Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review

Trisha Greenhalgh et al. J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

The literature on 'knowledge translation' presents challenges for the reviewer because different terms have been used to describe the generation, sharing and application of knowledge and different research approaches embrace different philosophical positions on what knowledge is. We present a narrative review of this literature which deliberately sought to highlight rather than resolve tensions between these different framings. Our findings suggest that while 'translation' is a widely used metaphor in medicine, it constrains how we conceptualise and study the link between knowledge and practice. The 'translation' metaphor has, arguably, led to particular difficulties in the fields of 'evidence-based management' and 'evidence-based policymaking' - where it seems that knowledge obstinately refuses to be driven unproblematically into practice. Many non-medical disciplines such as philosophy, sociology and organization science conceptualise knowledge very differently, as being (for example) 'created', 'constructed', 'embodied', 'performed' and 'collectively negotiated' - and also as being value-laden and tending to serve the vested interests of dominant élites. We propose that applying this wider range of metaphors and models would allow us to research the link between knowledge and practice in more creative and critical ways. We conclude that research should move beyond a narrow focus on the 'know-do gap' to cover a richer agenda, including: (a) the situation-specific practical wisdom (phronesis) that underpins clinical judgement; (b) the tacit knowledge that is built and shared among practitioners ('mindlines'); (c) the complex links between power and knowledge; and (d) approaches to facilitating macro-level knowledge partnerships between researchers, practitioners, policymakers and commercial interests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Royer P [Medical applications and therapeutic prospects deduced from knowledge in molecular pathology]. Biochimie 1972;54:789–99 - PubMed
    1. Woolf SH The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters. JAMA 2008;299:211–13 - PubMed
    1. Cooksey D A review of UK health research funding. London: HMSO, 2006 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward V, House AO, Hamer S Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: A thematic analysis of the literature. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009;14:1–156 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Contandriopoulos D, Lemire M, Denis J-L, Tremblay É Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 2010;88:444–83 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources