Harenski CL, Antonenko O, Shane MS, Kiehl KA. Harenski CL, et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Dec;3(4):313-21. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn026. Epub 2008 Oct 19. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 19015084 Free PMC article. - Neural development of mentalizing in moral judgment from adolescence to adulthood.
Harenski CL, Harenski KA, Shane MS, Kiehl KA. Harenski CL, et al. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;2(1):162-73. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.09.002. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22267967 Free PMC article. - Neural basis of moral verdict and moral deliberation.
Schaich Borg J, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Calhoun VD, Kiehl KA. Schaich Borg J, et al. Soc Neurosci. 2011;6(4):398-413. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.559363. Epub 2011 Jun 12. Soc Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21590588 Free PMC article. - The role of the human prefrontal cortex in social cognition and moral judgment.
Forbes CE, Grafman J. Forbes CE, et al. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:299-324. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153230. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20350167 Review. - Moral intuition: its neural substrates and normative significance.
Woodward J, Allman J. Woodward J, et al. J Physiol Paris. 2007 Jul-Nov;101(4-6):179-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Jan 8. J Physiol Paris. 2007. PMID: 18280713 Review.
Cited by
- "Speak of the Devil… and he Shall Appear": Religiosity, Unconsciousness, and the Effects of Explicit Priming in the Misperception of Immorality.
Tsikandilakis M, Leong MQ, Yu Z, Paterakis G, Bali P, Derrfuss J, Mevel PA, Milbank A, Tong EMW, Madan C, Mitchell P. Tsikandilakis M, et al. Psychol Res. 2022 Feb;86(1):37-65. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01461-7. Epub 2021 Jan 23. Psychol Res. 2022. PMID: 33484351 - Neural Correlates of Moral Judgment in Criminal Offenders with Sadistic Traits.
Cazala F, Harenski KA, Thornton DM, Kiehl KA, Harenski CL. Cazala F, et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):2163-2171. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01818-4. Epub 2020 Nov 6. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 33156438 - How does mindfulness training improve moral cognition: a theoretical and experimental framework for the study of embodied ethics.
Sevinc G, Lazar SW. Sevinc G, et al. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:268-272. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 22. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30959379 Free PMC article. Review. - The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes.
Crone DL, Bode S, Murawski C, Laham SM. Crone DL, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0190954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190954. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29364985 Free PMC article. - Neural correlates of moral judgment in pedophilia.
Massau C, Kärgel C, Weiß S, Walter M, Ponseti J, Hc Krueger T, Walter H, Schiffer B. Massau C, et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Sep 1;12(9):1490-1499. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx077. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28992273 Free PMC article.
References
- Amodio DM, Frith CD. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2006;7:268–277. - PubMed
- Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science. 1997;275:1293–1295. - PubMed
- Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 2000;10:295–307. - PubMed
- Berthoz S, Grezes J, Armony JL, Passingham RE, Dolan RJ. Affective response to one’s own moral violations. Neuroimage. 2006;31:945–950. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials