Meta-analysis: Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema - PubMed (original) (raw)
Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis: Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
Cui-Lian Weng et al. Ann Intern Med. 2010.
Erratum in
- Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 17;153(4):280
- Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 6;153(1):67
Abstract
Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is commonly used to treat patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE), but the findings of a recent large clinical trial suggest that NIV may be less effective for ACPE than previously thought.
Purpose: To provide an estimate of the effect of NIV on clinical outcomes in patients with ACPE that incorporates recent trial evidence and explore ways to interpret that evidence in the context of preceding evidence that favors NIV.
Data sources: PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to December 2009, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and conference proceedings through December 2009, and reference lists, without language restriction.
Study selection: Randomized trials that compared continuous positive airway pressure and bilevel ventilation with standard therapy or each other.
Data extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted data. Outcomes examined were mortality, intubation rate, and incidence of new myocardial infarction (MI).
Data synthesis: Compared with standard therapy, continuous positive airway pressure reduced mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.92]) and need for intubation (RR, 0.44 [CI, 0.32 to 0.60]) but not incidence of new MI (RR, 1.07 [CI, 0.84 to 1.37]). The effect was more prominent in trials in which myocardial ischemia or infarction caused ACPE in higher proportions of patients (RR, 0.92 [CI, 0.76 to 1.10] when 10% of patients had ischemia or MI vs. 0.43 [CI, 0.17 to 1.07] when 50% had ischemia or MI). Bilevel ventilation reduced the need for intubation (RR, 0.54 [CI, 0.33 to 0.86]) but did not reduce mortality or new MI. No differences were detected between continuous positive airway pressure and bilevel ventilation on any clinical outcomes for which they were directly compared.
Limitations: The quality of the evidence base was limited. Definitions, cause, and severity of ACPE differed among the trials, as did patient characteristics and clinical settings.
Conclusion: Although a recent large trial contradicts results from previous studies, the evidence in aggregate still supports the use of NIV for patients with ACPE. Continuous positive airway pressure reduces mortality more in patients with ACPE secondary to acute myocardial ischemia or infarction.
Primary funding source: None.
Comment in
- Errors in meta-analysis regarding the 3CPO trial.
Goodacre SW, Gray A, Newby D. Goodacre SW, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 17;153(4):277-8; author reply 278. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00024. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20713805 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- [Efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a meta-analysis].
Sun T, Wan Y, Kan Q, Yang F, Yao H, Guan F, Zhang J, Li L. Sun T, et al. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;42(2):161-8. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 24735630 Chinese. - Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
Berbenetz N, Wang Y, Brown J, Godfrey C, Ahmad M, Vital FM, Lambiase P, Banerjee A, Bakhai A, Chong M. Berbenetz N, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 5;4(4):CD005351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005351.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30950507 Free PMC article. - Noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.
Mehta S, Al-Hashim AH, Keenan SP. Mehta S, et al. Respir Care. 2009 Feb;54(2):186-95; discussion 195-7. Respir Care. 2009. PMID: 19173751 - Effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis.
Peter JV, Moran JL, Phillips-Hughes J, Graham P, Bersten AD. Peter JV, et al. Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1155-63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68506-1. Lancet. 2006. PMID: 16616558 Review. - Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.
Masip J. Masip J. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Oct;14(5):531-5. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32830c4862. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 18787445 Review.
Cited by
- The Association Between Early Administration of Noninvasive Ventilation and Short-Term Outcome for Acute Heart Failure.
Nakazawa T, Funakoshi H, Sakurai C, Iwata K, Yamazaki S, Homma Y, Inoue T. Nakazawa T, et al. Cureus. 2021 Oct 19;13(10):e18909. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18909. eCollection 2021 Oct. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34820224 Free PMC article. - Use of noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure, 2000-2009: a population-based study.
Walkey AJ, Wiener RS. Walkey AJ, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Feb;10(1):10-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201206-034OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013. PMID: 23509327 Free PMC article. - Diagnosing and managing acute heart failure in the emergency department.
Kuo DC, Peacock WF. Kuo DC, et al. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 30;2(3):141-149. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.007. eCollection 2015 Sep. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 27752588 Free PMC article. Review. - Acute dyspnea in the emergency department: a clinical review.
Santus P, Radovanovic D, Saad M, Zilianti C, Coppola S, Chiumello DA, Pecchiari M. Santus P, et al. Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;18(5):1491-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03322-8. Epub 2023 Jun 2. Intern Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37266791 Free PMC article. Review. - Non-invasive mechanical ventilation in hypoxemic respiratory failure: Just a matter of the interface?
Moerer O, Harnisch LO. Moerer O, et al. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):2348-2352. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.43. J Thorac Dis. 2016. PMID: 27746973 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources