Digital transplantation pathology: combining whole slide imaging, multiplex staining and automated image analysis - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Digital transplantation pathology: combining whole slide imaging, multiplex staining and automated image analysis
K Isse et al. Am J Transplant. 2012 Jan.
Abstract
Conventional histopathology is the gold standard for allograft monitoring, but its value proposition is increasingly questioned. "-Omics" analysis of tissues, peripheral blood and fluids and targeted serologic studies provide mechanistic insights into allograft injury not currently provided by conventional histology. Microscopic biopsy analysis, however, provides valuable and unique information: (a) spatial-temporal relationships; (b) rare events/cells; (c) complex structural context; and (d) integration into a "systems" model. Nevertheless, except for immunostaining, no transformative advancements have "modernized" routine microscopy in over 100 years. Pathologists now team with hardware and software engineers to exploit remarkable developments in digital imaging, nanoparticle multiplex staining, and computational image analysis software to bridge the traditional histology-global "-omic" analyses gap. Included are side-by-side comparisons, objective biopsy finding quantification, multiplexing, automated image analysis, and electronic data and resource sharing. Current utilization for teaching, quality assurance, conferencing, consultations, research and clinical trials is evolving toward implementation for low-volume, high-complexity clinical services like transplantation pathology. Cost, complexities of implementation, fluid/evolving standards, and unsettled medical/legal and regulatory issues remain as challenges. Regardless, challenges will be overcome and these technologies will enable transplant pathologists to increase information extraction from tissue specimens and contribute to cross-platform biomarker discovery for improved outcomes.
©Copyright 2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Figures
Figure 1
(A)WSIs of kidney allograft glomerulus (Upper left: H&E, Upper right: Methenamine sliver trichrome, Lower: H&E) were scanned with a 40X objective lens, 0.95 N.A. The higher resolution 40X WSI enables recognition of glomerular basement membrane splitting commonly associated with transplant glomerulopathy (arrows in Methenamine silver trichrome stain). Inset shows GBM splitting at higher magnification (see the scale). Inflammatory cell subtypes can be easy recognized (e.g. eosinophils (black arrows), plasma cells (black arrow heads), and lymphocytes infiltrating into tubules (yellow arrows)). The inset shows inflammatory cells at higher magnification (see the scale). Eosinophil granules and the perinuclear hof of plasma cells are clearly evident. B) WSIs of Masson’s Trichrome-stained liver allograft biopsy scanned using the same conditions as in (A). Upper Panel: Side-by-side comparison of biopsies obtained at 9 months and 36 months after transplantation, as shown here, is of great value in transplantation pathology and more effective and efficient than locating (and switching) glass slides on a traditional microscope. Middle Panel: The WSI viewer also enables a pixel-based color analysis, which can be trained to detect and segment colors of defined properties (e.g. blue fibrosis on trichrome stains) at any WSI magnification (left); higher magnification enables more accurate recognition of fine collagen bundles. The viewer then displays an area mask for user confirmation (right, yellow area) that is extended to the entire WSI. Lower: The WSI fraction of positive pixel area for fibrosis, or a chosen chromogen (e.g. DAB in brown or AEC in red) can be quantified and compared across samples. Color-based techniques combine the ability for a user to outline specific regions of interest (ROI) and measure the relative area of the positive color to the total tissue area; clear vascular spaces and fat globules, etc. are not included.
Figure 2
(A) “Traditional” setup for routine transplant histopathology consists of separate light and fluorescence microscopes usually in different locations with mounted cameras to capture and store region of interest (ROIs). Image capture is limited to ROIs and data management and image analysis are complex and time consuming. Fluorescence microscopy is usually located in a shared-resource facility; slide viewing is limited by photobleaching; and ROI capture, particularly for multiplex stains, is very time consuming and complex; and inconvenient data formats restrict distribution and intuitive use. (B) “Digital” setup converts routinely or multiplex-stained slides into a WSI replacing both the traditional brightfield (H&E, trichrome, etc.) and fluorescence (multiplex) microscopes [(Mirax MIDI (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) combined with a Plan-Apochromat 40x/.95 NA objective lens (Carl Zeiss), a Marlin F-146C Medical camera (arrow head) (ALLIED Vision Technologies, Newburyport, MA), an AxioCam MRm (Carl Zeiss) monochrome high-sensitivity digital charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (arrow) and specifically selected excitation/ emission Qdot filters (Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT)]. WSI files have a “pyramid” structure: the base layer represents the highest resolution data; other layers are digitally generated to facilitate rapid zooming and panning with a computer mouse. Once a WSI is generated, it can be shared over networks or the internet for discussion and collaboration. Users can review and annotate images anytime, anywhere, at any magnification and for any length of time without the consequence of photobleaching. Moreover, once the image is projected on the computer screen a toolset of image analysis functions becomes available. The pathologist can team with engineers and computer scientists to analyze images and data.
Figure 3
(A) Regions of interest (ROI) can be selected on the WSI at any magnification and individual tiles are exported to FarSight for analysis. In this example, an kidney allograft biopsy is stained for CD45RO (green), CD62L (red), CD3 (yellow), CD8 (cyan), and DAPI (blue). Each fluorescent layer is: 1) exported into grayscale images and imported into FARSIGHT, which 2) segments the nucleus, and 3) orientates the signals around the nucleus to find and represent the spatial relationship between the nucleus and cytoplasmic or cell surface analytes to provide detailed cell phenotypes. 4) The resultant FARSIGHT outcome provides scatter plots and spreadsheet capabilities for data visualization, review, and analysis. Overlays verify cell classification for positive (magenta) and negative (cyan) signals for each analyte in each cell, identified by its center point (centroid). More precise cell phenotype characterization is achievable by creating 3D scatter plots that allow for localization of high, intermediate, and low antigen expression, similar to traditional flow cytometry (left top; 3D plot graph). (B) The program also allows the user to select ROIs either using a box tool or free hand (pen or polygon) tool, and export whole ROIs into each fluorescence layer. Once completed, the images can be imported into FARSIGHT to be analyzed.
Similar articles
- Adding value to liver (and allograft) biopsy evaluation using a combination of multiplex quantum dot immunostaining, high-resolution whole-slide digital imaging, and automated image analysis.
Isse K, Grama K, Abbott IM, Lesniak A, Lunz JG, Lee WM, Specht S, Corbitt N, Mizuguchi Y, Roysam B, Demetris AJ. Isse K, et al. Clin Liver Dis. 2010 Nov;14(4):669-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2010.07.004. Clin Liver Dis. 2010. PMID: 21055689 Review. - Whole-slide imaging and automated image analysis: considerations and opportunities in the practice of pathology.
Webster JD, Dunstan RW. Webster JD, et al. Vet Pathol. 2014 Jan;51(1):211-23. doi: 10.1177/0300985813503570. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Vet Pathol. 2014. PMID: 24091812 Review. - Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring.
Wood-Trageser MA, Lesniak AJ, Demetris AJ. Wood-Trageser MA, et al. Transplantation. 2019 Jul;103(7):1306-1322. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002656. Transplantation. 2019. PMID: 30768568 Free PMC article. Review. - Software-assisted decision support in digital histopathology.
Huss R, Coupland SE. Huss R, et al. J Pathol. 2020 Apr;250(5):685-692. doi: 10.1002/path.5388. Epub 2020 Feb 25. J Pathol. 2020. PMID: 31994192 Review. - Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future.
Weinstein RS, Graham AR, Richter LC, Barker GP, Krupinski EA, Lopez AM, Erps KA, Bhattacharyya AK, Yagi Y, Gilbertson JR. Weinstein RS, et al. Hum Pathol. 2009 Aug;40(8):1057-69. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 Jun 24. Hum Pathol. 2009. PMID: 19552937
Cited by
- Digital pathology operations at a tertiary cancer center: Infrastructure requirements and operational cost.
Ardon O, Klein E, Manzo A, Corsale L, England C, Mazzella A, Geneslaw L, Philip J, Ntiamoah P, Wright J, Sirintrapun SJ, Lin O, Elenitoba-Johnson K, Reuter VE, Hameed MR, Hanna MG. Ardon O, et al. J Pathol Inform. 2023 May 16;14:100318. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100318. eCollection 2023. J Pathol Inform. 2023. PMID: 37811334 Free PMC article. - Thyroid Cytopathology Cancer Diagnosis from Smartphone Images Using Machine Learning.
Assaad S, Dov D, Davis R, Kovalsky S, Lee WT, Kahmke R, Rocke D, Cohen J, Henao R, Carin L, Range DE. Assaad S, et al. Mod Pathol. 2023 Jun;36(6):100129. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100129. Epub 2023 Feb 13. Mod Pathol. 2023. PMID: 36931041 Free PMC article. - Contemporary Whole Slide Imaging Devices and Their Applications within the Modern Pathology Department: A Selected Hardware Review.
Patel A, Balis UGJ, Cheng J, Li Z, Lujan G, McClintock DS, Pantanowitz L, Parwani A. Patel A, et al. J Pathol Inform. 2021 Dec 9;12:50. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_66_21. eCollection 2021. J Pathol Inform. 2021. PMID: 35070479 Free PMC article. Review. - Commentary: The Digital Fate of Glomeruli in Renal Biopsy.
Girolami I, Marletta S, Eccher A. Girolami I, et al. J Pathol Inform. 2021 Mar 22;12:14. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_102_20. eCollection 2021. J Pathol Inform. 2021. PMID: 34012718 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
- Mells G, Mann C, Hubscher S, Neuberger J. Late protocol liver biopsies in the liver allograft: a neglected investigation. Liver Transpl. 2009;15(8):931–938. - PubMed
- Sandipan Ray PJR, Rekha Jain, Kishore Gollapalli, Aliasgar Moiyadi, Sanjeeva Srivastava. Proteomic technologies for the identification of disease biomarkers in serum: advances and challenges ahead. Proteomics. 2011 - PubMed
- Jara-Lazaro AR, Thamboo TP, Teh M, Tan PH. Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice. Pathology. 2010;42(6):512–518. - PubMed
- Yagi Y, Gilbertson JR. Digital Pathology from the Past to the Future. Journal of eHealth Technology and Application. 2010;8(2):73–80.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- N01AI15416/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- P01 AI081678/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- P01 AI064343/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01-EB-005157/EB/NIBIB NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA135509/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01-A1-077867/PHS HHS/United States
- R01-CA-135509/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 AI015416/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01 EB005157/EB/NIBIB NIH HHS/United States
- P01-A1-064343/PHS HHS/United States
- R01-AI-081678/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous