How advances in neural recording affect data analysis - PubMed (original) (raw)
How advances in neural recording affect data analysis
Ian H Stevenson et al. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Feb.
Abstract
Over the last five decades, progress in neural recording techniques has allowed the number of simultaneously recorded neurons to double approximately every 7 years, mimicking Moore's law. Such exponential growth motivates us to ask how data analysis techniques are affected by progressively larger numbers of recorded neurons. Traditionally, neurons are analyzed independently on the basis of their tuning to stimuli or movement. Although tuning curve approaches are unaffected by growing numbers of simultaneously recorded neurons, newly developed techniques that analyze interactions between neurons become more accurate and more complex as the number of recorded neurons increases. Emerging data analysis techniques should consider both the computational costs and the potential for more accurate models associated with this exponential growth of the number of recorded neurons.
Conflict of interest statement
COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Figures
Figure 1
Exponential growth in the number of recorded neurons. (a) Examining 56 studies published over the last five decades, we found that the number of simultaneously recorded neurons doubled approximately every 7 years. (b) A timeline of recording technologies during this period shows the development from single-electrode recordings to multi-electrode arrays and in vivo imaging techniques. Images of recording techniques reprinted from refs. – with permission of Elsevier, Springer Science + Business Media, and Am. Physiol. Soc. Image of Utah array reprinted from ref. , © 1999 IEEE. Ca2+ imaging reprinted from ref. 33, © 2003 Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
Figure 2
Approaches to neural data analysis and the scaling of spike prediction accuracy. (a) There are two main approaches to modeling multi-electrode data: mapping tuning properties to describe how neurons relate to stimuli or movement and mapping interactions between neurons. These techniques aim to predict spiking based on either external variables or other neural signals. (b) In data recorded from motor cortex (top) and visual cortex (bottom), spike prediction accuracy grows when modeling interactions between neurons, but is constant when modeling tuning curves. Shaded regions denote ± s.e.m. across neurons. (c) An alternative approach is to consider simultaneously recorded neural activity as an expression of a latent, low-dimensional state space. These spaces can be extracted by first estimating smooth firing rates for each neuron and then using a dimensionality reduction technique such as factor analysis. Features of these state spaces can then be used to predict reaction times or reach targets on a trial-by-trial basis or to describe neural variability. Purple and green ellipses represent neural variability at target onset and movement onset, respectively.
Similar articles
- Power demodulation of local field potential recordings.
Pearson S, McNames J. Pearson S, et al. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:1185-8. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260416. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006. PMID: 17946880 - A method for spike sorting and detection based on wavelet packets and Shannon's mutual information.
Hulata E, Segev R, Ben-Jacob E. Hulata E, et al. J Neurosci Methods. 2002 May 30;117(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00032-8. J Neurosci Methods. 2002. PMID: 12084559 - First-spike latency in the presence of spontaneous activity.
Pawlas Z, Klebanov LB, Benes V, Prokesová M, Popelár J, Lánský P. Pawlas Z, et al. Neural Comput. 2010 Jul;22(7):1675-97. doi: 10.1162/neco.2010.11-09-1118. Neural Comput. 2010. PMID: 20235823 - [Basic micro-electrophysiologic techniques used in neurobiology].
Konopacki J, Bland BH, Dyck R. Konopacki J, et al. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2000;54(3):261-78. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2000. PMID: 10941261 Review. Polish. - Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals.
Pereda E, Quiroga RQ, Bhattacharya J. Pereda E, et al. Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Sep-Oct;77(1-2):1-37. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 14. Prog Neurobiol. 2005. PMID: 16289760 Review.
Cited by
- Brain activity mapping at multiple scales with silicon microprobes containing 1,024 electrodes.
Shobe JL, Claar LD, Parhami S, Bakhurin KI, Masmanidis SC. Shobe JL, et al. J Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;114(3):2043-52. doi: 10.1152/jn.00464.2015. Epub 2015 Jul 1. J Neurophysiol. 2015. PMID: 26133801 Free PMC article. - Advances in cellular resolution microscopy for brain imaging in rats.
Kim SJ, Affan RO, Frostig H, Scott BB, Alexander AS. Kim SJ, et al. Neurophotonics. 2023 Oct;10(4):044304. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.10.4.044304. Epub 2023 Nov 30. Neurophotonics. 2023. PMID: 38076724 Free PMC article. Review. - Downstream network transformations dissociate neural activity from causal functional contributions.
Fakhar K, Dixit S, Hadaeghi F, Kording KP, Hilgetag CC. Fakhar K, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):2103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52423-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38267481 Free PMC article. - Successful reconstruction of a physiological circuit with known connectivity from spiking activity alone.
Gerhard F, Kispersky T, Gutierrez GJ, Marder E, Kramer M, Eden U. Gerhard F, et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(7):e1003138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003138. Epub 2013 Jul 11. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013. PMID: 23874181 Free PMC article. - Accurately estimating neuronal correlation requires a new spike-sorting paradigm.
Ventura V, Gerkin RC. Ventura V, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7230-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115236109. Epub 2012 Apr 23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 22529350 Free PMC article.
References
- Moore GE. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics. 1965;38
- Papadimitriou CH. Computational Complexity. John Wiley and Sons; 2003.
- Nicolelis M. Methods for Neural Ensemble Recordings. 2nd edn. CRC Press; 2007. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- EY016774/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 NS063399/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR025741/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- P01 NS044393/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 EY016774/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- 2P01NS044393/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- 1R01NS063399/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources