Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science - PubMed (original) (raw)

Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

Stephen J Ceci et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011.

Abstract

Explanations for women's underrepresentation in math-intensive fields of science often focus on sex discrimination in grant and manuscript reviewing, interviewing, and hiring. Claims that women scientists suffer discrimination in these arenas rest on a set of studies undergirding policies and programs aimed at remediation. More recent and robust empiricism, however, fails to support assertions of discrimination in these domains. To better understand women's underrepresentation in math-intensive fields and its causes, we reprise claims of discrimination and their evidentiary bases. Based on a review of the past 20 y of data, we suggest that some of these claims are no longer valid and, if uncritically accepted as current causes of women's lack of progress, can delay or prevent understanding of contemporary determinants of women's underrepresentation. We conclude that differential gendered outcomes in the real world result from differences in resources attributable to choices, whether free or constrained, and that such choices could be influenced and better informed through education if resources were so directed. Thus, the ongoing focus on sex discrimination in reviewing, interviewing, and hiring represents costly, misplaced effort: Society is engaged in the present in solving problems of the past, rather than in addressing meaningful limitations deterring women's participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers today. Addressing today's causes of underrepresentation requires focusing on education and policy changes that will make institutions responsive to differing biological realities of the sexes. Finally, we suggest potential avenues of intervention to increase gender fairness that accord with current, as opposed to historical, findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burrelli J. Thirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions. InfoBrief NSF 08-308. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics; 2008.
    1. Ceci SJ, Williams WM. The Mathematics of Sex: How Biology and Society Conspire to Limit Talented Women and Girls. New York: Oxford Univ Press; 2010.
    1. Ceci SJ, Williams WM. Sex differences in math-intensive fields. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19:275–279. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ceci SJ, Williams WM, Barnett SM. Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychol Bull. 2009;135:218–261. - PubMed
    1. Chesler NC, Barabino G, Bhatia SN, Richards-Kortum R. The pipeline still leaks and more than you think: a status report on gender diversity in biomedical engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38:1928–1935. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources