Capture, anesthesia, and disturbance of free-ranging brown bears (Ursus arctos) during hibernation - PubMed (original) (raw)

Capture, anesthesia, and disturbance of free-ranging brown bears (Ursus arctos) during hibernation

Alina L Evans et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

We conducted thirteen immobilizations of previously collared hibernating two- to four-year-old brown bears (Ursus arctos) weighing 21-66 kg in central Sweden in winter 2010 and 2011 for comparative physiology research. Here we report, for the first time, an effective protocol for the capture and anesthesia of free-ranging brown bears during hibernation and an assessment of the disturbance the captures caused. Bears were darted in anthill, soil, or uprooted tree dens on eleven occasions, but two bears in rock dens fled and were darted outside the den. We used medetomidine at 0.02-0.06 mg/kg and zolazepam-tiletamine at 0.9-2.8 mg/kg for anesthesia. In addition, ketamine at 1.5 mg/kg was hand-injected intramuscularly in four bears and in six it was included in the dart at 1.1-3.0 mg/kg. Once anesthetized, bears were removed from the dens. In nine bears, arterial blood samples were analyzed immediately with a portable blood gas analyzer. We corrected hypoxemia in seven bears (PaO(2) 57-74 mmHg) with supplemental oxygen. We placed the bears back into the dens and antagonized the effect of medetomidine with atipamezole. Capturing bears in the den significantly increased the risk of den abandonment. One of twelve collared bears that were captured remained at the original den until spring, and eleven, left their dens (mean ± standard deviation) 3.2±3.6 (range 0.5-10.5) days after capture. They used 1.9±0.9 intermediate resting sites, during 6.2±7.8 days before entering a new permanent den. The eleven new permanent dens were located 730±589 m from the original dens. We documented that it was feasible and safe to capture hibernating brown bears, although they behaved differently than black bears. When doing so, researchers should use 25% of the doses used for helicopter darting during the active period and should consider increased energetic costs associated with den abandonment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hissa R, Siekkinen J, Hohtola E, Saarela S, Hakala A, et al. Seasonal patterns in the physiology of the European brown bear (Ursus arctos arctos) in Finland. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol. 1994;109:781–791. - PubMed
    1. Tsiouris JA, Chauhan VPS, Sheikh AM, Chauhan A, Malik M, et al. Similarities in acute phase protein response during hibernation in black bears and major depression in humans: a response to underlying metabolic depression? Can J Zoolog. 2004;82:1468–1476.
    1. Hissa R. Physiology of the European brown bear (Ursus arctos arctos). Ann Zool Fenn. 1997;34:267–287.
    1. Arinell K, Sahdo B, Evans AL, Arnemo JM, Baandrup U, et al. Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) Seem Resistant to Atherosclerosis Despite Highly Elevated Plasma Lipids during Hibernation and Active State. Clinical and Translational Science. 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752–8062.2011.00370.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frobert O, Christensen K, Fahlman Å, Brunberg S, Josefsson J, et al. Platelet function in brown bear (Ursus arctos) compared to man. Thromb J. 2010;8:11. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources