Attention deficits predict phenotypic outcomes in syndrome-specific and domain-specific ways - PubMed (original) (raw)

Attention deficits predict phenotypic outcomes in syndrome-specific and domain-specific ways

K Cornish et al. Front Psychol. 2012.

Abstract

Attentional difficulties, both at home and in the classroom, are reported across a number of neurodevelopmental disorders. However, exactly how attention influences early socio-cognitive learning remains unclear. We addressed this question both concurrently and longitudinally in a cross-syndrome design, with respect to the communicative domain of vocabulary and to the cognitive domain of early literacy, and then extended the analysis to social behavior. Participants were young children (aged 4-9 years at Time 1) with either Williams syndrome (WS, N = 26) or Down syndrome (DS, N = 26) and typically developing controls (N = 103). Children with WS displayed significantly greater attentional deficits (as indexed by teacher report of behavior typical of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) than children with DS, but both groups had greater attentional problems than the controls. Despite their attention differences, children with DS and those with WS were equivalent in their cognitive abilities of reading single words, both at Time 1 and 12 months later, at Time 2, although they differed in their early communicative abilities in terms of vocabulary. Greater ADHD-like behaviors predicted poorer subsequent literacy for children with DS, but not for children with WS, pointing to syndrome-specific attentional constraints on specific aspects of early development. Overall, our findings highlight the need to investigate more precisely whether and, if so, how, syndrome-specific profiles of behavioral difficulties constrain learning and socio-cognitive outcomes across different domains.

Keywords: Down syndrome; Williams syndrome; attention; literacy and early reading development; longitudinal data analysis; neurodevelopmental disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Socio-behavioral strengths and weaknesses across syndromes. Note. Subscale raw scores and Total difficulties on SDQ for children with DS or WS.

References

    1. Antonarakis S. E., Lyle R., Dermitzakis E. T., Reymond A., Deutsch S. (2004). Chromosome 21 and Down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 725–738 10.1038/nrg1448 -DOI -PubMed
    1. Bailey D. B., Jr., Raspa M., Olmsted M., Holiday D. B. (2008). Co-occurring conditions associated with FMR1 gene variations: findings from a national parent survey. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 146A, 2060–2069 10.1002/ajmg.a.32439 -DOI -PubMed
    1. Bird E. K. R., Gaskell A., Babineau M. D., Macdonald S. (2000). Novel word acquisition in children with Down syndrome: does modality make a difference? J. Commun. Disord. 33, 241–266 10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00022-8 -DOI -PubMed
    1. Bull R., Espy K. A., Wiebe S. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Dev. Neuropsychol. 33, 205–228 10.1080/87565640801982312 -DOI -PMC -PubMed
    1. Byrne A., MacDonald J., Buckley S. (2002). Reading, language and memory skills: a comparative longitudinal study of children with Down syndrome and their mainstream peers. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 72, 513–529 10.1348/00070990260377497 -DOI -PubMed

LinkOut - more resources