Mechanisms of estrogens' dose-dependent neuroprotective and neurodamaging effects in experimental models of cerebral ischemia - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Mechanisms of estrogens' dose-dependent neuroprotective and neurodamaging effects in experimental models of cerebral ischemia

Jakob O Strom et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2011.

Abstract

Ever since the hypothesis was put forward that estrogens could protect against cerebral ischemia, numerous studies have investigated the mechanisms of their effects. Despite initial studies showing ameliorating effects, later trials in both humans and animals have yielded contrasting results regarding the fundamental issue of whether estrogens are neuroprotective or neurodamaging. Therefore, investigations of the possible mechanisms of estrogen actions in brain ischemia have been difficult to assess. A recently published systematic review from our laboratory indicates that the dichotomy in experimental rat studies may be caused by the use of insufficiently validated estrogen administration methods resulting in serum hormone concentrations far from those intended, and that physiological estrogen concentrations are neuroprotective while supraphysiological concentrations augment the damage from cerebral ischemia. This evidence offers a new perspective on the mechanisms of estrogens' actions in cerebral ischemia, and also has a direct bearing on the hormone replacement therapy debate. Estrogens affect their target organs by several different pathways and receptors, and the mechanisms proposed for their effects on stroke probably prevail in different concentration ranges. In the current article, previously suggested neuroprotective and neurodamaging mechanisms are reviewed in a hormone concentration perspective in an effort to provide a mechanistic framework for the dose-dependent paradoxical effects of estrogens in stroke. It is concluded that five protective mechanisms, namely decreased apoptosis, growth factor regulation, vascular modulation, indirect antioxidant properties and decreased inflammation, and the proposed damaging mechanism of increased inflammation, are currently supported by experiments performed in optimal biological settings.

Keywords: administration methods; animal experiments; cerebral ischemia; estrogen; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A simplified map of suggested pathways and mechanisms for estrogens’ effects in stroke. Orange and blue rectangles mark plausibly detrimental and protective effects, respectively. The balance in the background symbolizes that depending on the circumstances, such as the dose of estrogen, either the protective or detrimental mechanisms may dominate. The “E” in the middle of the figure is short for “Estrogens” (other abbreviations are detailed above the Introduction). Depicted pathways and mechanisms have previously been reviewed in numerous publications [,,,–43]. Each part of the figure is matched with exact citations in respective sections throughout the article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hall ED, Pazara KE, Linseman KL. Sex differences in postischemic neuronal necrosis in gerbils. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:292–298. - PubMed
    1. Simpkins JW, Rajakumar G, Zhang YQ, Simpkins CE, Greenwald D, Yu CJ, Bodor N, Day AL. Estrogens may reduce mortality and ischemic damage caused by middle cerebral artery occlusion in the female rat. J. Neurosurg. 1997;87:724–730. - PubMed
    1. Hurn PD, Littleton-Kearney MT, Kirsch JR, Dharmarajan AM, Traystman RJ. Postischemic cerebral blood flow recovery in the female: Effect of 17beta-estradiol. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1995;15:666–672. - PubMed
    1. Lobo RA. The risk of stroke in postmenopausal women receiving hormonal therapy. Climacteric. 2009;12(Suppl 1):81–85. - PubMed
    1. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2002;288:321–333. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources