Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research - PubMed (original) (raw)
Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research
Jeremy Phillipson et al. J Environ Manage. 2012 Mar.
Abstract
It is commonly put forward that effective uptake of research in policy or practice must be built upon a foundation of active knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement during the research. However, what is often lacking is a systematic appreciation of the specific practices of knowledge exchange and their relative merits. The paper reports on a 2009 survey of 21 research projects within the UK Research Councils' Rural Economy and Land Use Programme regarding the involvement and perceived impact of over a thousand stakeholders in the research. The survey reveals that most stakeholders were involved as research subjects or as event participants. Large numbers were also engaged in the research process itself, including involvement in shaping the direction of research. Stakeholder engagement is perceived as bringing significant benefits to the process of knowledge production. A close relationship is found between mechanisms and approaches to knowledge exchange and the spread of benefits for researchers and stakeholders. Mutual benefits are gained from exchange of staff or where stakeholders are members of research advisory groups. Different stakeholder sectors are also associated with different patterns of engagement, which lead to contrasting impact patterns. Any efforts to alter knowledge exchange processes and outcomes must overcome these differing engagement tendencies. Overall, much greater attention should be given to early processes of knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement within the lifetime of research projects.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management.
Reed MS, Stringer LC, Fazey I, Evely AC, Kruijsen JHJ. Reed MS, et al. J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:337-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Sep 6. J Environ Manage. 2014. PMID: 25194520 - Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews [Internet].
Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, Hoomans T, Meltzer D, Noorani H, Robinson K, Schoelles K, Motu'apuaka M, Anderson J, Paynter R, Guise JM. Cottrell E, et al. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Mar. Report No.: 14-EHC006-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Mar. Report No.: 14-EHC006-EF. PMID: 24783309 Free Books & Documents. Review. - Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.
Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, Sabharwal R, Rein A, Konopka K, Frank L. Forsythe LP, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26160480 Free PMC article. - Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts.
Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, Graham E, Thomas A, Sprung J, Morris C, Russell DJ. Camden C, et al. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1390-400. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.963705. Epub 2014 Sep 22. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25243763 Review. - Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice.
Keown K, Van Eerd D, Irvin E. Keown K, et al. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Spring;28(2):67-72. doi: 10.1002/chp.159. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008. PMID: 18521874
Cited by
- Co-design knowledge mobilization tools for universal accessibility in municipalities.
Corcuff M, Lamontagne ME, Routhier F, Morales E. Corcuff M, et al. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jul 1;5:1331728. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1331728. eCollection 2024. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024. PMID: 39011086 Free PMC article. - Combining Stakeholder- and Social Network- Analysis to Improve Regional Nature Conservation: A Case Study from Osnabrück, Germany.
Przesdzink F, Herzog LM, Fiebelkorn F. Przesdzink F, et al. Environ Manage. 2022 Feb;69(2):271-287. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01564-w. Epub 2021 Nov 30. Environ Manage. 2022. PMID: 34850249 Free PMC article. - Assessing higher education institutional stakeholders' perceptions and needs for community engagement: An empirical evidence from Uganda.
Sheila NA, Zhu C, Kintu MJ, Kataike J. Sheila NA, et al. Heliyon. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):e06612. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06612. eCollection 2021 Apr. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 33889765 Free PMC article. - Maximising engagement and participation of intellectual disability staff in research: Insights from conducting a UK-wide survey.
Lam CKK, Bernal J, Finlayson J, Todd S, Taggart L, Boaz A, Tuffrey-Wijne I. Lam CKK, et al. J Intellect Disabil. 2021 Dec;25(4):554-566. doi: 10.1177/1744629520924141. Epub 2020 May 12. J Intellect Disabil. 2021. PMID: 32394781 Free PMC article. - Examining the Impact of Knowledge Mobilization Strategies to Inform Urban Stakeholders on Accessibility: A Mixed-Methods study.
Labbé D, Mahmood A, Miller WC, Mortenson WB. Labbé D, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 28;17(5):1561. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051561. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32121293 Free PMC article.