Implementation Science six years on--our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review - PubMed (original) (raw)

Implementation Science six years on--our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review

Martin P Eccles et al. Implement Sci. 2012.

Abstract

Implementation Science has been published for six years and over that time has gone from receiving 100 articles in 2006 to receiving 354 in 2011; our impact factor has risen from 2.49 in June 2010 to 3.10 in June 2012. Whilst our article publication rate has also risen, it has risen much less slowly than our submission rate--we published 29 papers in 2006 and 134 papers in 2011 and we now publish only around 40 % of submissions. About one-half of submitted manuscripts are rejected without being sent out for peer review; it has become clear that there are a number of common issues that result in manuscripts being rejected at this stage. We hope that by publishing this editorial on our common reasons for rejection without peer review we can help authors to better judge the relevance of their papers to Implementation Science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:979–983. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a979. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stetler CB, McQueen L, Demakis J, Mittman BS. An organizational framework and strategic implementation for system-level change to enhance research-based practice: QUERI Series. Implementation Science. 2008;3:30. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-30. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–312. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8(3):341–351. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800305. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, Smith JA. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004;13(3):223–225. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.008714. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources