Variable reliability of endoscopic findings with white-light and narrow-band imaging for patients with suspected eosinophilic esophagitis - PubMed (original) (raw)

Variable reliability of endoscopic findings with white-light and narrow-band imaging for patients with suspected eosinophilic esophagitis

Anne F Peery et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Background & aims: Endoscopic findings have been used to support a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and to assess response to therapy, but their reliability is unknown. The aim of the study was to assess inter- and intraobserver reliability of endoscopic findings with white-light endoscopy and to assess changes in interobserver reliability when narrow band imaging (NBI) was added to white light.

Methods: We collected data from 35 academic and 42 community adult gastroenterologists using 2 self-administered, online assessments of endoscopic images in patients with suspected EoE. First, gastroenterologists evaluated 35 single white light images. Next, they examined 35 paired images of the initial white light image and its NBI counterpart. To assess intraobserver reliability, a second survey to re-examine the single white light images was performed ≥2 weeks later. Agreement was determined by calculating κ values for multiple observers.

Results: Among all gastroenterologists, interobserver agreement was fair to good when white light was used to identify rings (κ = 0.56) and furrows (κ = 0.48). Interobserver agreement was poor for identification of plaques (κ = 0.29) and for images with no findings (κ = 0.34). Levels of agreement did not change in an analysis stratified by practice setting or patient volume. Agreement did not improve when NBI images were added to white light images. Levels of intraobserver agreement varied greatly and in some cases were not greater than those expected by chance.

Conclusions: Using white light endoscopy and NBI to analyze EoE, gastroenterologists identified rings and furrows with fair to good reliability, but did not reliably identify plaques or normal images. Intraobserver agreement varied. Endoscopic findings might not be reliable for supporting a diagnosis of EoE or for making treatment decisions.

Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: No conflicts of interest exist for any author

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

(A) Endoscopic image in white light showing linear furrows, white plaques, and subtle rings. (B) The corresponding narrowing band image of the same endoscopic findings.

Figure 2

Figure 2

(A) Example of images for which there was good inter-observer agreement, with 88% of respondents identifying furrows, 9% no findings, 3% rings, and 1% plaques (endoscopic images in white light and NBI, respectively). (B) Example of images for which there was poor inter-observer agreement with 10% of respondents indentifying rings, 27% furrows, 43% plaques and 43% no findings (endoscopic images in white light and NBI, respectively).

Figure 2

Figure 2

(A) Example of images for which there was good inter-observer agreement, with 88% of respondents identifying furrows, 9% no findings, 3% rings, and 1% plaques (endoscopic images in white light and NBI, respectively). (B) Example of images for which there was poor inter-observer agreement with 10% of respondents indentifying rings, 27% furrows, 43% plaques and 43% no findings (endoscopic images in white light and NBI, respectively).

Figure 3

Figure 3

Histograms displaying the ranges of kappas for intra-observer reliability of EoE findings in white light for rings, furrows, plaques, and no findings.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Histograms displaying the ranges of kappas for intra-observer reliability of EoE findings in white light for rings, furrows, plaques, and no findings.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2007 Oct;133(4):1342–1363. - PubMed
    1. Noel RJ, Putnam PE, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilic esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 26;351(9):940–941. - PubMed
    1. Prasad GA, Alexander JA, Schleck CD, et al. Epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis over three decades in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;7(10):1055–1061. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Straumann A, Simon HU. Eosinophilic esophagitis: escalating epidemiology? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Feb;115(2):418–419. - PubMed
    1. Ronkainen J, Talley NJ, Aro P, et al. Prevalence of oesophageal eosinophils and eosinophilic oesophagitis in adults: the population-based Kalixanda study. Gut. 2007 May;56(5):615–620. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources