Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2011 Dec 2;9(6):588-98.
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.11.003.
Styliani Markoulaki, Jacob H Hanna, Dina A Faddah, Yosef Buganim, Jongpil Kim, Kibibi Ganz, Eveline J Steine, John P Cassady, Menno P Creyghton, G Grant Welstead, Qing Gao, Rudolf Jaenisch
Affiliations
- PMID: 22136932
- DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.11.003
Free article
Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells
Bryce W Carey et al. Cell Stem Cell. 2011.
Free article
Abstract
We compared two genetically highly defined transgenic systems to identify parameters affecting reprogramming of somatic cells to a pluripotent state. Our results demonstrate that the level and stoichiometry of reprogramming factors during the reprogramming process strongly influence the resulting pluripotency of iPS cells. High expression of Oct4 and Klf4 combined with lower expression of c-Myc and Sox2 produced iPS cells that efficiently generated "all-iPSC mice" by tetraploid (4n) complementation, maintained normal imprinting at the Dlk1-Dio3 locus, and did not create mice with tumors. Loss of imprinting (LOI) at the Dlk1-Dio3 locus did not strictly correlate with reduced pluripotency though the efficiency of generating "all-iPSC mice" was diminished. Our data indicate that stoichiometry of reprogramming factors can influence epigenetic and biological properties of iPS cells. This concept complicates efforts to define a "generic" epigenetic state of iPSCs and ESCs and should be considered when comparing different iPS and ES cell lines.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
- Optimal stoichiometry for pluripotency.
Baker M. Baker M. Nat Methods. 2012 Feb;9(2):122-3. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1883. Nat Methods. 2012. PMID: 22396968 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Excluding Oct4 from Yamanaka Cocktail Unleashes the Developmental Potential of iPSCs.
Velychko S, Adachi K, Kim KP, Hou Y, MacCarthy CM, Wu G, Schöler HR. Velychko S, et al. Cell Stem Cell. 2019 Dec 5;25(6):737-753.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 7. Cell Stem Cell. 2019. PMID: 31708402 Free PMC article. - Residual expression of reprogramming factors affects the transcriptional program and epigenetic signatures of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Sommer CA, Christodoulou C, Gianotti-Sommer A, Shen SS, Sailaja BS, Hezroni H, Spira A, Meshorer E, Kotton DN, Mostoslavsky G. Sommer CA, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051711. Epub 2012 Dec 14. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23272148 Free PMC article. - Tbx3 improves the germ-line competency of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Han J, Yuan P, Yang H, Zhang J, Soh BS, Li P, Lim SL, Cao S, Tay J, Orlov YL, Lufkin T, Ng HH, Tam WL, Lim B. Han J, et al. Nature. 2010 Feb 25;463(7284):1096-100. doi: 10.1038/nature08735. Epub 2010 Feb 7. Nature. 2010. PMID: 20139965 Free PMC article. - Mechanism of Induction: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs).
Singh VK, Kumar N, Kalsan M, Saini A, Chandra R. Singh VK, et al. J Stem Cells. 2015;10(1):43-62. J Stem Cells. 2015. PMID: 26665937 Review. - [Induction and characterization of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells: a review].
Cheng D, Lei L, Lu Z, Li Z, Wang H. Cheng D, et al. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2010 Apr;26(4):421-30. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2010. PMID: 20575428 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
- Does transcription factor induced pluripotency accurately mimic embryo derived pluripotency?
Lowry WE. Lowry WE. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012 Oct;22(5):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Oct 15. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012. PMID: 23079387 Free PMC article. Review. - Proliferation history and transcription factor levels drive direct conversion.
Wang NB, Lende-Dorn BA, Adewumi HO, Beitz AM, Han P, O'Shea TM, Galloway KE. Wang NB, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Nov 27:2023.11.26.568736. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.26.568736. bioRxiv. 2023. PMID: 38077004 Free PMC article. Preprint. - Epigenetic obstacles encountered by transcription factors: reprogramming against all odds.
Gifford CA, Meissner A. Gifford CA, et al. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012 Oct;22(5):409-15. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 23. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012. PMID: 22922161 Free PMC article. Review. - Genetic and epigenetic variations in iPSCs: potential causes and implications for application.
Liang G, Zhang Y. Liang G, et al. Cell Stem Cell. 2013 Aug 1;13(2):149-59. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.001. Cell Stem Cell. 2013. PMID: 23910082 Free PMC article. Review. - Elevating SOX2 Downregulates MYC through a SOX2:MYC Signaling Axis and Induces a Slowly Cycling Proliferative State in Human Tumor Cells.
Metz EP, Wilder PJ, Popay TM, Wang J, Liu Q, Kalluchi A, Rowley MJ, Tansey WP, Rizzino A. Metz EP, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;14(8):1946. doi: 10.3390/cancers14081946. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35454854 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 5-RO1-CA087869/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 5-RO1-HDO45022/PHS HHS/United States
- 5-R37-CA084198/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R37 CA084198/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA087869/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HD045022/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA084198/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources