The miRNA machinery targets Mei-P26 and regulates Myc protein levels in the Drosophila wing - PubMed (original) (raw)
The miRNA machinery targets Mei-P26 and regulates Myc protein levels in the Drosophila wing
Héctor Herranz et al. EMBO J. 2010.
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been implicated in cell-cycle regulation and in some cases shown to have a role in tissue growth control. Depletion of miRNAs was found to have an effect on tissue growth rates in the wing primordium of Drosophila, a highly proliferative epithelium. Dicer-1 (Dcr-1) is a double-stranded RNAseIII essential for miRNA biogenesis. Adult cells lacking dcr-1, or with reduced dcr-1 activity, were smaller than normal cells and gave rise to smaller wings. dcr-1 mutant cells showed evidence of being susceptible to competition by faster growing cells in vivo and the miRNA machinery was shown to promote G(1)-S transition. We present evidence that Dcr-1 acts by regulating the TRIM-NHL protein Mei-P26, which in turn regulates dMyc protein levels. Mei-P26 is a direct target of miRNAs, including the growth-promoting bantam miRNA. Thus, regulation of tissue growth by the miRNA pathway involves a double repression mechanism to control dMyc protein levels in a highly proliferative and growing epithelium.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Figure 1
Reduced cell growth in the absence of Dcr-1 activity. (A) Quantitative PCR experiment comparing the relative level of mature miRNAs between the anterior (a, white bars) and posterior (p, blue bars) compartments of en-gal4; UAS-dicer-1 RNAi UAS-GFP late third instar wing discs. The reference gene U27 was used for data normalization for RNAs from different compartments. The relative levels of miRNAs in the a compartment were set to ‘1' (white bars). en-gal4 drives expression of dicer RNAi and GFP in the p compartment. The _y_-axis shows the percentages of miRNA expression level relative to the a compartment. A wing disc is depicted to visualize a (white) and p (blue) compartments of a mature wing disc. (B) Cells in an en-gal; UAS-dcr-1 RNAi adult wing. The red line indicates the boundary between the anterior (a) dcr-1 _RNAi_-non-expressing and posterior (p) dcr-1 RNAi_-expressing cells. Note the reduced cell size of the posterior cells. (C, D) Cuticle preparations of adult wings expressing GFP, dcr-1 RNAi and/or dcr-1 in the patched (ptc, C) or engrailed (en, D) domains (labelled blue) in different genetic backgrounds. (E–G) Histograms plotting the size (E, F) and cell density values (G), normalized as a percent of the control GFP-expressing wing values, of the ptc and en domains expressing different transgenes. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. Only adult wing males were analysed. (E) In ptc>dcr-1 RNAi, a significant decrease in the size of the ptc domain was observed when compared with ptc>GFP wings (P<10−5). (**F**, **G**) In en>dcr-1 RNAi, a significant decrease in the size of the en domain was observed when compared with en>GFP wings (P<10−7), and a significant increase in the cell density of the _en_ domain was observed when compared with _en>GFP wings (P<10−3). Coexpression of _dcr-1_-rescued tissue (_P_<10−10) and cell size (_P_<10−2) defects. Tissue size values: _ptc>GFP_=100±8.4 (n of wings=10); _ptc>dcr-1-RNAi_=75±5.1 (_n_=12); _en>GFP_=100±5.7 (_n_=12); en> dcr-1 _RNAi_=75±5.1 (_n_=10); en> dcr-1 RNAi _>dcr-1_=110±5.8 (_n_=12). Cell density values: _en>GFP_=100±7.6 (_n_=10); en> dcr-1 _RNAi_=123±9.4 (_n_=10); en> dcr-1 RNAi _>dcr-1_=95±2.6 (_n_=10). (H, I) Adult wings with clones of cells lacking dcr-1 activity. The mutant tissue in adult wings (genotype: forked 36a hs-FLP; FRT 82 P(forked+) M(3)95A2/FRT82 dcr-1 Q1147X) was marked by absence of the P(forked +) rescue construct (see Materials and methods). In panel H, the red bar indicates the mutant bristles and blue arrows indicate the wild-type bristles. The red line in panel I indicates the boundary between wild-type and mutant tissue. Wild-type and M(3)95A2/+ adult wings show a similar cell size (Morata and Ripoll, 1975).
Figure 2
Dcr-1 and cell competition. (A, B) Wing discs with clones of cells lacking dcr-1 activity marked by absence of GFP (white). Clones were induced 72 h before dissection. Note the reduced size of the mutant clones (in black) when compared with the control wild-type twins (in white). (C) Graphs showing the relative sizes (clone areas, in arbitrary units) of individual pairs of _dcr-1_−/− clones (black bars) and dcr-1 +/+ twins (grey bars). Two different alleles of dcr-1 were used in panels A–C. Genotypes: hs-FLP; FRT 82 Ubi-GFP/FRT82 dcr-1 Q1147X and hs-FLP; FRT 82 Ubi-GFP/FRT82 dcr-1 d102. Only those wing discs with low frequency of clones and twins were scored to facilitate the quantification and reduce the possibility of fusion of neighbouring clones or twins. (D–F) Wing discs with clones of cells lacking dcr-1 activity marked by absence of GFP (white in panels D and E, green in panel F) and induced 72 h (D, F) or 96 h (E) before dissection. Note that mutant clones tend to break (red arrowheads in panel D) and enter apoptosis (labelled by TUNEL staining, red, F) 72 h after induction, and they are frequently lost from the epithelium 96 h after induction (E). (G) Wing discs with clones of cells lacking dcr-1 activity (right panels) or wild type for dcr-1 (left panels) and generated by the Minute technique to give clone cells a growth advantage. Clones were labelled by absence of GFP expression (white) and induced 96 h before dissection. The genotypes were: hs-FLP; FRT 82 Ubi-GFP M(3)95A2/FRT82 dcr-1 Q1147X and hs-FLP; FRT 82 Ubi-GFP M(3)95A2/FRT82. (H) Histogram plotting the size of dcr-1 (n clones=21) and wild-type Minute(+) clones (n clones=18) induced 96 h before dissection. Clone size was normalized as a percent of the wild-type Minute (+) clone size. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. The difference between both genotypes was statistically significant (P<10−8).
Figure 3
Dcr-1 regulates G1–S transition. (A–J) Wing discs with clones of cells lacking dcr-1 activity (A, D, E, G, I; genotype: hs-FLP; FRT 82 lacZ M(3)95A2/FRT82 dcr-1 Q1147X) marked by absence of β-gal (green), or expressing dcr-1 RNAi (B, C, F, H, J) in the patched (ptc) domain (red arrowheads) and labelled to visualize in pink or white cyclin-B (CycB; A, B), cyclin-E (CycE; C, D), dE2F activity (an E2F1 responsive reporter ORC1-GFP was used, antibody to GFP; E, F), PCNA (G, H) and Dacapo (Dap; I, J) protein expression. Clones were induced 72 h before dissection. (K) Cuticle preparations of adult wings expressing dcr-1 RNAi in the engrailed (en) domain in several genetic backgrounds. (L, M) Histograms plotting the size (L) and cell density (M) of the en domain in adult wings expressing dcr-1 RNAi in different genetic backgrounds. Tissue size and cell density values were normalized as a percent of the values of control GFP-expressing wings. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. Adult wing males and females were analysed. In en>dcr-1 RNAi, a significant decrease in the size of the en domain was observed when compared with en>GFP wings (P<10−7 in males and _P_<10−3 in females). Halving the dose of _dap_ or _Rbf_ or coexpression of _CycE_ significantly rescued this phenotype (_P_(_dap_ _4_)<10−5, _P_(_Rbf_ _sls5_)<10−5, _P_(CycE)<10−8). In en>dcr-1 RNAi males, a significant increase in the cell density of the en domain was observed when compared with en>GFP wings (P<10−3). Halving the dose of _dap_ or coexpression of _CycE_ significantly rescued the cell size defects (_P_(_dap_ _4_)<10−3, _P_(_CycE_) <10−3). Tissue size values (males): _en>GFP_=100±5.7 (_n_=12); en>dcr-1 _RNAi_=75±5.1 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi ; dap 4 _/+_=122±7.3 (_n_=7); en>dcr-1 RNAi _>CycE_=111±4.5 (_n_=12). Tissue size values (females): _en>GFP_=100±7.4 (_n_=12); en>dcr-1 _RNAi_=66±1.7 (_n_=12); Rbf sls5 /+; en>dcr-1 _RNAi_=80±3.1 (_n_=12). Cell density values (males): _en>GFP_=100±7.6 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 _RNAi_=123±9.4 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi ; dap 4 _/+_=105±4.5 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi _>CycE_=106±4.5 (_n_=10).
Figure 4
Dcr-1 regulates dMyc by repressing Mei-P26 protein levels. (A–F) Wild-type wing discs (E, F) or wing discs with reduced dcr-1 activity (A–D) labelled to visualize dMyc protein (red or white; A, B, D, E) or mRNA (purple; C, F) expression. In panel A, clones of cells were generated (genotype: hs-FLP; FRT 82 Ubi-GFP M(3)95A2/FRT82 dcr-1 Q1147X) and marked by absence of GFP (green). In panels B–D, dcr-1 RNAi was expressed in the patched (ptc, red arrowheads in panels B and C) or engrailed (en, red brackets in panel D) domains. The en domain was also labelled in panel D by expression of GFP. (G–I) Wing discs overexpressing mei-P26 (G, G′, H), dMyc and mei-P26 (I, J) or dMyc and GFP (K, L) in the engrailed (en; brackets in panels G, G′, H, I) domain and labelled to visualize dMyc protein (red or white; G, G′, I, K), Mei-P26 protein (green; I), GFP protein (green; K) or dMyc mRNA (purple; H, J, L). In panel G′, wing discs were cultured in the presence of MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, for3 h. (M–O) Wing discs with reduced dcr-1 activity labelled to visualize Mei-P26 protein (red or white) or mei-P26 mRNA (purple) expression. In panels M and M′, clones of dcr-1 mutant cells were generated (genotype: (M) hs-FLP; FRT 82 lacZ M(3)95A2/FRT82 dcr-1 Q1147X and (M′) hs-FLP; FRT 82 lacZ/FRT82 dcr-1 Q1147X) and marked by absence of β-gal (green). In panels N and O, dcr-1 RNAi was expressed in the patched (ptc; red arrowheads) domains. In panel O, sense and antisense RNA probes were used. (P, Q) Wing discs expressing dcr-1 RNAi and mei-P26 RNAi (ID number: 7553) in the patched (ptc, red arrowheads) domain and labelled to visualize dMyc (green or white) and Mei-P26 (red or white) protein expression in panel P, and dMyc mRNA (purple) expression in panel Q. (R, S) Wing discs with clones of AGO1 mutant cells marked by absence of GFP and labelled to visualize Mei-P26 (R) and dMyc (S) protein expression (red or white).Genotype: hs-FLP; FRT G13 Ubi-GFP/FRT13 AGO1 14 (R) and hs-FLP; FRT G13 Ubi-GFP M(2)l2/FRTG13 AGO1 14 (S).
Figure 5
dMyc contributes to the activity of Dcr-1 in regulating cell and tissue growth and E2F activity. (A) Histograms plotting the size and cell density values of the en domains expressing different transgene_s_. Tissue size and density values were normalized as a percent of the values of control GFP-expressing wings. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. Only adult wing males were analysed. In en>dcr-1 RNAi, a significant decrease in the size of the en domain was observed when compared with en>GFP wings (P<10−7). Coexpression of _dMyc_ or _mei-P26_ _RNAi_ significantly rescued this phenotype (_P_(dMyc)<10−9 and _P_(mei-P26RNAi)<10−4). Mild ubiquitous expression of _dMyc_ was also able to rescue this phenotype (_P_(hs-dMyc)<10−5 and _P_(tub-dMyc)<10−9). In en>dcr-1 RNAi, a significant increase in the cell density of the en domain was observed when compared with en>GFP wings (P<10−3). Coexpression of _dMyc_ or _mei-P26_ _RNAi_ significantly rescued the cell size defects (_P_(_dMyc_) <10−5 and _P_(_mei-P26_ _RNA_i)<10−4). Mild ubiquitous expression of _dMyc_ was also able to rescue this phenotype (_P_(_hs-dMyc_)<10−8 and _P_(_tub-dMyc_)<0,08). Tissue size values: _en>GFP_=100±5.7 (_n_=12); en> dcr-1 _RNAi_=75±5.1 (_n_=10); en> dcr-1 RNAi _>dMyc_=118±9.5 (_n_=12); en>dcr-1 RNAi _; hs-dMyc_=99±13.3 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi _; tub-dMyc_=108±5.8 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi ;mei-P26 _RNAi 106 754_=86±11.2 (_n_=10). Cell density values: _en>GFP_=100±7.6 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 _RNAi_=123±9.4 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi _>dMyc_=105±2.98 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi _; hs-dMyc_=89±3.5 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi _; tub-dMyc_=111±17 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi ;mei-P26 _RNAi 106 754_=105±3 (_n_=10). (B–D) Wing discs with clones of wild-type cells (B), mutant cells for dcr-1 (C) and mutant cells for dcr-1 and expressing dMyc (D) (genotypes: A: hs-FLP tub-Gal4 UAS-GFP; FRT82 arm-lacZ/FRT82 Gal80; B: hs-FLP tub-Gal4 UAS-GFP; FRT82 dcr Q1147X /FRT82 Gal80; C: hs-FLP tub-Gal4 UAS-GFP; UAS-dMyc/+; FRT82 dcr Q1147X /FRT82 Gal80). Clones were labelled by presence of GFP and induced 96 h before dissection. In panel B, twin clones were labelled by absence of β-gal expression (in red). Wing discs in panels C and D were labelled to visualize dMyc protein expression in red. (E) Frequency and size (in number of cells) of clones shown in panels B–D. To minimize the effects of fusion of clones, only those wild-type clones with one twin were quantified and wing discs with obvious fusions were discarded. (F–R) Wing discs labelled to visualize in red or white cyclin-B (CycB; F, K, O), PCNA (G, L, P), cyclin-E (CycE; H, M, Q) and Dacapo (Dap; I, J, N, R) protein expression, and in green GFP protein expression. In panels F–I, clones of cells mutant for dcr-1 and expressing GFP and dMyc were generated (genotype: hs-FLP tub-Gal4 UAS-GFP; UAS-dMyc/+; FRT82 dcr Q1147X /FRT82 Gal80). Clones were induced 72 h before dissection. In panels J–R, the following transgenes were expressed in the patched (ptc) domain: dcr-1 RNAi, dMyc and GFP (J), dcr-1 RNAi and GFP (K–N) and dcr-1 RNAi and mei-P26 RNAi (ID number: 106754, O-R). In panels K–N, dMyc was expressed at lower levels using the tub-dMyc construct.
Figure 6
The role of bantam in mediating the activity of Dcr-1 in regulating Dap and Mei-P26 protein levels. (A) Histograms plotting the size and cell density values of the en domains expressing GFP or dcr-1 RNAi. Tissue size and density values were normalized as a percent of the values of control GFP-expressing wings. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. Only adult wing males were analysed. In en>dcr-1 RNAi, a significant decrease in the size of the en domain and a significant increase in the cell density was observed when compared with en>GFP wings (P<10−7 and _P_<10−3, respectively). Mild ubiquitous expression of _bantam_ (with the _hs-bantam_ transgene) was able to rescue tissue size (_P_<10−9) and cell density (_P_<10−9). Tissue size values: _en>GFP_=100±5.7 (_n_=12); en>dcr-1 _RNAi_=75±5.1 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi _; hs-bantam_=119±6.3 (_n_=12). Cell density values: _en>GFP_=100±7.6 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 _RNAi_=123±9.4 (_n_=10); en>dcr-1 RNAi _; hs-bantam=_94±4.2 (_n_=10). (B–E) Wing discs labelled to visualize Mei-P26 (red or white; B, D, E) or dMyc (red or white; C), and GFP protein expression in ptc-Gal4; UAS-dcr-1 RNAi , UAS-bantam-GFP (B, C) and ptc-Gal4; UAS-bantam-GFP (D) larvae, and in clones of cells mutant for bantam (genotype: hs-FLP; M(3L) ubi-GFP FRT80B/ban Δ1 FRT80B) and marked by the absence of GFP (green) (E). The patched (ptc) domain is indicated by a red arrowhead. (F) Gal4-directed expression of UAS-bantam inhibited luciferase activity from a reporter containing the mei-P26 3′UTR (see Materials and methods), and in a much weaker manner the mutant 3′UTR in which the bantam 5′ seed region was deleted. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. The difference between intact and mutated UTR reporters was statistically significant (P<0.05). (G) Cartoon depicting the different Firefly-luciferase constructs containing wild-type or mutated mei-P26 3′UTR used in panel F. (H) Expression of mir-137 genomic fragments inhibited luciferase activity from a reporter containing the mei-P26 3′UTR (see Materials and methods), and in a much weaker manner the mutant 3′UTRs (mut1 and mut2) in which the mir-137 target sites were mutated. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. The difference between intact and mutated UTR reporters was statistically significant (P<0.05). (I) Cartoon depicting the different Firefly-luciferase constructs containing wild-type or mutated forms of the mei-P26 3′UTR used in panel H. The seed region is marked in red and the mutation are marked in blue and underlined.
Figure 7
The miRNA machinery regulates dMyc protein levels by targeting Mei-P26. An illustration describing the regulatory network described in this work by which the miRNA machinery maintains dMyc levels by targeting Mei-P26.
Similar articles
- Dicer-1 regulates proliferative potential of Drosophila larval neural stem cells through bantam miRNA based down-regulation of the G1/S inhibitor Dacapo.
Banerjee A, Roy JK. Banerjee A, et al. Dev Biol. 2017 Mar 1;423(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 18. Dev Biol. 2017. PMID: 28109717 - Mei-P26 mediates tissue-specific responses to the Brat tumor suppressor and the dMyc proto-oncogene in Drosophila.
Ferreira A, Boulan L, Perez L, Milán M. Ferreira A, et al. Genetics. 2014 Sep;198(1):249-58. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.167502. Epub 2014 Jul 1. Genetics. 2014. PMID: 24990993 Free PMC article. - A Wingless and Notch double-repression mechanism regulates G1-S transition in the Drosophila wing.
Herranz H, Pérez L, Martín FA, Milán M. Herranz H, et al. EMBO J. 2008 Jun 4;27(11):1633-45. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.84. Epub 2008 May 1. EMBO J. 2008. PMID: 18451803 Free PMC article. - MicroRNAs: Loquacious speaks out.
Leuschner PJ, Obernosterer G, Martinez J. Leuschner PJ, et al. Curr Biol. 2005 Aug 9;15(15):R603-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.044. Curr Biol. 2005. PMID: 16085484 Review. - MiRNA need a TRIM regulation of miRNA activity by Trim-NHL proteins.
Wulczyn FG, Cuevas E, Franzoni E, Rybak A. Wulczyn FG, et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;700:85-105. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010. PMID: 21627033 Review.
Cited by
- Wolbachia endosymbionts manipulate the self-renewal and differentiation of germline stem cells to reinforce fertility of their fruit fly host.
Russell SL, Castillo JR, Sullivan WT. Russell SL, et al. PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 24;21(10):e3002335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002335. eCollection 2023 Oct. PLoS Biol. 2023. PMID: 37874788 Free PMC article. - Myc-regulated miRNAs modulate p53 expression and impact animal survival under nutrient deprivation.
Gervé MP, Sánchez JA, Ingaramo MC, Dekanty A. Gervé MP, et al. PLoS Genet. 2023 Aug 28;19(8):e1010721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010721. eCollection 2023 Aug. PLoS Genet. 2023. PMID: 37639481 Free PMC article. - FOXO-mediated repression of Dicer1 regulates metabolism, stress resistance, and longevity in Drosophila.
Sánchez JA, Ingaramo MC, Gervé MP, Thomas MG, Boccaccio GL, Dekanty A. Sánchez JA, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 11;120(15):e2216539120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216539120. Epub 2023 Apr 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 37014862 Free PMC article. - The MicroRNA Ame-Bantam-3p Controls Larval Pupal Development by Targeting the Multiple Epidermal Growth Factor-like Domains 8 Gene (megf8) in the Honeybee, Apis mellifera.
Yu J, Song H, Wang H, Wang Y, Liu Z, Xu B. Yu J, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 17;24(6):5726. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065726. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36982800 Free PMC article. - Development and validation of a prognostic model for kidney renal clear cell carcinoma based on RNA binding protein expression.
Xiang Y, Zhou S, Hao J, Zhong C, Ma Q, Sun Z, Wei C. Xiang Y, et al. Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Nov 20;12(24):25356-25372. doi: 10.18632/aging.104137. Epub 2020 Nov 20. Aging (Albany NY). 2020. PMID: 33229623 Free PMC article.
References
- Brennecke J, Hipfner DR, Stark A, Russell RB, Cohen SM (2003) bantam encodes a developmentally regulated microRNA that controls cell proliferation and regulates the proapoptotic gene hid in Drosophila. Cell 113: 25–36 - PubMed
- de la Cova C, Abril M, Bellosta P, Gallant P, Johnston LA (2004) Drosophila myc regulates organ size by inducing cell competition. Cell 117: 107–116 - PubMed
- de Nooij JC, Letendre MA, Hariharan IK (1996) A cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, Dacapo, is necessary for timely exit from the cell cycle during Drosophila embryogenesis. Cell 87: 1237–1247 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials