A new approach to account for the correlations among single nucleotide polymorphisms in genome: wide association studies - PubMed (original) (raw)

A new approach to account for the correlations among single nucleotide polymorphisms in genome: wide association studies

Zhongxue Chen et al. Hum Hered. 2011.

Abstract

In genetic association studies, such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can be as large as hundreds of thousands. Due to linkage disequilibrium, many SNPs are highly correlated; assuming they are independent is not valid. The commonly used multiple comparison methods, such as Bonferroni correction, are not appropriate and are too conservative when applied to GWAS. To overcome these limitations, many approaches have been proposed to estimate the so-called effective number of independent tests to account for the correlations among SNPs. However, many current effective number estimation methods are based on eigenvalues of the correlation matrix. When the dimension of the matrix is large, the numeric results may be unreliable or even unobtainable. To circumvent this obstacle and provide better estimates, we propose a new effective number estimation approach which is not based on the eigenvalues. We compare the new method with others through simulated and real data. The comparison results show that the proposed method has very good performance.

Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

The estimated effective numbers from various methods in simulation 1 (1, 2) and in simulation 2 (3, 4) with NP estimated at experiment-wise level 0.05 (1, 3) and 0.01 (2, 4). Perm = Permutation; L&J = Li and Ji.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

The estimated effective numbers from various methods in simulation 1 (1, 2) and in simulation 2 (3, 4) with NP estimated at experiment-wise level 0.05 (1, 3) and 0.01 (2, 4). Perm = Permutation; L&J = Li and Ji.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

The estimated effective numbers from various methods in simulation 1 (1, 2) and in simulation 2 (3, 4) with NP estimated at experiment-wise level 0.05 (1, 3) and 0.01 (2, 4). Perm = Permutation; L&J = Li and Ji.

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

The estimated effective numbers from various methods in simulation 1 (1, 2) and in simulation 2 (3, 4) with NP estimated at experiment-wise level 0.05 (1, 3) and 0.01 (2, 4). Perm = Permutation; L&J = Li and Ji.

References

    1. Šidák Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62:626–633.
    1. Bonferroni C. Studi in Onore del Professore Salvatore Ortu Carboni. Rome: 1935. Il calcolo delle assicurazioni su gruppi di teste; pp. 13–60.
    1. Bonferroni C. Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilità. vol 8. Firenze: R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali; 1936. pp. 3–62.
    1. Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994;138:963–971. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao X, Starmer J, Martin ER. A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genet Epidemiol. 2008;32:361–369. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources