Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Iveta Simera et al. BMC Med. 2010.
Abstract
Although current electronic methods of scientific publishing offer increased opportunities for publishing all research studies and describing them in sufficient detail, health research literature still suffers from many shortcomings. These shortcomings seriously undermine the value and utility of the literature and waste scarce resources invested in the research. In recent years there have been several positive steps aimed at improving this situation, such as a strengthening of journals' policies on research publication and the wide requirement to register clinical trials.The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network is an international initiative set up to advance high quality reporting of health research studies; it promotes good reporting practices including the wider implementation of reporting guidelines. EQUATOR provides free online resources http://www.equator-network.org supported by education and training activities and assists in the development of robust reporting guidelines. This paper outlines EQUATOR's goals and activities and offers suggestions for organizations and individuals involved in health research on how to strengthen research reporting.
Similar articles
- A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research.
Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. Simera I, et al. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Jan;40(1):35-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02234.x. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010. PMID: 20055895 Review. - Responsible reporting of health research studies: transparent, complete, accurate and timely.
Altman DG, Simera I. Altman DG, et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Jan;65(1):1-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp410. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010. PMID: 19900949 Free PMC article. - The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies.
Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. Simera I, et al. Maturitas. 2009 May 20;63(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 15. Maturitas. 2009. PMID: 19372017 Review. - Reporting medical research.
Simera I, Altman DG. Simera I, et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;67(8):710-6. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12168. Epub 2013 May 9. Int J Clin Pract. 2013. PMID: 23656235 - [Tools to enhance the quality and transparency of health research reports: reporting guidelines].
Galvão TF, Silva MT, Garcia LP. Galvão TF, et al. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016 Apr-Jun;25(2):427-436. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742016000200022. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016. PMID: 27869961 Portuguese.
Cited by
- Text classification models for assessing the completeness of randomized controlled trial publications based on CONSORT reporting guidelines.
Jiang L, Lan M, Menke JD, Vorland CJ, Kilicoglu H. Jiang L, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 17;14(1):21721. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72130-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39289403 Free PMC article. - How can meta-research be used to evaluate and improve the quality of research in the field of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine?
Ng JY, Lee MS, Liu JP, Steel A, Wieland LS, Witt CM, Moher D, Cramer H. Ng JY, et al. Integr Med Res. 2024 Sep;13(3):101068. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101068. Epub 2024 Jul 8. Integr Med Res. 2024. PMID: 39253695 Free PMC article. - Reporting checklists in neuroimaging: promoting transparency, replicability, and reproducibility.
Ekhtiari H, Zare-Bidoky M, Sangchooli A, Valyan A, Abi-Dargham A, Cannon DM, Carter CS, Garavan H, George TP, Ghobadi-Azbari P, Juchem C, Krystal JH, Nichols TE, Öngür D, Pernet CR, Poldrack RA, Thompson PM, Paulus MP. Ekhtiari H, et al. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Sep 6. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01973-5. Online ahead of print. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024. PMID: 39242922 Review. - Evaluating guideline and registration policies among neurology journals: a cross-sectional analysis.
Tran AV, Stadler JK, Ernst Z, Smith CA, Nees D, Hughes GK, Vassar M. Tran AV, et al. BMC Neurol. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03839-1. BMC Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39237894 Free PMC article. - Common Critiques and Recommendations for Studies in Neurology Using Machine Learning Methods.
Speiser JL, Kerr WT, Ziegler A. Speiser JL, et al. Neurology. 2024 Oct 8;103(7):e209861. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209861. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Neurology. 2024. PMID: 39236270
References
- Ware M, Mabe M. The STM report: an overview of scientific and scholarly journals publishing. 2009. http://www.stm-assoc.org/news.php?id=255&PHPSESSID=3c5575d0663c0e04a4600... (Accessed 30 March 2010)
- Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14 iii, ix-iii,193. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources