Competition and the evolution of reproductive restraint in malaria parasites - PubMed (original) (raw)

Competition and the evolution of reproductive restraint in malaria parasites

Laura C Pollitt et al. Am Nat. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

All organisms must trade off resource allocation between different life processes that determine their survival and reproduction. Malaria parasites replicate asexually in the host but must produce sexual stages to transmit between hosts. Because different specialized stages are required for these functions, the division of resources between these life-history components is a key problem for natural selection to solve. Despite the medical and economic importance of these parasites, their reproductive strategies remain poorly understood and often seem counterintuitive. Here, we tested recent theory predicting that in-host competition shapes how parasites trade off investment in in-host replication relative to between-host transmission. We demonstrate, across several genotypes, that Plasmodium chabaudi parasites detect the presence of competing genotypes and facultatively respond by reducing their investment in sexual stages in the manner predicted to maximize their competitive ability. Furthermore, we show that genotypes adjust their allocation to sexual stages in line with the availability of exploitable red blood cell resources. Our findings are predicted by evolutionary theory developed to explain life-history trade-offs in more traditionally studied multicellular taxa and suggest that the answer to the long-standing question of why so few transmission stages are produced is that in most natural infections heavy investment in reproduction may compromise in-host survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1. Genetic variation for investment in reproduction (transmission stages).

Shown is the production of gametocyte stages relative to asexual stages (conversion rate) for six wild-type Plasmodium chabaudi genotypes during the acute stage of infection. Error bars show the SEM for five independent infections per genotype.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Analysis of competitive suppression.

Competitive suppression of parasites led to reduced investment in reproduction (transmission) and lower gametocyte density. Shown are the conversion rate (A), gametocyte density (B), and asexual parasite density (C) for three focal genotypes alone (solid lines) and in competition (dashed lines). Error bars show the SEM for between five and 15 independent infections per group.

None

Malaria parasite transmission form in the blood.

Photograph by Sarah Reece.

References

    1. Achtman AH, Stephens R, Cadman ET, Harrison V, Langhorne J. Malaria-specific antibody responses and parasite persistence after infection of mice with Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi. Parasite Immunology. 2007;29:435–444. - PubMed
    1. Alizon S, van Baalen M. Transmission-virulence trade-offs in vector-borne diseases. Theoretical Population Biology. 2008;74:6–15. - PubMed
    1. Antia R, Yates A, de Roode JC. The dynamics of acute malaria infections. I. Effect of the parasite’s red blood cell preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2008;275:1449–1458. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babiker HA, Creasey AM, Fenton B, Bayoumi RAL, Arnot DE, Walliker D. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum in a village in eastern Sudan. I. Diversity of enzymes, 2D-PAGE proteins and antigens. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1991;85:572–577. - PubMed
    1. Babiker HA, Abdel-Muhsin A, Ranford-Cartwright L, Satti G, Walliker D. Characteristics of Plasmodium falciparum parasites that survive the lengthy dry season in eastern Sudan where malaria transmission is markedly seasonal. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1998;59:582–590. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources