Foxp-mediated suppression of N-cadherin regulates neuroepithelial character and progenitor maintenance in the CNS - PubMed (original) (raw)
Foxp-mediated suppression of N-cadherin regulates neuroepithelial character and progenitor maintenance in the CNS
David L Rousso et al. Neuron. 2012.
Abstract
Neuroepithelial attachments at adherens junctions are essential for the self-renewal of neural stem and progenitor cells and the polarized organization of the developing central nervous system. The balance between stem cell maintenance and differentiation depends on the precise assembly and disassembly of these adhesive contacts, but the gene regulatory mechanisms orchestrating this process are not known. Here, we demonstrate that two Forkhead transcription factors, Foxp2 and Foxp4, are progressively expressed upon neural differentiation in the spinal cord. Elevated expression of either Foxp represses the expression of a key component of adherens junctions, N-cadherin, and promotes the detachment of differentiating neurons from the neuroepithelium. Conversely, inactivation of Foxp2 and Foxp4 function in both chick and mouse results in a spectrum of neural tube defects associated with neuroepithelial disorganization and enhanced progenitor maintenance. Together, these data reveal a Foxp-based transcriptional mechanism that regulates the integrity and cytoarchitecture of neuroepithelial progenitors.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Figure 1. Elevated Foxp4 Expression Coincides with Neuronal Differentiation and Neuroepithelial Detachment
(A–E) Foxp2, Foxp4, and Foxp1 are successively expressed by differentiating MN progenitors and other spinal NPCs. Foxp4 levels increase during this transition. (F–K) Foxp4low cells express Sox2; Foxp4high cells express the proneural proteins Ngn2 and NeuroM, and display cytoplasmically localized Numb. Foxp2 and Foxp4 are absent from mature NeuN+ Isl2+ MNs. (L–P) Neuroepithelial attachment, cell cycle exit, and neuronal maturation are distinguished by HRP injections into the ventricle, rhodamine-dextran injections into the ventral roots, and BrdU labeling. (Q) Quantification of Foxp4 levels in HRP+ (neuroepithelial) and HRP− (detached) cells. Mean pixel intensities ± SEM calculated from at least 25 cells per group from multiple embryos are shown. ***p < 0.001. (R–V) The sequential pattern of Foxp expression is conserved in the mouse spinal cord. (U) At e11.5, Foxp4 is also observed in a putative LMC motor pool, and in numerous interneurons (INs). (W) Summary of Foxp4 and Foxp2 expression during MN differentiation. AJs, adherens junctions. See also Figure S1.
Figure 2. Foxp2 and Foxp4 Promote Neurogenesis and Suppress Neuroepithelial Character
(A, C, and D) Analysis of spinal cords transfected with _CMV::IRES-nEGFP_-control or (B, E, and F) _CMV::Foxp4_-_IRES_-nEGFP expression vectors. Brackets with asterisks indicate areas of ectopic neurogenesis. (G and H) Quantification of changes in neurogenesis. NPC, Sox2+; Neuron, NeuN+; pMN, Olig2+; MN, Isl1/2+. Mean ± SEM from multiple sections taken from 5 embryos for each condition are shown. ***p < 0.001. (J–U) Analysis of spinal cords transfected with Foxp2 and Foxp4 shRNA-IRES-nEGFP vectors or a nontargeting control shRNA-IRES-nEGFP vector. Most double-knockdown (dKD) cells express Sox2 and do not form NeuN+ neurons (asterisk in K and M). Some dKD cells differentiate within the neuroepithelium (arrows in O). Asterisk in (Q) indicates a dorsal expansion of Olig2+ MN progenitors; brackets denote a decrease in MNs. (R and S) Foxp2/4 dKD MNs extend Hb9::LacZ+ axons toward the periphery (arrows), but their cell bodies fail to migrate laterally (arrowheads). (T and U) Foxp2/4 dKD MNs retain apical attachments (open arrowhead) and radial morphology. (I) Summary of the effects of Foxp2 and Foxp4 manipulation on neurogenesis and apical attachment. See also Figures S2, S3, and S4.
Figure 3. Foxp4 Represses N-Cadherin and Influences Adherens Junction Ultrastructure
(A–E) Transverse and open book views of the spinal cord reveal differential expression of Foxp4 and N-cadherin in distinct progenitor (p) domains. d, dorsal; v, ventral; m, medial; l, lateral; r, rostral; c, caudal. (F) N-cadherin and Foxp4 expression are inversely correlated [f(x) f _x_−0.75, R2 = 0.722]. (G–R) Analysis of spinal cords transfected with (G-L) _CMV::IRES-nEGFP_-control or (M-R) _CMV::Foxp4_-_IRES_-nEGFP vectors. + indicates the transfected side of the spinal cord. Arrows and arrowheads indicate apical membranes and radial processes, respectively. Asterisks denote disruptions in neuroepithelial cytoarchitecture. Arrows in (J) and (P) indicate the intact pial surface. (K and Q) Transmission electron micrograph of normal (arrowheads) and disrupted AJs. N, nucleus. (L and R) Open book view of Numb anchored to the apical membrane and its redistribution after Foxp4 misexpression. (S and T) N-cadherin and Numb accumulate at the apical surface of the neuroepithelium upon Foxp2/4 double knockdown. (U) Summary of the suppressive effects of Foxp4 and Foxp2 on N-cadherin and AJ maintenance. See also Figures S2, S3, S4, and S5.
Figure 4. N-Cadherin Is a Primary Target of Foxp4
(A–O) Analysis of spinal cords transfected at e3 with a _CMV::Foxp4_-IRES-nEGFP expression vector and collected 12, 24, and 36 hr later. N-cadherin protein declines (asterisk) between 12 and 24 hr posttransfection while Sox2 perdures. By 24 hr, Numb accumulates in the cytoplasm (bracket). At R 36 hr, Sox2 is abolished and cytoplasmic Numb is associated with ectopic NeuN+ neurons. (P) Quantitative PCR analysis of gene expression 6 and 12 hr after Foxp4 transfection relative to control electroporations. Mean _Gapdh_-normalized mRNA expression levels ± SEM from at least 3 embryos per condition are shown. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. (Q) Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of Foxp4 and Sox2 at evolutionarily conserved regions of the Cdh2 (N-cadherin) locus indicated by the orange lines. Foxp4 shows significant binding to an element in intron 3 [i3a] relative to other regions in the Cdh2 locus and unrelated genes such as Gapdh. Sox2 binds to an element in intron 2 [i2a] but not to regions where Foxp4 is bound. Mean binding activity ± SEM from four experiments is plotted. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001. See also Figure S6.
Figure 5. Sox2 and N-Cadherin Promote Neuroepithelial Character and Oppose Foxp4 Function
(A, F, K, and P) Analysis of spinal cords transfected with a CMV::IRES-nEGFP control vector compared to equivalent vectors encoding: (B, G, L, and Q) dominant-negative N-cadherin at high (dnN-cadhigh) or (C, H, M, and R) low (dnN-cadlow) dosage; (D, I, N, and S) full-length N-cadherin; (E, J, O, and T) Sox2. Most cells transfected with dnN-cadhigh or dnN-cadlow express NeuN and lack neuroepithelial characteristics. Full-length N-cadherin maintains cells in an NPC-like state within the VZ (D), similar to Sox2 (E). Arrows and brackets with asterisks denote the normal and altered distribution of proteins, respectively. + indicates the transfected side of the spinal cord. (U–Y) Summaries of the effects of manipulating N-cadherin or Sox2 on neurogenesis and apical attachment. (Z–AE) Cotransfection of Foxp4 with full-length N-cadherin or Sox2 restores neuroepithelial character. Asterisk in (AC) indicates region of Foxp4-induced neuroepithelial disruption. Arrowheads in (AD)–(AE) indicate restoration of radial fibers. (AF) Quantitation of Sox2+ NPCs and NeuN+ neurons in the ventral VZ under the indicated conditions. Plots show mean ± SEM from multiple sections collected from 3–5 embryos for each condition. ***p < 0.001. (AG) Summary of the opposing actions of Foxp4 and Sox2 in regulating N-cadherin expression and progenitor maintenance.
Figure 6. Proneural Gene Activity Requires Foxp2/4 Function to Promote Neurogenesis
(A) Outline of the double transfection protocol. CMV::nuclear-tagged LacZ (nLacZ) and CMV::nuclear Myc-tags (nMyc) distinguish the first and second transfections, respectively. (B) Model of the neural tube showing the region analyzed. Costaining with β-gal, Myc, and markers for Sox2+ NPCs or NeuN+ neurons results in “white” triple-labeled cells in (H)–(Q). (C, H, and M) Cells doubly transfected with control vectors comprise NPCs and neurons equally. (D, I, and N) Cells doubly transfected with control vectors followed by Ngn2 predominantly form neurons in the MZ. Cells doubly transfected with Foxp2/4 shRNA followed by control (E, J, and O) or Ngn2 vectors (F, K, and P) do not form neurons and remain in the VZ. (G, L, and Q) Cells doubly transfected with Foxp2/4 shRNA followed by low amounts of the dnN-cad vector detach and differentiate. (R–V) Summary of double transfection results. (W) Quantification of progenitor versus neuronal fates of doubly transfected cells. Plots display mean ± SEM for 250–500 β-gal+Myc+ cells from multiple sections taken from at least 3 embryos for each vector combination. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant. (X) Summary of relationships between proneural genes, Foxp activity, and neuroepithelial adhesion. See also Figure S7. (C) Plot of the frequency of neural tube defects (NTD) seen in Foxp4 mutant embryos. (D and E) Example of intermediate holoprosencephaly at e12.5 resulting from Foxp4 deletion. (F–I) Analysis of e10.5 control and (J-M) Foxp4LacZ/LacZ mutant spinal cords. (N–Q) Analysis of e12.5 control and (R–U) Foxp4Neo/LacZ mutant cortex. N-cadherin is inversely correlated with Foxp2 and Foxp4 expression in control mice and upregulated in Foxp4 mutants. (Q and U) NeuN+ neurons form inappropriately within the VZ of the Foxp4 mutant cortex (arrowheads in U). (V–Y) In utero electroporation of CMV::IRES-nEGFP control and (Z–AC) _CMV::Foxp4-IRES_-nEGFP vectors in the e14.5 cerebral cortex suppresses N-cadherin, Sox2, and β-catenin, leading to ectopic neuronal differentiation. (AD) Quantitation of Foxp2and N-cadherin protein as a function of mediolateral position in controland _Foxp4Neo/LacZ_mutant cortices averaged across multiple sections. (AE) Quantitation of the total number of spinal and cortical NPCs (Sox2+) and neurons (NeuN+) in Foxp4 mutants relative to littermate controls. Mean ± SEM for multiple sections taken from 5–10 embryos for each genotype is shown. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant. (AF) Quantitation of the effects of Foxp4 misexpression on cortical neurogenesis. Plots show mean ± SEM for multiple sections taken from 5 embryos for each condition. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S8.
Figure 7. _Foxp4_-Deficient Mice Exhibit Defects in Neural Tube Morphology and Enhanced Progenitor Maintenance
(A) Diagram of Foxp4 mutant alleles. (B) Early lethality occurs by e11.5 in Foxp4LacZ/LacZ mutants relative to Foxp4Neo/Neo mice. *p < 0.05; c2 = 6.39.
Figure 8. Opponent Activities of Foxp and Sox2 Regulate Neuroepithelial Niche Maintenance by Modulating N-Cadherin Expression
(A) Model depicting how Foxp-mediated suppression of N-cadherin offsets the progenitor maintenance activity of Sox2 and promotes neuroepithelial delamination. Sox2 provides positive inputs onto N-cadherin gene expression to maintain the neuroepithelial niche and ensure the apical localization of AJ components such as Numb. (B) Elevated Foxp expression levels within neural progenitors eliminate N-cadherin-based AJs and promote ectopic neurogenesis. (C) Loss of Foxp2 and Foxp4 function enhances apical AJs and maintenance of neuroepithelial progenitors.
Comment in
- Crucial first steps: the transcriptional control of neuron delamination.
Pacary E, Martynoga B, Guillemot F. Pacary E, et al. Neuron. 2012 Apr 26;74(2):209-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.002. Neuron. 2012. PMID: 22542173
Similar articles
- An evolutionary recent neuroepithelial cell adhesion function of huntingtin implicates ADAM10-Ncadherin.
Lo Sardo V, Zuccato C, Gaudenzi G, Vitali B, Ramos C, Tartari M, Myre MA, Walker JA, Pistocchi A, Conti L, Valenza M, Drung B, Schmidt B, Gusella J, Zeitlin S, Cotelli F, Cattaneo E. Lo Sardo V, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2012 May;15(5):713-21. doi: 10.1038/nn.3080. Nat Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22466506 - Identification of self-replicating multipotent progenitors in the embryonic nervous system by high Notch activity and Hes5 expression.
Basak O, Taylor V. Basak O, et al. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Feb;25(4):1006-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05370.x. Eur J Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17331197 - Tcf/Lef repressors differentially regulate Shh-Gli target gene activation thresholds to generate progenitor patterning in the developing CNS.
Wang H, Lei Q, Oosterveen T, Ericson J, Matise MP. Wang H, et al. Development. 2011 Sep;138(17):3711-21. doi: 10.1242/dev.068270. Epub 2011 Jul 20. Development. 2011. PMID: 21775418 Free PMC article. - Olig gene function in CNS development and disease.
Ligon KL, Fancy SP, Franklin RJ, Rowitch DH. Ligon KL, et al. Glia. 2006 Jul;54(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/glia.20273. Glia. 2006. PMID: 16652341 Review. - FOXP transcription factors in vertebrate brain development, function, and disorders.
Co M, Anderson AG, Konopka G. Co M, et al. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2020 Sep;9(5):e375. doi: 10.1002/wdev.375. Epub 2020 Jan 30. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2020. PMID: 31999079 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Compensation between FOXP transcription factors maintains proper striatal function.
Ahmed NI, Khandelwal N, Anderson AG, Oh E, Vollmer RM, Kulkarni A, Gibson JR, Konopka G. Ahmed NI, et al. Cell Rep. 2024 May 28;43(5):114257. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114257. Epub 2024 May 17. Cell Rep. 2024. PMID: 38761373 Free PMC article. - Foxp1 suppresses cortical angiogenesis and attenuates HIF-1alpha signaling to promote neural progenitor cell maintenance.
Buth JE, Dyevich CE, Rubin A, Wang C, Gao L, Marks T, Harrison MR, Kong JH, Ross ME, Novitch BG, Pearson CA. Buth JE, et al. EMBO Rep. 2024 May;25(5):2202-2219. doi: 10.1038/s44319-024-00131-8. Epub 2024 Apr 10. EMBO Rep. 2024. PMID: 38600346 Free PMC article. - Spatial transcriptomics and single-nucleus RNA sequencing reveal a transcriptomic atlas of adult human spinal cord.
Zhang D, Chen Y, Wei Y, Chen H, Wu Y, Wu L, Li J, Ren Q, Miao C, Zhu T, Liu J, Ke B, Zhou C. Zhang D, et al. Elife. 2024 Jan 30;12:RP92046. doi: 10.7554/eLife.92046. Elife. 2024. PMID: 38289829 Free PMC article. - Targeted mutagenesis in mice via an engineered AsCas12f1 system.
Fan P, Wang H, Zhao F, Zhang T, Li J, Sun X, Yu Y, Xiong H, Lai L, Sui T. Fan P, et al. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024 Jan 28;81(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s00018-023-05100-3. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024. PMID: 38280977 Free PMC article. - Homemade: building the structure of the neurogenic niche.
Valamparamban GF, Spéder P. Valamparamban GF, et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Dec 1;11:1275963. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1275963. eCollection 2023. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023. PMID: 38107074 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Amorosi S, D’Armiento M, Calcagno G, Russo I, Adriani M, Christiano AM, Weiner L, Brissette JL, Pignata C. FOXN1 homozygous mutation associated with anencephaly and severe neural tube defect in human athymic Nude/SCID fetus. Clin. Genet. 2008;73:380–384. - PubMed
- Banham AH, Beasley N, Campo E, Fernandez PL, Fidler C, Gatter K, Jones M, Mason DY, Prime JE, Trougouboff P, et al. The FOXP1 winged helix transcription factor is a novel candidate tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 3p. Cancer Res. 2001;61:8820–8829. - PubMed
- Boiani M, Schöler HR. Regulatory networks in embryo-derived pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;6:872–884. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 HL071589/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- NS053976/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 NS053976/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- NS072804/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 NS053976-01/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- T32 NS007449/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- MH083785/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- T32 NS07449/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- HL071589/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 NS072804-01/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 NS072804/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH083785/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials