The genome of a songbird - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr 1;464(7289):757-62.
doi: 10.1038/nature08819.
David F Clayton, Hans Ellegren, Arthur P Arnold, Ladeana W Hillier, Axel Künstner, Steve Searle, Simon White, Albert J Vilella, Susan Fairley, Andreas Heger, Lesheng Kong, Chris P Ponting, Erich D Jarvis, Claudio V Mello, Pat Minx, Peter Lovell, Tarciso A F Velho, Margaret Ferris, Christopher N Balakrishnan, Saurabh Sinha, Charles Blatti, Sarah E London, Yun Li, Ya-Chi Lin, Julia George, Jonathan Sweedler, Bruce Southey, Preethi Gunaratne, Michael Watson, Kiwoong Nam, Niclas Backström, Linnea Smeds, Benoit Nabholz, Yuichiro Itoh, Osceola Whitney, Andreas R Pfenning, Jason Howard, Martin Völker, Bejamin M Skinner, Darren K Griffin, Liang Ye, William M McLaren, Paul Flicek, Victor Quesada, Gloria Velasco, Carlos Lopez-Otin, Xose S Puente, Tsviya Olender, Doron Lancet, Arian F A Smit, Robert Hubley, Miriam K Konkel, Jerilyn A Walker, Mark A Batzer, Wanjun Gu, David D Pollock, Lin Chen, Ze Cheng, Evan E Eichler, Jessica Stapley, Jon Slate, Robert Ekblom, Tim Birkhead, Terry Burke, David Burt, Constance Scharff, Iris Adam, Hugues Richard, Marc Sultan, Alexey Soldatov, Hans Lehrach, Scott V Edwards, Shiaw-Pyng Yang, Xiaoching Li, Tina Graves, Lucinda Fulton, Joanne Nelson, Asif Chinwalla, Shunfeng Hou, Elaine R Mardis, Richard K Wilson
Affiliations
- PMID: 20360741
- PMCID: PMC3187626
- DOI: 10.1038/nature08819
Comparative Study
The genome of a songbird
Wesley C Warren et al. Nature. 2010.
Abstract
The zebra finch is an important model organism in several fields with unique relevance to human neuroscience. Like other songbirds, the zebra finch communicates through learned vocalizations, an ability otherwise documented only in humans and a few other animals and lacking in the chicken-the only bird with a sequenced genome until now. Here we present a structural, functional and comparative analysis of the genome sequence of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), which is a songbird belonging to the large avian order Passeriformes. We find that the overall structures of the genomes are similar in zebra finch and chicken, but they differ in many intrachromosomal rearrangements, lineage-specific gene family expansions, the number of long-terminal-repeat-based retrotransposons, and mechanisms of sex chromosome dosage compensation. We show that song behaviour engages gene regulatory networks in the zebra finch brain, altering the expression of long non-coding RNAs, microRNAs, transcription factors and their targets. We also show evidence for rapid molecular evolution in the songbird lineage of genes that are regulated during song experience. These results indicate an active involvement of the genome in neural processes underlying vocal communication and identify potential genetic substrates for the evolution and regulation of this behaviour.
Figures
Figure 1. Divergent patterns of dosage compensation in birds
a, b, The male to female (M/F) ratio of gene expression, measured by species-specific microarrays, is plotted along the Z chromosome of chicken (a) and zebra finch (b). Each point represents the average M/F ratio of a sliding window of 30 genes plotted at the median gene position and stepping one gene at a time along the chromosome. Note region of lower M/F ratios in chicken surrounding the locus of the MHM (male hypermethylated) ncRNA. In zebra finch, genes adjacent to the comparable MHM position (asterisk) show no special cluster of dosage compensation (low M/F ratios), and no MHM sequence appears in the genome assembly. bp, base pairs.
Figure 2. Enriched expression of a CR1-like element in the zebra finch song system
a, Genomic alignment of an RNA containing a CR1-like retrotransposon element (in blue) and adjacent ESTs, with respective GenBank accession numbers. b–d, DV949717 is expressed in the brain of adult males with enrichment in song nuclei HVC (letter-based name) and LMAN (lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium), as revealed by in situ hybridization. The diagram in b indicates areas shown in photomicrographs in c and d. Cb, cerebellum; Hp, hippocampus; Meso, mesopallium; Nido, nidopallium; Shelf, nidopallial shelf region; St, striatum. Scale bars, 0.1 mm.
Figure 3. miR-124 in the auditory forebrain is suppressed by exposure to new song
TaqMan assays comparing samples from the auditory lobule of adult male zebra finches in silence (open bars) or 30 min after onset of new song playback (filled bars). a, Comparison of two sample pools, each containing auditory forebrains of 20 birds. b, Comparisons of paired individual subjects, n = 6 pairs (P = 0.03, Wilcoxon paired test). Error bars denote s.e.m. of triplicate TaqMan assays. Parallel TaqMan analyses of the small RNA RNU6B were performed with all samples and showed no significant effect of treatment for this control RNA.
Figure 4. Conserved _NR4A3 3_′ UTR is a potential region for microRNA integration
a, zPicture alignment of 3′ portion of zebra finch to human gene showing UTR region of high similarity beyond the coding exons. Dark red bars, regions with the highest sequence conservation; black rectangles, position of song-regulated ESTs within the conserved UTR but outside the Ensembl gene model (ENSTGUG00000008853). b, Alignment of zebra finch and human 3′ UTR sequences showing the per cent sequence identity for each evolutionarily conserved region. Dots indicate positions of conserved new (‘n-’) or established (‘miR-’) microRNA-binding sites in both species within these regions.
Figure 5. Transcriptional control network in area X engaged by singing
a, Clustered (1–20) temporal expression profiles of 807 genes (rows) that change with time and amount of singing; red, increases; blue, decreases; white, no change relative to average 0-h control. Grey/coloured bars on left, clusters with enrichment of specific promoter motifs (P < 0.01). b, Enriched transcription-factor-binding motifs (abbreviations) found in the promoters of late response genes, clusters 9–12 (coloured as in a); bold, binding sites for known activity-dependent transcription factors (for example, CREBP1) or transcription factor complexes (for example, CREBP1–CJUN); black, sites for post-translationally activated transcription factors; brown, sites for transcriptionally activated transcription factors including by singing (for example, in cluster 1). Graph shows time course of average expression of all genes in the late response clusters, normalized to average 0 h for that cluster. Also plotted is the average expression of the C-FOS transcription factor mRNA, which binds to the AP-1 site over-represented in the promoters of cluster 10 genes.
Accessory Figure 1. Predicted motif genome location distribution
(A) Density of predicted motifs (y axis) for different categories of regions (x axis) in terms of location with respect to their nearest genes, shown in blue. The horizontal pink line is the genome-wide average. See text for definitions of motif density and various region categories. (B) P-values of enrichment or depletion of motif occurrence in each category of regions, using one-tailed Fishers exact tests. Negative logarithms are shown.
Accessory Figure 2. Motif target counts by defined location
Counts of targets windows of individual motifs in different categories of regions are compared to the respective expected values, with colors shown indicating whether the count is greater or less than expectation. Green cells correspond to counts that are higher than the average and red cells correspond to regions with below-average counts.
Accessory Figure 3
Comparative analysis of marker order on chicken chromosomes 2-8 and Z (GGA2-8, GGAZ) and their zebra finch orthologues (TGU2-8, TGUZ). The central part of each figure was created by aligning whole chromosomal sequences using the program GenAlyzer. Line colour indicates the length of sequences with 100% sequence identity. The tentative chromosomal rearrangements suggested by this analysis were verified using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Letters indicate the position of chicken and zebra finch BACs with orthologous sequence content in the genome sequences of both species (see accessory file Physical mapping table 2009-09-16.xls for details on the FISH probes used). Red dots on the ideograms illustrate the physical chromosomal position as determined by FISH.
Accessory Figure 3
Comparative analysis of marker order on chicken chromosomes 2-8 and Z (GGA2-8, GGAZ) and their zebra finch orthologues (TGU2-8, TGUZ). The central part of each figure was created by aligning whole chromosomal sequences using the program GenAlyzer. Line colour indicates the length of sequences with 100% sequence identity. The tentative chromosomal rearrangements suggested by this analysis were verified using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Letters indicate the position of chicken and zebra finch BACs with orthologous sequence content in the genome sequences of both species (see accessory file Physical mapping table 2009-09-16.xls for details on the FISH probes used). Red dots on the ideograms illustrate the physical chromosomal position as determined by FISH.
Accessory Figure 3
Comparative analysis of marker order on chicken chromosomes 2-8 and Z (GGA2-8, GGAZ) and their zebra finch orthologues (TGU2-8, TGUZ). The central part of each figure was created by aligning whole chromosomal sequences using the program GenAlyzer. Line colour indicates the length of sequences with 100% sequence identity. The tentative chromosomal rearrangements suggested by this analysis were verified using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Letters indicate the position of chicken and zebra finch BACs with orthologous sequence content in the genome sequences of both species (see accessory file Physical mapping table 2009-09-16.xls for details on the FISH probes used). Red dots on the ideograms illustrate the physical chromosomal position as determined by FISH.
Accessory Figure 3
Comparative analysis of marker order on chicken chromosomes 2-8 and Z (GGA2-8, GGAZ) and their zebra finch orthologues (TGU2-8, TGUZ). The central part of each figure was created by aligning whole chromosomal sequences using the program GenAlyzer. Line colour indicates the length of sequences with 100% sequence identity. The tentative chromosomal rearrangements suggested by this analysis were verified using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Letters indicate the position of chicken and zebra finch BACs with orthologous sequence content in the genome sequences of both species (see accessory file Physical mapping table 2009-09-16.xls for details on the FISH probes used). Red dots on the ideograms illustrate the physical chromosomal position as determined by FISH.
Accessory Figure 3
Comparative analysis of marker order on chicken chromosomes 2-8 and Z (GGA2-8, GGAZ) and their zebra finch orthologues (TGU2-8, TGUZ). The central part of each figure was created by aligning whole chromosomal sequences using the program GenAlyzer. Line colour indicates the length of sequences with 100% sequence identity. The tentative chromosomal rearrangements suggested by this analysis were verified using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Letters indicate the position of chicken and zebra finch BACs with orthologous sequence content in the genome sequences of both species (see accessory file Physical mapping table 2009-09-16.xls for details on the FISH probes used). Red dots on the ideograms illustrate the physical chromosomal position as determined by FISH.
Accessory Figure 4. Bayesian phylogenies of zebra finch MHC genes
(A) Class I genes and (B) Class IIB genes were compared to sequences from the chicken MHC-B complex. Putatively functional zebra finch genes with open reading frames are given numerical suffixes and putative pseudogenes are given lettered suffixes. For Class I we also include a chicken sequence from the MHC-Y region (YFV). For zebra finch class I, we show the placement of eight brain ESTs (indicated by their GenBank accession numbers) supporting the expression of MHC Class I genes in the brain. Posterior probabilities are given for well-supported nodes in the tree.
Accessory Figure 5
General view showing WGAC (>5kb) and WSSD on all chromosomes. Grey above lines is WSSD and red below lines is WGAC. ChrUn was treated as a “distinct” chromosome.
Accessory Figure 6
(A) Characteristics of co-expressed gene sets from Dong et al. 58 (See S3 supplementary notes). “Gene set”: name of the gene set, as in the original paper. “All genes” refers to the genes on the array in Dong et al. Numbers in parentheses indicate component subsets of a set. “Size”: number of genes in set. “terr_len”: average gene territory length of a gene set. “gene_len”: average coding sequence length. “intergenic_length”: average of (territory length – gene length). “p-value”: statistical significance of enrichment for short (pink cells) or long (green cells) territories, as measured by 2-tailed Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. (B) Average gene length and intergenic length of a gene set (y axis) versus average gene territory length. Each point corresponds to a gene set.
Similar articles
- A linkage map of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata provides new insights into avian genome evolution.
Stapley J, Birkhead TR, Burke T, Slate J. Stapley J, et al. Genetics. 2008 May;179(1):651-67. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.086264. Genetics. 2008. PMID: 18493078 Free PMC article. - Genome-wide annotation and analysis of zebra finch microRNA repertoire reveal sex-biased expression.
Luo GZ, Hafner M, Shi Z, Brown M, Feng GH, Tuschl T, Wang XJ, Li X. Luo GZ, et al. BMC Genomics. 2012 Dec 26;13:727. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-727. BMC Genomics. 2012. PMID: 23268654 Free PMC article. - The Genome of Blue-Capped Cordon-Bleu Uncovers Hidden Diversity of LTR Retrotransposons in Zebra Finch.
Boman J, Frankl-Vilches C, da Silva Dos Santos M, de Oliveira EHC, Gahr M, Suh A. Boman J, et al. Genes (Basel). 2019 Apr 13;10(4):301. doi: 10.3390/genes10040301. Genes (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31013951 Free PMC article. - The zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata: an avian model for investigating the neurobiological basis of vocal learning.
Mello CV. Mello CV. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2014 Oct 23;2014(12):1237-42. doi: 10.1101/pdb.emo084574. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2014. PMID: 25342070 Free PMC article. Review. - Gene manipulation to test links between genome, brain and behavior in developing songbirds: a test case.
London SE. London SE. J Exp Biol. 2020 Feb 7;223(Pt Suppl 1):jeb206516. doi: 10.1242/jeb.206516. J Exp Biol. 2020. PMID: 32034039 Review.
Cited by
- Characterization and distribution of de novo mutations in the zebra finch.
Liang X, Yang S, Wang D, Knief U. Liang X, et al. Commun Biol. 2024 Oct 2;7(1):1243. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06945-5. Commun Biol. 2024. PMID: 39358581 Free PMC article. - Trait Variation and Spatiotemporal Dynamics across Avian Secondary Contact Zones.
Wang S, Wu L, Zhu Q, Wu J, Tang S, Zhao Y, Cheng Y, Zhang D, Qiao G, Zhang R, Lei F. Wang S, et al. Biology (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;13(8):643. doi: 10.3390/biology13080643. Biology (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39194581 Free PMC article. Review. - The Genetic Architecture of Recombination Rates is Polygenic and Differs Between the Sexes in Wild House Sparrows (Passer domesticus).
McAuley JB, Servin B, Burnett HA, Brekke C, Peters L, Hagen IJ, Niskanen AK, Ringsby TH, Husby A, Jensen H, Johnston SE. McAuley JB, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2024 Sep 4;41(9):msae179. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae179. Mol Biol Evol. 2024. PMID: 39183719 Free PMC article. - Waves of Colonization and Gene Flow in a Great Speciator.
Gyllenhaal EF, Brady SS, DeCicco LH, Naikatini A, Hime PM, Manthey JD, Kelly J, Moyle RG, Andersen MJ. Gyllenhaal EF, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Jul 22:2024.07.18.603796. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.18.603796. bioRxiv. 2024. PMID: 39091784 Free PMC article. Preprint. - Museum genomics provide insight into the extinction of a specialist North American warbler species.
Byerly PA, Kearns AM, Welch A, Ochirbat ME, Marra PP, Wilson A, Campana MG, Fleischer RC. Byerly PA, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):17047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67595-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39048633 Free PMC article.
References
- Zann RA. The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies. Oxford Univ, Press; 1996.
- Nottebohm F. In: Hope For a New Neurology. Nottebohm F, editor. New York Academy of Science; 1985.
- Doupe AJ, Kuhl PK. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:567–631. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 NS051820/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 DC007218/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DA018310/DA/NIDA NIH HHS/United States
- MC_U137761446/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- HHMI/Howard Hughes Medical Institute/United States
- BB/E017509/1/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- R01NS051820/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HG002939/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 NS045264/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 GM59290/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- U54 HG003079/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 GM085233/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- BBE0175091/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- BB/E010652/1/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- BB/D013704/1/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- BB/F007590/1/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- BBS/E/I/00001425/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- R01 GM059290/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- BB/D013704/2/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources