North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress
No authors listed. Stroke. 1991 Jun.
Abstract
Fifty North American centers have combined to evaluate the benefit of carotid endarterectomy in randomized patients who have experienced symptoms related to arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery and who have received either best medical therapy alone or best medical therapy plus carotid endarterectomy. The outcome events are nonfatal and fatal stroke or death. A three-tier system identifies and adjudicates the type, severity, and location of each stroke and the cause of any death. Data about patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy outside the trial are compiled at the Nonrandomized Data Center at the Mayo Clinic. Between December 27, 1987, and October 1, 1990, 1,212 patients were randomized, 596 to medical therapy, 616 to carotid endarterectomy. Cross-over from the medical to the surgical arm has been low (4.2%). Patients eligible for the trial, but not randomized totaled 1,044; their characteristics were similar to those randomized so that, for the type of symptomatic patient in this study, our conclusions about the benefit of carotid endarterectomy can be generalized. Patients excluded by medical criteria totaled 679. Another 1,591 had carotid endarterectomy, but either lacked the disease under study, were asymptomatic, or received inadequate investigation to meet entry criteria. We set sample size at 1,900 patients, with continuing enrollment. The Monitoring Committee reviews at intervals the confidential analyses performed on the groups with moderate (30-69%) and severe (70-99%) stenosis. Stopping rules will be invoked for one or both groups if unequivocal benefit or harm is identified.
Similar articles
- Symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials.
Barnett HJ. Barnett HJ. Stroke. 1990 Nov;21(11 Suppl):III2-5. Stroke. 1990. PMID: 2237981 Clinical Trial. - Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators; Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Peerless SJ, Ferguson GG, Fox AJ, Rankin RN, Hachinski VC, Wiebers DO, Eliasziw M. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators, et al. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):445-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701. N Engl J Med. 1991. PMID: 1852179 Clinical Trial. - Effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: design of a clinical trial. Mayo Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Study Group.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Mayo Clin Proc. 1989 Aug;64(8):897-904. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61216-6. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989. PMID: 2677532 Clinical Trial. - Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association.
Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG, Bernstein EF, Brener BJ, Brott T, Caplan LR, Day A, Goldstone J, Hobson RW 2nd, et al. Moore WS, et al. Circulation. 1995 Jan 15;91(2):566-79. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.2.566. Circulation. 1995. PMID: 7805271 Review. - Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc Committee, American Heart Association.
Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG, Bernstein EF, Brener BJ, Brott T, Caplan LR, Day A, Goldstone J, Hobson RW 2nd, et al. Moore WS, et al. Stroke. 1995 Jan;26(1):188-201. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.1.188. Stroke. 1995. PMID: 7839390 Review.
Cited by
- Head and neck contrast-enhanced CT for identification of internal carotid artery stenosis progression on the affected side after treatment for oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Ikawa H, Sato K, Tonogi M, Yamane GY, Kimura M, Tatsuno S, Aoyagi Y, Katakura A. Ikawa H, et al. Oral Radiol. 2013 Jan;29(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s11282-012-0099-8. Epub 2012 Aug 11. Oral Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23293426 Free PMC article. - Lesion patterns of single small subcortical infarct and its association with early neurological deterioration.
Duan Z, Fu C, Chen B, Xu G, Tao L, Tang T, Hou H, Fu X, Yang M, Liu Z, Zhang X. Duan Z, et al. Neurol Sci. 2015 Oct;36(10):1851-7. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2267-1. Epub 2015 Jun 2. Neurol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26032577 - Evaluation of occurring complications after flow diverter treatment of elastase-induced aneurysm in rabbits using micro-CT and MRI at 9.4 T.
Simgen A, Ley D, Roth C, Cattaneo GF, Mühl-Benninghaus R, Müller A, Körner H, Kim YJ, Scheller B, Reith W, Yilmaz U. Simgen A, et al. Neuroradiology. 2016 Oct;58(10):987-996. doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1730-x. Epub 2016 Jul 25. Neuroradiology. 2016. PMID: 27457491 - When Can an Emergency CTA Be Dispensed with for TIA Patients?
Altenbernd JC, Gramada R, Kessler E, Skatulla J, Geppert E, Eyding J, Nordmeyer H. Altenbernd JC, et al. J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 26;11(19):5686. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195686. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36233554 Free PMC article. - Complementarity between (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Ultrasonography or Angiography in Carotid Plaque Characterization.
Noh SM, Choi WJ, Kang BT, Jeong SW, Lee DK, Schellingerhout D, Yeo JS, Kim DE. Noh SM, et al. J Clin Neurol. 2013 Jul;9(3):176-85. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2013.9.3.176. Epub 2013 Jul 1. J Clin Neurol. 2013. PMID: 23894241 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical