Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed (original) (raw)
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Mar 10;379(9819):905-914.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61710-8. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
Affiliations
- PMID: 22293369
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61710-8
Free article
Meta-Analysis
Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Christopher E Clark et al. Lancet. 2012.
Free article
Erratum in
- Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):218
Abstract
Background: Differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 10 mm Hg or more or 15 mm Hg or more between arms have been associated with peripheral vascular disease and attributed to subclavian stenosis. We investigated whether an association exists between this difference and central or peripheral vascular disease, and mortality.
Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, and Medline In Process databases for studies published before July, 2011, showing differences in SBP between arms, with data for subclavian stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease, or survival. We used random effects meta-analysis to combine estimates of the association between differences in SBP between arms and each outcome.
Findings: We identified 28 eligible studies for review, 20 of which were included in our meta-analyses. In five invasive studies using angiography, mean difference in SBP between arms was 36·9 mm Hg (95% CI 35·4-38·4) for proven subclavian stenosis (>50% occlusion), and a difference of 10 mm Hg or more was strongly associated with subclavian stenosis (risk ratio [RR] 8·8, 95% CI 3·6-21·2). In non-invasive studies, pooled findings showed that a difference of 15 mm Hg or more was associated with peripheral vascular disease (nine cohorts; RR 2·5, 95% CI 1·6-3·8; sensitivity 15%, 9-23; specificity 96%, 94-98); pre-existing cerebrovascular disease (five cohorts; RR 1·6, 1·1-2·4; sensitivity 8%, 2-26; specificity 93%, 86-97); and increased cardiovascular mortality (four cohorts; hazard ratio [HR] 1·7, 95% CI 1·1-2·5) and all-cause mortality (HR 1·6, 1·1-2·3). A difference of 10 mm Hg or higher was associated with peripheral vascular disease (five studies; RR 2·4, 1·5-3·9; sensitivity 32%, 23-41; specificity 91%, 86-94).
Interpretation: A difference in SBP of 10 mm Hg or more, or of 15 mm Hg or more, between arms might help to identify patients who need further vascular assessment. A difference of 15 mm Hg or more could be a useful indicator of risk of vascular disease and death.
Funding: Royal College of General Practitioners, South West GP Trust, and Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
- Do differences in blood pressure between arms matter?
McManus RJ, Mant J. McManus RJ, et al. Lancet. 2012 Mar 10;379(9819):872-873. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61926-0. Epub 2012 Jan 30. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22293365 No abstract available. - Interarm blood pressure difference and vascular disease.
Nadir MA. Nadir MA. Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):23; author reply 24-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61116-7. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22770448 No abstract available. - Interarm blood pressure difference and vascular disease.
Kleefstra N, Houweling ST, Bilo HJ. Kleefstra N, et al. Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):23; author reply 24-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61115-5. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22770449 No abstract available. - Interarm blood pressure difference and vascular disease.
Vroomen PC, Aries MJ. Vroomen PC, et al. Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):24; author reply 24-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61117-9. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22770450 No abstract available. - Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference is a useful predictor for clinical outcome.
Cao K, Su H. Cao K, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;198:81-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.109. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Int J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26159241 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources