Adjusting for early treatment termination in comparative clinical trials - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 1990 Dec;9(12):1417-24; discussion 1433-7.
doi: 10.1002/sim.4780091204.
Affiliations
- PMID: 2281229
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780091204
Comparative Study
Adjusting for early treatment termination in comparative clinical trials
S W Lagakos et al. Stat Med. 1990 Dec.
Abstract
In clinical trials of long-term therapies, patients often terminate their treatments earlier than planned. When analysing time-to-failure data, one approach to account for early treatment termination censors failure at the time of termination of therapy. In general, however, this does not produce valid inferences about the distribution of time to failure that would have occurred had treatment not been terminated. In contrast, intent-to-treat analyses, which are based on time to failure regardless of whether and when treatment is terminated, always produce valid inferences about the unconditional distribution of time to failure. Early treatment termination does not distort the size (type I error rate) of intent-to-treat tests but can cause a loss in power. Modifications to ordinary logrank tests can be used to recover some of the lost power without affecting test size, and can be most useful when the proportion of at-risk patients still taking their treatment changes substantially during periods when failures are observed. Extensions of the modified test to include strata are straightforward, although important design questions require further research.
Similar articles
- A simulation study comparing the power of nine tests of the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome.
Royston P, B Parmar MK. Royston P, et al. Trials. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4153-2. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32252820 Free PMC article. - The effects of non-compliance on intent-to-treat analysis of equivalence trials.
Sheng D, Kim MY. Sheng D, et al. Stat Med. 2006 Apr 15;25(7):1183-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.2230. Stat Med. 2006. PMID: 16220491 - Dynamic comparison of Kaplan-Meier proportions: monitoring a randomized clinical trial with a long-term binary endpoint.
Brittain E, Follmann D, Yang S. Brittain E, et al. Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):189-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00874.x. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Biometrics. 2008. PMID: 17680830 - Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M, Donner A, Klar N. Taljaard M, et al. Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):329-45. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710423. Biom J. 2008. PMID: 18537126 Review. - A systematic review finds variable use of the intention-to-treat principle in musculoskeletal randomized controlled trials with missing data.
Joseph R, Sim J, Ogollah R, Lewis M. Joseph R, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25304501 Review.
Cited by
- Estimation of treatment effects in weighted log-rank tests.
Lin RS, León LF. Lin RS, et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Sep 19;8:147-155. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.09.004. eCollection 2017 Dec. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017. PMID: 29696204 Free PMC article. - Gaining power and precision by using model-based weights in the analysis of late stage cancer trials with substantial treatment switching.
Bowden J, Seaman S, Huang X, White IR. Bowden J, et al. Stat Med. 2016 Apr 30;35(9):1423-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.6801. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Stat Med. 2016. PMID: 26576494 Free PMC article. - Improved logrank-type tests for survival data using adaptive weights.
Yang S, Prentice R. Yang S, et al. Biometrics. 2010 Mar;66(1):30-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01243.x. Epub 2009 Apr 13. Biometrics. 2010. PMID: 19397582 Free PMC article. - What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials.
Hollis S, Campbell F. Hollis S, et al. BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):670-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10480822 Free PMC article. Review. - The Diabetes Prevention Program. Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes.
The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Diabetes Care. 1999 Apr;22(4):623-34. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.4.623. Diabetes Care. 1999. PMID: 10189543 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.