Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning - PubMed (original) (raw)
Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning
Danielle S Bassett et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011.
Abstract
Human learning is a complex phenomenon requiring flexibility to adapt existing brain function and precision in selecting new neurophysiological activities to drive desired behavior. These two attributes--flexibility and selection--must operate over multiple temporal scales as performance of a skill changes from being slow and challenging to being fast and automatic. Such selective adaptability is naturally provided by modular structure, which plays a critical role in evolution, development, and optimal network function. Using functional connectivity measurements of brain activity acquired from initial training through mastery of a simple motor skill, we investigate the role of modularity in human learning by identifying dynamic changes of modular organization spanning multiple temporal scales. Our results indicate that flexibility, which we measure by the allegiance of nodes to modules, in one experimental session predicts the relative amount of learning in a future session. We also develop a general statistical framework for the identification of modular architectures in evolving systems, which is broadly applicable to disciplines where network adaptability is crucial to the understanding of system performance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Fig. 1.
Structure of the investigation. (A) To characterize the network structure of low-frequency functional connectivity (24) at each temporal scale, we partitioned the raw fMRI data (Upper Left) from each subject’s brain into signals originating from N = 112 cortical structures, which constitute the network’s nodes (Upper Right). The functional connectivity, constituting the network edges, between two cortical structures is given by a Pearson correlation between the mean regional activity signals (Lower Right). We then statistically corrected the resulting N × N correlation matrix using a false discovery rate correction (54) to construct a subject-specific weighted functional brain network (Lower Left). (B) Schematic of the investigation that was performed over the temporal scales of days, hours, and minutes. The complete experiment, which defines the largest scale, took place over the course of three days. At the intermediate scale, we conducted further investigations of the experimental sessions that occurred on each of those three days. Finally, to examine higher-frequency temporal structure, we cut each experimental session into 25 nonoverlapping windows, each of which was a few minutes in duration.
Fig. 2.
Multiscale modular architecture. (A) Results for the modular decomposition of functional connectivity across temporal scales. (Left) The network plots show the extracted modules; different colors indicate different modules and larger separation between modules is used to visualize weaker connections between them. (A) and (B) correspond to the entire experiment and individual sessions, respectively. Boxplots show the modularity index Q (Left) and the number of modules (Right) in the brain network compared to randomized networks. See Materials and Methods for a formal definition of Q. (C) Modularity index Q and the number of modules for the cortical (blue) compared to randomized networks (red) over the 75 time windows. Error bars indicate standard deviation in the mean over subjects.
Fig. 3.
Temporal dynamics of modular architecture. (A) Schematic of a toy network with four nodes and four edges in a single time window. (B) Multilayer network framework in which the networks from four time windows are linked by connecting nodes in one time window to themselves in the adjacent time windows (colored curves). (C) Statistical framework composed of a connectional null model (Top), a nodal null model (Middle), and a temporal null model (Bottom) in which intranetwork links, internetwork links, and time windows, respectively, in the real network are randomized in the permuted network. (We show all of the randomized links in red.) (D) Boxplots showing differences in modular architecture between the real and permuted networks for the connectional (Top), nodal (Middle), and temporal (Bottom) null models. We measured the structure of the network using the modularity index Q, the number of modules, the module size, and stationarity, which is defined as the mean similarity in the nodal composition of modules over consecutive time steps. Below each plot, we indicate by asterisks the significance of one-sample _t_-tests that assess whether the differences that we observed were significantly different from zero (gray lines): A single asterisk indicates p < .05, two asterisks indicate p < 1 × 10-6, and three asterisks indicate p < 1 × 10-20.
Fig. 4.
Flexibility and learning. (A) Boxplots showing that the increase in flexibility from experimental session 1 to session 2 was significantly greater than zero (a one-sample _t_-test gives the result t ≈ 6.00 with p ≈ 2 × 10-8), and that the magnitude of the decrease in flexibility from session 2 to session 3 was significantly greater than zero (t ≈ 7.46, p ≈ 2 × 10-11). (B) Significant predictive correlations between flexibility in session 1 and learning in session 2 (black curve, p ≈ 0.001) and between flexibility in session 2 and learning in session 3 (red curve, p ≈ 0.009). Note that relationships between learning and network flexibility in the same experimental sessions (1 and 2) were not significant; we obtained p > 0.13 using permutation tests. (C) Brain regions whose flexibility in session 1 predicted learning in session 2 (p < 0.05, uncorrected for multiple comparisons). Regions that also passed false-positive correction were the left anterior fusiform cortex and the right inferior frontal gyrus, thalamus, and nucleus accumbens. (D) Brain regions whose flexibility in session 2 predicted learning in session 3 (p < 0.05, uncorrected for multiple comparisons). Regions that also passed false-positive correction for multiple comparisons were the left intracalcarine cortex, paracingulate gyrus, precuneus, and lingual gyrus and the right superior frontal gyrus and precuneus cortex. In (C) and (D), colors indicate the Spearman correlation coefficient r between flexibility and learning.
Similar articles
- Reconfiguration of Brain Network Architectures between Resting-State and Complexity-Dependent Cognitive Reasoning.
Hearne LJ, Cocchi L, Zalesky A, Mattingley JB. Hearne LJ, et al. J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 30;37(35):8399-8411. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0485-17.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 31. J Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28760864 Free PMC article. - Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks.
Meunier D, Achard S, Morcom A, Bullmore E. Meunier D, et al. Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):715-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.062. Epub 2008 Nov 5. Neuroimage. 2009. PMID: 19027073 - Cohesive network reconfiguration accompanies extended training.
Telesford QK, Ashourvan A, Wymbs NF, Grafton ST, Vettel JM, Bassett DS. Telesford QK, et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Sep;38(9):4744-4759. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23699. Epub 2017 Jun 24. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017. PMID: 28646563 Free PMC article. - Developmental implications of children's brain networks and learning.
Chan JS, Wang Y, Yan JH, Chen H. Chan JS, et al. Rev Neurosci. 2016 Oct 1;27(7):713-727. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0007. Rev Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27362958 Review. - Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: behavior, function, and structure.
Herholz SC, Zatorre RJ. Herholz SC, et al. Neuron. 2012 Nov 8;76(3):486-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.011. Neuron. 2012. PMID: 23141061 Review.
Cited by
- Neural correlates of motor learning: Network communication versus local oscillations.
Mottaz A, Savic B, Allaman L, Guggisberg AG. Mottaz A, et al. Netw Neurosci. 2024 Oct 1;8(3):714-733. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00374. eCollection 2024. Netw Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39355447 Free PMC article. - Developmental differences in canonical cortical networks: Insights from microstructure-informed tractography.
Genc S, Schiavi S, Chamberland M, Tax CMW, Raven EP, Daducci A, Jones DK. Genc S, et al. Netw Neurosci. 2024 Oct 1;8(3):946-964. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00378. eCollection 2024. Netw Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39355444 Free PMC article. - Abnormal Dynamic Reconfiguration of Multilayer Temporal Networks in Patients with Bipolar Disorder.
Lai L, Li D, Zhang Y, Hao J, Wang X, Cui X, Xiang J, Wang B. Lai L, et al. Brain Sci. 2024 Sep 19;14(9):935. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090935. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 39335429 Free PMC article. - Aberrant Flexibility of Dynamic Brain Network in Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Zhang H, Peng D, Tang S, Bi A, Long Y. Zhang H, et al. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;11(9):882. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11090882. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39329624 Free PMC article. - Task-specific topology of brain networks supporting working memory and inhibition.
Adamovich T, Ismatullina V, Chipeeva N, Zakharov I, Feklicheva I, Malykh S. Adamovich T, et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Sep;45(13):e70024. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70024. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024. PMID: 39258339 Free PMC article.
References
- Kim JJ, Thompson RF. Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:177–181. - PubMed
- Büchel C, Coull JT, Friston KJ. The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. Science. 1999;283:1538–1541. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources